Advertisement

Production Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 743–749 | Cite as

In-situ material classification in sheet-metal blanking using deep convolutional neural networks

  • M. UnterbergEmail author
  • P. Niemietz
  • D. Trauth
  • K. Wehrle
  • T. Bergs
Quality Assurance
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

Sheet-metal blanking is a class of metal fabricating processes that separate a metal workpiece from a primary metal sheet through a shearing process. Industry experts observe fluctuations in tool life and product quality, which is associated with fluctuations in microstructural parameters between and along material coils. With a methodology, that provides reliable information about the current material state in situ through a non-destructive testing method, process parameters, such as forces, speed, and lubrication could be adapted accordingly. This would enhance the productivity of sheet-metal blanking processes or other sheet-metal forming processes with a high process adaptability. The findings of this paper suggest that fluctuations of microstructural parameters along a material coil follow a pattern that is detectable for ferromagnetic materials using magnetic barkhausen noise emission. The preprocessed signal of 18 specimens stemming from six different coils have been encoded to recurrence plots and classified with a deep convolutional neural network with regard to the position on the coil that the respective specimen stem from. The neural network was able to reliably distinct between the recurrence plot of a specimen stemming from the beginning, the middle, or the end of a material coil. Through an advanced labelling approach and classifying for specific microstructural parameters, the same methodology could possibly be used to detect certain material states and quality deficits and to adjust the sheet-metal blanking process accordingly to enhance tool life and product quality.

Keywords

Sheet-metal blanking Magnetic barkhausen noise Convolutional neural networks Industrial internet of things 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation DFG for the kind support within the Cluster of Excellence “Internet of Production” (Project ID: 390621612). Furthermore the authors would like to thank the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy for the kind support within the research project “Mittelstand 4.0 – Digitale Produktions- und Arbeitsprozesse”.

References

  1. 1.
    Klocke F (2014) Manufacturing processes 4: forming. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harsch D, Fischer P, Berisha B, Heingärtner J, Renkci Y, Hora P (2018) Considering fluctuations of material properties, stainless steel 1.4301, on manufacturability of kitchen sinks. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing ,vol. 418, no. 1, p. 012113Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siegert K (ed) (2015) Blechumformung: Verfahren. Springer, Werkzeuge und MaschinenGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zheng Q, Zhuang X, Zhao Z (2019) State-of-the-art and future challenge in fine-blanking technology. Prod Eng Res Devel 13(1):61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monostori L, Kádár B, Bauernhansl T, Kondoh S, Kumara S, Reinhart G, Ueda K (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann 65(2):621–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hull JB (2015). Non-destructive testing. Macmillan International Higher EducationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gür CH, Cam I (2007) Comparison of magnetic Barkhausen noise and ultrasonic velocity measurements for microstructure evaluation of SAE 1040 and SAE 4140 steels. Mater Charact 58(5):447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zapperi S, Cizeau P, Durin G, Stanley HE (1998) Dynamics of a ferromagnetic domain wall: avalanches, depinning transition, and the Barkhausen effect. Phys Rev B 58(10):6353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sorsa A, Leiviskä K, Santa-aho S, Lepistö T (2012) Quantitative prediction of residual stress and hardness in case-hardened steel based on the Barkhausen noise measurement. NDT and E Int 46:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang Z, Oates T (2015) Encoding time series as images for visual inspection and classification using tiled convolutional neural networks. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marwan N, Romano MC, Thiel M, Kurths J (2007) Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys Rep 438(5–6):237–329MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eckmann JP, Kamphorst SO, Ruelle D (1995) Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. World Sci Ser Nonlinear Sci Ser A 16:441–446Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thiel M, Romano MC, Kurths J (2004) How much information is contained in a recurrence plot? Phys Lett A 330(5):343–349MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schinkel S, Dimigen O, Marwan N (2008) Selection of recurrence threshold for signal detection. Eur Phys J Spe Top 164(1):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Napoletano P, Piccoli F, Schettini R (2018) Anomaly detection in nanofibrous materials by CNN-based self-similarity. Sensors 18(1):209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770–778Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loshchilov I, Hutter F (2017) Fixing weight decay regularization in adam. arXiv preprint: 1711.05101Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith LN (2017) Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, pp. 464–472Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glebke R, Henze M, Wehrle K, Niemietz P, Trauth D, Mattfeld MBA, Bergs T (2019) A case for integrated data processing in large-scale cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding S, Tian G, Sutthaweekul R (2019) Non-destructive hardness prediction for 18CrNiMo7-6 steel based on feature selection and fusion of Magnetic Barkhausen Noise. NDT and E Int 107:102138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Unterberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Niemietz
    • 1
  • D. Trauth
    • 1
  • K. Wehrle
    • 2
  • T. Bergs
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production EngineeringWZL of RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Communication and Distributed Systems, COMSYS of RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations