Advertisement

Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 205–214 | Cite as

Microemulsion formation and detergency with oily soils: II. Detergency formulation and performance

  • C. Tongcumpou
  • E. J. Acosta
  • L. B. Quencer
  • A. F. Joseph
  • J. F. Scamehorn
  • D. A. Sabatini
  • S. ChavadejEmail author
  • N. Yanumet
Article

Abstract

In part I of this series (J. Surfact. Deterg. 6, 191–203, 2003), the mixed surfactant system of sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (AOT), alkyl diphenyl oxide disulfonate (ADPODS) and sorbitan monooleate (Span 80) was shown to form Winsor type I and type III microemulsions with hexadecane and motor oil. In addition, high solubilization and low interfacial tension were obtained between the oils and surfactant solutions both in the supersolubilization region (Winsor type I system close to type III system) and at optimal conditions in a type III system. In the present study, this mixed surfactant system was applied to remove oily soil from fabric (a polyester/cotton blend), and detergency results were correlated to phase behavior. Dynamic interfacial tensions were also measured between the oils and washing solutions. In the supersolubilization and in the middle-phase regions (type III), much better detergency performance was found for both hexadecane and motor oil removal than that with a commercial liquid detergent product. In addition, the detergency performance of our system at low temperature (25°C) was close to that obtained at high temperature (55°C), consistent with the temperature robustness of the microemulsion phase behavior of this system.

Key Words

Detergency dynamic interfacial tension microemulsion mixed surfactants supersolubilization 

Abbreviations

ADPODS

alkyl diphenyl oxide disulfonate

AOT or Aerosol OT

sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate

C12E5

pentaethylene glycol mono-n-dodecyl ether

CP

commercial product

HLB

hydrophile-lipophile balance

IFT

interfacial tension

Span 80

sorbitan monooleate

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kissa, E., Evaluation of Detergency, in Detergency Theory and Technology, edited by W.G. Cutler and E. Kissa, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987, p. 2Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rybinski, W., Surface Chemistry in Detergency, in Handbook of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry, edited by K. Holmberg, D.O. Shah, and J.S. Milan, John Wiley & Sons, London, 2002, Vol. 1, p. 53.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dillan, K.W., E.D. Goddard, and D.A. McKenzie, Oily Soil Removal from a Polyester Substrate by Aqueous Nonionic Surfactant Systems, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:59 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broze, G., Detergents and Cleaners in A Handbook for Formulators, edited by K.R. Langer, Hanser, Munich, Germany, 1994, p. 29.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller, C.A., and K.H. Raney, Solubilization Emulsification-Mechanisms of Detergency, Colloids Surf A. 74:169 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourrel, M., and R.S., Schechter, Microemulsions and Related Systems, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998, p. 335.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mori, F., J.C. Lim, O.G. Raney, C.M. Elsik, and C.A. Miller, Phase Behavior, Dynamic Contacting and Detergency in System Containing Triolien and Nonionic Surfactants, Colloids Surf. A 40:323 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azemar, N., The Role of Microemulsions in Detergency Processes, in Industrial Applications of Microemulsions, edited by C. Solans and H. Kunieda, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996, p. 375.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solans, C., and N. Azemar, Detergency and HLB Temperature, in Organized Solutions, edited by S.E. Friberg and B. Lindman, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992, p. 273.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson, L., The Role of Oil Detachment Mechanism in Determining Optimum Detergency Conditions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 163:61 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linfield, W.M., E. Jungermann, and J.C. Sherrill, Establishment of a Standardized Detergency Evaluation Method, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 39:47 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Germain, T., Understanding Terg-O-Tometer Testing Variables, Paper presented at AOCS Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, May 5–8, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tongcumpou, C., E.J. Acosta, L.B. Quencer, A.F. Joseph, J.F. Scamehorn, D.A. Sabatini, S. Chavadej, and N. Yanumet, Microemulsion Formation and Detergency with Oily Soils: I Phase Behavior and Interfacial Tension, J. Surfact. Deterg. 6:191 (2003).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Standard Guide for Evaluating Stain Removal Performance in Home Laundering, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.04, American Society for Test and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, ASTM D 4265-98.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goel, S.K., Measuring Detergency of Oily Soils in the Vicinity of Phase Inversion Temperatures of Commercial Nonionic Surfactant Using an Oil-Soluble Dye, J. Surfact. Deterg. 1:221 (1998).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chi, Y.S., and S.K. Obendorf, Aging of Oily Soils on Textiles: Chemical Changes upon Oxidation and Interaction with Textile Fibers, J. Surfact. Deterg. 1:371 (1998).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chi, Y.S., and S.K. Obendorf, Aging of Oily Soils on Textiles Material: A Literature Review, J. Surfact. Deterg. 1:407 (1998).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Measuring Soil Removal from Artificially Soiled Fabrics, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.04, American Society for Test and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA. 2000, ASTM D 3050-98.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christ, T., W.W. Morgenthaler, and F. Pacholec, Laundry Products, in Detergents and Cleaners A Handbook for Formulators, edited by K.R. Lange, Hanser Publishers, Cincinnati, 1994, p. 133.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raney, K.H., Optimization of Nonionic/Anionic Surfactant Blends for Enhanced Oily Soil Removal, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:522 (1991).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chi, Y.S., and S.K. Obendorf, Detergency of Used Motor Oil from Cotton and Polyester Fabrics, J. Surfact. Deterg. 2:1 (1999).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goel, S.K., Phase Behavior and Detergency Study of Lauryl Alcohol Ethoxylates with High Ethylene Oxide Conten, J. Surfact. Deterg. 3:221 (2000).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Powe, W.C., Removal of Fatty Soils from Cotton in Aqueous Detergent Systems, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 40:290 (1963).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kissa, E., Kinetics of Oily Soil Release, Text. Res. J. 41:760 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jakobi, G., and A. Löhr, Detergents and Textile Washing, Henkel, Düsseldorf, Germany, 1987, p. 107.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu, B., Formulation of Petroleum Microemulsions Systems for Surfactant-Enhanced in-situ Subsurface Remediation, M.S. Thesis, University of Oklahoma, 1996, p. 15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kunieda, H., Formation of Liquid Crystals in Dilute Mixed Surfactants Systems, in Mixed Surfactant Systems, edited by K. Ogino and M. Abe, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992, p. 235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS Press 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Tongcumpou
    • 1
  • E. J. Acosta
    • 2
  • L. B. Quencer
    • 3
  • A. F. Joseph
    • 3
  • J. F. Scamehorn
    • 2
  • D. A. Sabatini
    • 2
  • S. Chavadej
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Yanumet
    • 1
  1. 1.The Petroleum and Petrochemical CollegeChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Institute for Applied Surfactant ResearchUniversity of OklahomaNorman
  3. 3.The Dow Chemical CompanySouth Charleston

Personalised recommendations