Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis and Evaluation of a New Cationic Surfactant for Oil-Well Drilling Fluid

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

A new additive cationic surfactant for drilling fluid was synthesized by alkylation of coal tar phenol with tetradecyl alcohol; then, the alkyl phenol reacts with formaldehyde and amine to produce the Mannich base product. This product was reacted with sodium chloroacetate to produce the cationic surfactant; the structure of the synthesized surfactant was confirmed by FTIR analysis, evaluation of the prepared surfactant by surface properties such as surface tension, emulsification power, and wetting power. The prepared cationic surfactant showed good results when utilized in the formulation of both oil-based mud and synthetic-based mud as the primary emulsifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caenn R, Chillinger GV (1996) Drilling fluids: state of the art. J Petroleum Sci Eng 14:221–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitfill D, Rachal G, Lawson J (2002) Drilling salt. Effect drilling fluids on penetration rate and hole size. In: Proceedings SPE drilling conference Dallas, TX, USA. pp 631–638

  3. Anon (1998) Acidizing products and additives. J World Oil 219:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knox D, Jiany P (2005) Drilling further with water-based fluids selecting the right lubricant. In: Proceedings SPE inter symposium oil field chemistry, Houston, TX, USA. pp 9–15

  5. Darley HCH, Gary GG (1998) Composition and properties of drilling and completion fluids, 5th edn. Gulf Publishing Co, Houston, p 642

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chillingarian GV, Vorbuter P (1981) Drilling fluids. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aldea C, Brutan J, Dobbs WR, Klein AL (2005) Field verification invert- mud performance from water-based mud in Gulf of Mexico shelf. SPE Drill Complet 20:37–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Orto E (2003) On the physical and chemical stability of the shells. J Petroleum Sci Eng 38:213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadiq R, Husain T, Veitch B, Bose N (2003) Evaluation of generic types of drilling using a risk-based analytical hierarchy process, construction National Research Council (NRC), Ottawa, Canada. Environ Manage 32:778–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Austad T, Isom TP (2001) Compositional and PVT properties of reservoir fluids contaminated by drilling fluid. J Petroleum Sci Eng 30:213–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dardir MM (2001) M.Sc. Thesis on Preparation of some new emulsifying agents for oil–well drilling fluids, Faculty of Sciences, Ain Shams University, Egypt

  12. Dardir MM (2005) Ph.D. Thesis on synthesis and evaluation of some local surfactants and additives for oil–well drilling fluids, Faculty of Sciences, Ain Shams University, Egypt

  13. Zhangxin T, Norman RM (2006) Variation in wetting behaviour of mixed wet (ores resulting from probe oil solvency and exposure to synthetic oil-based mud emulsifiers). J Petroleum Sci Eng 52:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemphill T, Isambourg P (2005) The new model predicts oil, synthetic mud densities. J Oil Gas 103:56–58

    Google Scholar 

  15. Audibert A, Dalmazzone C, Dewattins C (2004) Special non polluting emulsifier for non-aqueous drilling fluids in deep off shore drilling. SPE Annual—Technical Conference, Houston TX. p 825–832

  16. Skalli L, Buckley J, Zhang Y, Morrow NR (2006) Surface and core wetting effects of surfactants in oil based drilling fluids. J Petroleum Sci Eng 52:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bryant EM, Bowman RS, Buekley JS (2006) Wetting alternation pf mica surfaces with polyethoxylated amine surfactants. J Petroleum Sci Engi 52:244–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald JA, Bullera DC (2003) The significance of formation damage caused by the adsorption oil-based mud surfactant, at BP Research Centre, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex TW16 7LN, UK

  19. Childs JD, Acosta E, Seamehan JF, Sabatini DA (2005) Surfactant-enhanced treatment of oil-based drill cutting. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME 127:153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahmoud SA (1999) PhD thesis in chemistry on synthesizes of surface active agents from Egyptian raw materials. Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

  21. Ferial M, Taiser G, Khidr T, Mahmoud SA (2007) Synergetic effect of pour point depressants and surfactant on the properties of crude oil fractions. Egypt Pharm J (NRC) 6:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van-o E, Lee J, Friedhein J, Toups B (2004) New flat rheology synthetic-based mud for improved deep water drilling. SPE Annual Technical Conference Houston, TX. pp 4579–4589

  23. Heir KH, Lonmbert B (2005) Synthetic polymer extends fluid loss control to HP/HT environments. J World Oil 226:75–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dieffenbayhur J, Dupre R, Authement G (2005) Drilling fluids planning and execution for world record water depth well. Paper SPE-65277 IADC-Drilling conference proceeding: back to basics. Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp 809–821

  25. Derricko N, Chimaka AW (2007) Effect of drilled solids on drilling performance. J Petroleum Sci Eng 55:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soad A. Mahmoud.

About this article

Cite this article

Mahmoud, S.A., Dardir, M.M. Synthesis and Evaluation of a New Cationic Surfactant for Oil-Well Drilling Fluid. J Surfact Deterg 14, 123–130 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-010-1214-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-010-1214-7

Keywords

Navigation