Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring complexity in manufacturing systems: a new metric in flow shop (Fs) and job shop (Js) environments

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The business environment is becoming increasingly fast-paced, competitive and demanding, making it vital for manufacturing processes to create agile, flexible and simplified environments. The objective of this research is to apply a new entropic and hybrid metric to measure complexity in manufacturing systems with flow shop and job shop environments. The methodological approach is based on equations that facilitate entropic analysis in different types of scenarios and provide quantitative support for decision making. The model is defined in two vectors, one of a classical subjective type based on the complexity index method (CXI), and the other of an objective type focused on Shannon's entropy metric. In both situations a new entropic metric of complexity measurement is applied. For its application, the following are used two particular case studies are used for its application and finally the results and discussions are presented. The findings allow us to solve, with the new method, the shortcomings found in the classical methods and to propose improvement bets in the areas detected in the different processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Quirk M (1999) Manufacturing, teams, and ımprovement: the human art of manufacturing. Prentice-Hall, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanner JP (2020) Manufacturing engineering: an introduction to the basic functions, revised and expanded. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson B (1984) Systems: concepts, methodologies, and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chryssolouris G (2006) Overview of manufacturing processes. Manuf Syst Theory Pract: 55–124

  5. Vidal GH, Hernández JRC (2021) Study of the effects of complexity on the manufacturing sector. Prod Eng Res Devel 15:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-01014-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozarth CC, Warsing DP, Flynn BB, Flynn EJ (2009) The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. J Oper Manag 27(1):78–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manuj I, Sahin F (2011) A model of supply chain and supply chain decision making complexity. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 41(5):511–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111138844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland JH (2018) Can there be a unified theory of complex adaptive systems? In: The mind, the brain and complex adaptive systems (pp. 45–50). Routledge

  9. Gell-Mann M (2018) Complex adaptive systems. In: The mind, the brain and complex adaptive systems (pp. 11–24). Routledge.

  10. Herrera Vidal G, Coronado Hernández JR (2021) Complexity in manufacturing systems: a literature review. Prod Eng Res Devel 15:321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-01013-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frizelle G, Woodcock E (1995) Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(5):26–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perona M, Miragliotta G (2004) Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework. Int J Product Econ 90(1):103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00482-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu Y, Frizelle G, Ayral L, Marsein J, Van de Merwe E, Zhou D (2002) A simulation study on supply chain complexity in manufacturing industry. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the Manufacturing Complexity Network. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

  14. Jacobs MA (2007) Product complexity: a definition and impacts on operations. Decision Line. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1004358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Efthymiou K, Mourtzis D, Pagoropoulos A, Papakostas N, Chryssolouris G (2016) Manufacturing systems complexity analysis methods review. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(9):1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2015.1130245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vidal GH, Hernández JRC, Minnaard C, Gatica G, Schwarzenberg P (2022) Statistical analysis of manufacturing system complexity. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 120(5):3427–3436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08981-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelso JA (2009/2013) In: Ra Meyers (Ed.) Encyclopedia of complexity and system science. Springer, Heidelberg (pp. 1537–1564)..https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5

  18. Isik F (2010) An entropy-based approach for measuring complexity in supply chains. Int J Prod Res 48(12):3681–3696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brinzer B, Banerjee A (2018) Measuring the human aspect: the key for managing the complexity in production. In: Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, July 17–21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA 8 (pp. 14–24). Springer International Publishing.

  20. Vidal GH, Coronado-Hernández JR, Minnaard C (2022) Measuring manufacturing system complexity: a literature review. J Intell Manufact. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01974-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garbie IH, Shikdar A (2011) Analysis and estimation of complexity level in industrial firms. Int J Ind Syst Eng 8(2):175–197. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijise.2011.041368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aelker J, Bauernhansl T, Ehm H (2013) Managing complexity in supply chains: A discussion of current approaches on the example of the semiconductor industry. Procedia CIRP 7:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frizelle G, Woodcock G (1995) Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(5):26–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Christopher M, Holweg M (2011) Supply Chain 2.0: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. Int J Phys Distrib Log Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hon KKB (2005) Performance and evaluation of manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann 54(2):139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60023-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiendahl HP, Scheffczyk H (1999) Simulation based analysis of complex production systems with methods of nonlinear dynamics. CIRP Ann 48(1):357–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63201-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kluth A, Schiffer M, Fries C, König J (2020) Influencing factors of the digital transformation on the supply chain complexity dimensions. J Product Syst Log. https://doi.org/10.15488/9916

  28. Jäger J, Schöllhammer O, Lickefett M, Bauernhansl T (2016) Advanced complexity management strategic recommendations of handling the “Industrie 4.0” complexity for small and medium enterprises. Procedia Cirp 57:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tamaskar S, Neema K, DeLaurentis D (2014) Framework for measuring complexity of aerospace systems. Res Eng Design 25:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0169-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinha K, de Weck OL (2016) Empirical validation of structural complexity metric and complexity management for engineering systems. Syst Eng 19(3):193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yates FE (1978) Complexity and the limits to knowledge. Am J Physiol Regul Integrat Comparat Physiol 235(5):R201–R204. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1978.235.5.r201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. De Rosnay J (1977).Il macroscopio: verso una visione globale (Vol. 60). Edızıonı Dedalo

  33. Simon HA (1991) The architecture of complexity. In: Facets of systems science (pp. 457–476). Springer, Boston

  34. Vidal GH, Hernández JRC, Minnaard C (2022) Modeling and statistical analysis of complexity in manufacturing systems under flow shop and hybrid environments. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 118(9):3049–3058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08028-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Efthymiou K, Pagoropoulos A, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2014) Manufacturing systems complexity: an assessment of manufacturing performance indicators unpredictability. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7(4):324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peters K, Worbs J, Parlitz U, Wiendahl HP (2004) Manufacturing systems with restricted buffer sizes. Nonlinear Dyn Prod Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527602585.ch3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chryssolouris G, Giannelos N, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D (2004) Chaos theory in production scheduling. CIRP Ann 53(1):381–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60721-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Giannelos N, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2007) Dispatching policy for manufacturing jobs and time-delay plots. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 20(4):329–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920600786604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Donner R, Scholz-Reiter B, Hinrichs U (2008) Nonlinear characterization of the performance of production and logistics networks. J Manuf Syst 27(2):84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2008.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang KJ, Wee HM, Gao SF, Chung SL (2005) Production and inventory control with chaotic demands. Omega 33(2):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Scholz-Reiter B, Freitag M, Schmieder A (2002) Modelling and control of production systems based on nonlinear dynamics theory. CIRP Ann 51(1):375–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61540-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Papakostas N, Mourtzis D (2007) An approach for adaptability modeling in manufacturing–analysis using chaotic dynamics. CIRP Ann 56(1):491–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Efthymiou K, Pagoropoulos A, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2012) Manufacturing systems complexity review: challenges and outlook. Procedia CIRP 3:644–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Deshmukh AV, Talavage JJ, Barash MM (1998) Complexity in manufacturing systems, part 1: analysis of static complexity. IIE Trans 30(7):645–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179808966508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Efstathiou J, Calinescu A, Blackburn G (2002) A web-based expert system to assess the complexity of manufacturing organizations. Robot Comput Integ Manuf 18(3–4):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-5845(02)00022-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Zeltzer L, Limère V, Van Landeghem H, Aghezzaf EH, Stahre J (2013) Measuring complexity in mixed-model assembly workstations. Int J Prod Res 51(15):4630–4643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.783246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson EJ (1981) A new continuous model for job-shop scheduling. Int J Syst Sci 12(12):1469–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207728108963831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Avram F, Bertsimas D, Ricard M (1995) Fluid models of sequencing problems in open queueing networks; an optimal control approach. IMA 71:199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2418-9_11

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Dai JG (1995) On positive Harris recurrence of multiclass queueing networks: a unified approach via fluid limit models. Ann Appl Prob. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoap/1177004828

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Weiss G (1999) Scheduling and control of manufacturing systems-a fluid approach. In: Proceedings Of The Annual Allerton Conference On Communication Control And Computing (Vol. 37, pp. 577–586). The University; 1998

  52. Kim YS (1999) A system complexity approach for the integration of product development and production system design (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9418

  53. ElMaraghy WH, Urbanic RJ (2003) Modelling of manufacturing systems complexity. CIRP Ann 52(1):363–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60602-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mattsson S, Gullander P, Davidsson A (2011) Method for measuring production complexity. In: 28th International Manufacturing Conference

  55. Byrne D, Callaghan G (2013) Complexity theory and the social sciences: the state of the art. Routledge

  56. Vidal GH, Coronado-Hernández JR, Niebles ACP (2022) Conceptual model for measuring complexity in manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Sustainable Computing (pp. 181–189). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4538-9_19

  57. Vidal GH, Coronado-Hernández JR, González GG (2022) Evaluation and analysis of models for the measurement of complexity in manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Sustainable Computing (pp. 469–477). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4538-9_46

  58. Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Manage Sci 46(6):824–844. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.6.824.11940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pich MT, Loch CH, Meyer AD (2002) On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Manage Sci 48(8):1008–1023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mihm J, Loch C, Huchzermeier A (2003) Problem–solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Manage Sci 49(6):733–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Vidal GH, Hernández JRC, Minnaard C (2023) A new perspective on measuring entropic complexity in manufacturing systems. Int J Interact Design Manuf (IJIDeM). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01462-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Calinescu A (2000) Complexity in manufacturing: an information theoretic approach. In: Conference on complexity and complex systems in industry, 19–20 Sept 2000 (pp. 19–20). University of Warwick

  63. Fässberg T, Harlin U, Garmer K, Gullander P, Fasth Å, Mattsson S, Stahre J (2011) An empirical study towards a definition of production complexity. In: International Conference on Production Research

  64. Mattsson S, Fasth Å, Stahre J, Karlsson M, Dencker K, Gullander P, Davidsson A (2013) Validation of the complexity index method at three manufacturing companies. In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) (pp. 55–57). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/isam.2013.6643487

  65. Calinescu A, Efstathiou J, Bermejo J, Schirn J (1997) Assessing decision-making and process complexity in a manufacturer through simulation. IFAC Proc Vol 30(24):149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Guimaraes T, Martensson N, Stahre J, Igbaria M (1999) Empirically testing the impact of manufacturing system complexity on performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910294228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Eckstein D, Goellner M, Blome C, Henke M (2015) The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: the moderating effect of product complexity. Int J Prod Res 53(10):3028–3046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Dyer, C. (1995). Beginning research in psychology: A practical guide to research methods and statistics. Blackwell Publishing.

  69. MacDuffie JP, Sethuraman K, Fisher ML (1996) Product variety and manufacturing performance: evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study. Manage Sci 42(3):350–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hu SJ, Zhu X, Wang H, Koren Y (2008) Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains. CIRP Ann 57(1):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bouhadja K, Boubekeur A, Bouaziz M (2020) Complex parts partitioning by elementary geometric objects clustering in CAD/CAM process. J Institut Eng (India): Seri C 101(2):229–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-019-00528-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dixit US, Bag S (2017) Special theme: modelling of manufacturing processes. J Institut Eng (India) Ser C 98(1):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0342-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Singh SK, Singh MK (2012) Evaluation of productivity, quality and flexibility of an advanced manufacturing system. J Institut Eng (India): Ser C 93(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-011-0002-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Jeyaraj KL, Muralidharan C, Mahalingam R, Deshmukh SG (2013) Applying value stream mapping technique for production improvement in a manufacturing company: a case study. J Institut Eng (India): Ser C 94(1):43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-012-0053-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bhongade AS, Khodke PM (2014) A genetic algorithm for flow shop scheduling with assembly operations to minimize makespan. J Instit Eng India: Ser C 95(2):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-014-0111-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the 2 small and medium-sized enterprises in the manufacturing sector in the city of Cartagena, Colombia, for their access to technical visits, information gathering and support. We would also like to thank the Universidad del Sinú (USINU)-Colombia, for the support of its academic and scientific group, especially the DeArtica research group. We would also like to thank the Universidad de la Costa (CUC)-Colombia and the Universidad Nacional Lomas de Zamora (UNLZ)-Argentina.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the development of the research and approval of the final version. GHV, conceptualisation, methodology, research, writing—original draft, revision and editing. JRCH, conceptualisation, methodology. CM: research and analysis of input and output data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germán Herrera Vidal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This work complies with ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidal, G.H., Hernández, J.R.C. & Minnaard, C. Measuring complexity in manufacturing systems: a new metric in flow shop (Fs) and job shop (Js) environments. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 18, 653–665 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01237-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01237-z

Keywords

Navigation