Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Priority-based multi-objective algorithms for green supply chain network design with disruption consideration

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research answers three current supply chain issues: demand variability, disruptions, and sustainability. We develop a multi-objective supply chain network model integrating inventory decisions for each echelon under demand uncertainty and limited production capacity. The model describes the optimal productions and allocations in normal and disrupted conditions. The objective function is to minimize the total supply chain cost and emissions. To handle the complexity, we proposed a priority-based Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (pb-NSGA-II) and priority-based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (pb-MOPSO) with four novel decoding procedures to accommodate the priority: ordering cost, carbon emission, backtrack priority-based decoding, and adaptive decoding. The experiments indicate that at low disruption duration, the supply chain network design (SCND) is not affected by the disruption due to the existence of safety stock. However, the SCND starts rescheduling and reallocating its demands at medium and high disruption durations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Watson M, Lewis S, Cacioppi P, Jayaraman J (2013) Supply chain network design: Applying optimization and analytics to the global supply chain. Pearson Education, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melnyk SA, Narasimhan R, Decampos H (2014) Supply chain design: issues, challenges, frameworks and solutions. Int J Prod Res 52(7):1887–1896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.787175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Statista (2020) Which conditions make businesses most vulnerable to value chain disruptions, including COVID-19? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1155422/conditions-supply-chain-vulnerability-gvc/?locale=en. Assessed 18 Jan 2023

  4. Puga MS, Tancrez J (2017) A heuristic algorithm for solving large location–inventory problems with demand uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 259(2):413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.037

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiassat A, Diabat A, Rahwan I (2017) A genetic algorithm approach for location-inventory-routing problem with perishable products. J Manuf Syst 42:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng X, Yin M, Zhang Y (2019) Integrated optimization of location, inventory and routing in supply chain network design. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 121:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Statista (2022a) Supply chain challenges in 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1182057/global-supply-chain-challenges/?locale=en. Assessed 18 Jan 2023

  8. Statista (2022b) Number of supply chain disruptions worldwide from 2019 to 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1267082/supply-chain-disruptions-worldwide/?locale=en. Assessed 18 Jan 2023

  9. Hosseini-Motlagh S, Nami N, Farshadhfar Z (2020) Collection disruption management and channel coordination in a socially concerned closed-loop supply chain: A game theory approach. J Clean Prod 276:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gautam P, Khanna A, Jaggi CK (2021) An integrated green supply chain model with product recovery management towards a cleaner system. J Clean Prod 320:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivanov D (2019) Disruption tails and revival policies: a simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods. Comput Ind Eng 127:558–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sawik T (2019) Two-period vs. multi-period model for supply chain disruption management. Int J Prod Res 57:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1504246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bottani E, Murino T, Schiavo M, Akkerman R (2019) Resilient food supply chain design: modelling framework and metaheuristic solution approach. Comput Ind Eng 135:177–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Masruroh NA, Putra RKE, Mulyani YP, Rifai AP (2022) Strategic insights into recovery from supply chain disruption: a multi-period production planning model. J Oper Res Soc 56:227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2115414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen J, Wang H, Zhong RY (2021) A supply chain disruption recovery strategy considering product change under COVID-19. J Manuf Syst 60:920–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gholami-Zanjani SM, Jabalameli MS, Pishvaee MS (2021) A resilient-green model for multi-echelon meat supply chain planning. Comput Ind Eng 152:107018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dulebenets MA (2021) An Adaptive polyploid memetic algorithm for scheduling trucks at a cross-docking terminal. Inf Sci 565:390–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.02.039

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kordasiabi MC, Gholizadeh H, Khakifirooz M, Fathi M (2022) Robust-heuristic-based optimisation for an engine oil sustainable supply chain network under uncertainty. Int J Prod Res 61(4):1313–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2035010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karimi SK, Naini SGJ, Sadjadi SJ (2021) An integration of environmental awareness into flexible supply chains: a trade-off between costs and environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13454-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gholizadeh H, Goh M, Fazlollahtabar H, Mamashli Z (2022) Modelling uncertainty in sustainable-green integrated reverse logistics network using metaheuristics optimization. Comput Ind Eng 163:107828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasha J, Nwodu AL, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Tian G, Li Z, Wang H, Dulebenets MA (2022) Exact and metaheuristic algorithms for the vehicle routing problem with a factory-in-a-box in multi-objective settings. Adv Eng Inform 52:101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoei MA, Aria SS, Gholizadeh H, Goh M, Cheikhrouhou N (2022) Big data-driven optimization for sustainable reverse logistics network design. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04357-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pahlevan SM, Hosseini SMS, Goli A (2021) Sustainable supply chain network design using products’ life cycle in the aluminum industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12150-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yavari M, Zaker H (2019) An integrated two-layer network model for designing a resilient green-closed loop supply chain of perishable products under disruption. J Clean Prod 230:198–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehrjerdi YZ, Shafiee M (2020) A resilient and sustainable closed-loop supply chain using multiple sourcing and information sharing strategies. J Clean Prod 289:125141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamedirostami A, Goli A, Gholipour-Kanani Y (2022) Green cross-dock based supply chain network design under demand uncertainty using new metaheuristic algorithms. J Ind Manag Optim 18(5):3103–3131. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2021105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Jahani H, Gholizadeh H (2022) A flexible closed loop supply chain design considering multi-stage manufacturing and queuing based inventory optimization. IFAC-Papers Online 55(10):1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Darom NA, Hishamuddin H, Ramli R, Nopiah ZM (2018) An inventory model of supply chain disruption recovery with safety stock and carbon emission consideration. J Clean Prod 197:1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dulebenets MA, Moses R, Ozguven EE, Vanli A (2017) Minimizing carbon dioxide emissions due to container handling at marine container terminals via hybrid evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Access 5:8131–8147. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2693030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bo H, Chen Y, Li H, Han P, Qi L (2021) Time-sensitive supply chain disruption recovery and resource sharing incentive strategy. J Manag Sci Eng 6(2):165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Paul SK, Sarker R, Essam D (2017) A quantitative model for disruption Mitigation in a supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 257(3):881–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.035

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Malik AI, Sarkar B (2020) Disruption management in a constrained multi-product imperfect production system. J Manuf Syst 56:227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hishamuddin H, Sarker RA, Essam D (2013) A recovery model for a two-echelon serial supply chain with consideration of transportation disruption. Comput Ind Eng 64(2):552–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qi X, Bard JF, Yu G (2004) Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions. Omega 32(4):301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2003.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B, Ivanova M (2017) Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. Int J Prod Res 55(20):6158–6174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1330572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rezapour S, Farahani RZ, Pourakbar M (2017) Resilient supply chain network design under competition: A case study. Eur J Oper Res 259(3):1017–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.041

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Hishamuddin H, Mohamad Sobri FM, Nur Ghafar FA, and Noraida Darom AM (2019) A recovery model for an EPQ system subject to supply disruption with consideration of safety stock. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, pp 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEA.2019.8715204

  38. Ganeshan R, Harrison TP (2002) An introduction to supply chain management. Penn State University, Departement of Management Science and Information Systems

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kamalahmadi M, Parast MM (2017) An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies. Int J Prod Econ 184:210–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yan S, Ji X (2020) Supply chain network design under the risk of uncertain disruptions. Int J Prod Res 58(6):1724–1740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1696999

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu H, Guo S, Qin Y, Lin W (2023) Two-stage stochastic programming model and algorithm for mitigating supply disruption risk on aircraft manufacturing supply chain network design. Comput Ind Eng 175:108880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Winati FD (2020) Pengembangan model optimasi jaringan rantai pasok dengan mempertimbangkan inventory control. Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada

  43. Gen M, Altiparmak F, Lin L (2006) A genetic algorithm for two-stage transportation problem using priority-based encoding. OR Spectr 28:337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-005-0029-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A Fast and Elitist Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Katoch S, Chauhan S, Kumar V (2020) A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimed Tools Appl 80(5):8091–8126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuo RJ, Gosumolo M, Zulvia FE (2019) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm using adaptive archive grid for numerical association rule mining. Neural Comput Appl 31:3559–3572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3278-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Govindan K, Jafarian A, Khodaverdi R, Devika K (2014) Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food. Int J Prod Econ 152:9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study is funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, grant number 018/E5/PG.02.00.PT/2022 and 1718/UN1/DITLIT/Dit-Lit/PT.01.03/2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Nur Aini Masruroh, Achmad Pratama Rifai, Yun Prihantina Mulyani, Vhysnu Satya Ananta & Muhammad Fernanda Luthfiansyah

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto, Purwokerto, Indonesia

    Famila Dwi Winati

Authors
  1. Nur Aini Masruroh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Achmad Pratama Rifai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yun Prihantina Mulyani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vhysnu Satya Ananta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Fernanda Luthfiansyah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Famila Dwi Winati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nur Aini Masruroh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masruroh, N.A., Rifai, A.P., Mulyani, Y.P. et al. Priority-based multi-objective algorithms for green supply chain network design with disruption consideration. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 18, 117–140 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01220-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01220-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation