Various enzymes were used to treat a protein-enriched rice flour for the production of rice protein isolates. The rice flour containing 49% protein was a by-product from the processing of brown rice for syrup production. The treatment sequence of α-amylase followed by glucoamylase was most effective, resulting in a product with 85% protein content. The product was then treated with a mixture of cellulase and xylanase, which raised the protein content in the insoluble fraction to 91%. Inorganic impurities, such as the metal manganese in the starting rice flour, were effectively removed. The recovered rice proteins, practically intact according to electrophoretic analysis, had relatively poor solubility and emulsification properties; however, these functional properties were improved substantially by adding xanthan gum as a functionality-enhancing agent.
Electrophoresis emulsification activity index (EA1) isolate, molecular weights protein subunits proteolysis rice proteins
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Cagampang, G.B., L.J. Cruz, S.G. Espiritu, R.G. Santiago, and B.O. Juliano, Studies on the Extraction and Composition of Rice Proteins, Cereal Chem., 43:145–155 (1966).Google Scholar
Morita, T. and S. Kiriyama, Mass Production Method for Rice Protein Isolate and Nutritional Evaluation, J. Food Sci. 56:1393–1396 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, F.F., E.T. Champagne, K. Daigle and Z. Zarins, Use of Enzymes in the Processing of Protein Products from Rice Bran and Rice Flour, Nahrung 43:14–18 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schagger, H. and G. von Jagow, Tricine-Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of Proteins in the Range from 1 to 100 kDa, Anal. Biochem., 166: 368–379 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, K.N. and J.E. Kinsella, Emulsifying Properties of Proteins: Evaluation of a Turbidimetric Technique, J. Agric. Food Chem., 26:716–723 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanasundara, P.K.J.P.D. and F. Shahidi, Removal of Flaxseed Mucilage by Chemical and Enzymatic Treatments, Food Chem. 59:47–55 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton and F. Smith, Calorimetric Method for Determination of Sugar and Related Substances, Anal. Chem., 28:350–356 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, R.F., L. Spahr, S. Fontaine and P. Layragues, Manganese Toxicity, Dopaminergic Dysfunction, and Hepatic Encephalopathy, Metab. Brain Dis., 10:259–267 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, J.M.E., A.P. Reynolds, N. Meadows, K. Khan, S.G. Long, G. Quaghebeur, W.J. Taylor and J.P. Milla, Manganese Toxicity in Children Receiving Long-Term Parenteral Nutrition, Lancet 347:1218–1221 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawai, N. and Y. Morita, Studies on Rice Glutelin. II. Cross-Structure of Glutelin from Rice Endosperm, Agr. Biol. Chem. (Tokyo) 32:496–500 (1968).Google Scholar
Xie, Y.R. and N. Hettiarachchy, Xanthan Gum Effects on Solubility and Emulsificatin Properties, J. Food Sci. 62:1101–1104 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar