Decision support system for outsourcing strategies

Abstract

A decision support system (DSS) was conceptually developed to support the decision maker (DM) in classify the activities into core and non-core competencies, and to establish their outsourcing relationship. This DSS is recommended because companies have seen the outsourcing as an alternative for business survival in a competitive market. Thus, for each manufacturing process, the DM needs to be able to decide make or buy (MvB). For this, one approach used is the core competences analysis. However, this evaluation is not trivial because it usually involves several factors. Moreover, pre-fixed scales are common, and it increases the cognitive effort of DM. Therefore, the proposed DSS was able to simplify the outsourcing problem, reducing the cognitive effort required, and giving to the DM a better recommendation according to his/her preferences. A manager can use this DSS to improve his/her understand about the company’ core competencies and, then, to make a final decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Kahraman C, Engin O, Kabak Ö, Kaya I (2009) Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach. Eng Appl Artif Intel 22(6):832–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Liou JJH, Wang HS, Hsu CC, Yin SL (2011) A hybrid model for selection of an outsourcing provider. Appl Math Model 35(10):5121–5133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gunasekaran A, Irani Z, Choy K-L, Filippi L (2015) Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: a review for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ 161:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Treber S, Moser E, Helming S, Haefner B, Lanza G (2019) Practice-oriented methodology for reallocating production technologies to production locations in global production networks. Prod Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00876-5

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Werkgroep In-outsourcing—NEVI (2001) Het procesmatig uitvoeren van in-outsourcing. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Inkoopverantwoordelijken, Amsterdam. http://docplayer.nl/1483523-Het-procesmatig-uitvoeren-van-in-outsourcing.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2017

  6. 6.

    Hafeez K, Zhang YB, Malak N (2002) Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 76(1):39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00141-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Qureshi MA, Salman M, Khalid R (2013) Development of a framework for strategic outsourcing in developing countries. Int J Mater Mech Manuf 1(1):92–96. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.20

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pratap S (2014) Towards a framework for performing outsourcing capability. Strateg Outsourcing 7(3):226–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-04-2014-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Reilly P (2014) Outsourcing decision making: can we make it more considered? Institute for Employment Studies—IES Perspectives on HR. http://www.employment-studies.co.uk. Accessed 21 Oct 2018

  10. 10.

    Espino-Rodríguez TF, Ramírez-Fierro JC (2017) Factors determining hotel activity outsourcing. An approach based on competitive advantage. Int J Contemp Hosp M 29(8):2006–2026. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2016-0291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Espino-Rodríguez TF, Chun-Lai P, Gil-Padilla AM (2017) Does outsourcing moderate the effects of asset specificity on performance? An application in Taiwanese hotels. J Hosp Tour Manag 31:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Huth C, Kieckhäfer K, Spengler TS (2015) Make-or-buy strategies for electric vehicle batteries—a simulation-based analysis. Technol Forecast Soc 99:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schmidt AST, Touray E, Hansen ZNL (2017) A framework for international location decisions for manufacturing firms. Prod Eng Res Dev 11:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0770-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cervi AFC, Carpinetti LCR (2017) Essential competencies of the organization: evaluation of outsourcing based on the ELECTRE TRI (Transl.). PODes 9(2):95–108. https://doi.org/10.4322/PODes.2017.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bär K, Herbert-Hansen ZNL, Khalid W (2018) Considering Industry 4.0 aspects in the supply chain for an SME. Prod Eng 12:747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0851-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dombrowski U, Crespo I, Zahn T (2010) Adaptive configuration of a lean production system in small and medium-sized enterprises. Prod Eng Res Dev 4(4):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-010-0250-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Figueira JR, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139(2):317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fontana ME, Morais DC, de Almeida AT (2011) A MCDM model for urban water conservation strategies adapting Simos procedure for evaluating alternatives intra-criteria. In: Takahashi RHC et al (eds) Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization—EMO 2011. Heidelberg—lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_39

  19. 19.

    Mousseau V, Slowinski R (1998) Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. J Glob Optim 12:157–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008210427517

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Baradari M (2016) Develop the strategic outsourcing with consideration of core competency criteria independence. JOAMS 4(1):57–60. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.1.57-60

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen Y-H, Wang T-C, Wu C-Y (2011) Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):13216–13222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hahn GJ, Sens T, Decouttere C, Vandaele NJ (2016) A multi-criteria approach to robust outsourcing decision-making in stochastic manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 98:275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hsu C-C, Liou JJH (2013) An outsourcing provider decision model for the airline industry. J Air Transp Manag 28:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kumar R, Singh H, Dureja JS (2012) An approach to analyze logistic outsourcing problem in medium-scale organization by CFPR and VIKOR. J Manuf Technol Manag 23(7):885–898. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381211267718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liou JJH, Chuang Y-T (2010) Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Syst Appl 37(5):3755–3761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcele Elisa Fontana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fontana, M.E., Aragão, J.P.S. & Morais, D.C. Decision support system for outsourcing strategies. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 13, 547–555 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00907-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Third party
  • Decision support system
  • Revised Simos’ procedure
  • Multiple criteria decision-making