Skip to main content
Log in

Criticality analysis of spare parts management: a multi-criteria classification regarding a cross-plant central warehouse strategy

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today an efficient warehouse and inventory management of spare parts for production machinery is essential for service organizations. Optimal strategies in procurement, stocking and supply play an important role for serviceability in spare parts management. In this context, individual item criticality should be considered, which describes how crucial a spare part is. This paper presents a three-dimensional classification approach for spare parts regarding a cross-plant central warehouse strategy of a service network. The approach uses two dimensions to estimate value and predictability of spare parts with aid of an ABC and XYZ analysis. The third dimension VED analyses a multi-criteria criticality classification and six feasible criteria are identified to describe item criticality. The methodology of the analysis is based on a decision tree, which represents the defined criteria by nodes. In addition, the analytic hierarchy process is used to solve the multi-criteria decision problems at the different nodes of the decision tree. The approach is developed in a research project and evaluation of spare parts is performed based on real inventory and transaction data in cooperation with an industrial company. As a result 15,000 out of 50,000 items could be classified as suitable for central warehousing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behmann B (2012) Servicefähigkeit: Eine Methode zur Serviceplanung und simulativen Bestimmung der Servicefähigkeit auf Basis des Ausfallverhaltens von Maschinenkomponenten. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lanza G, Behmann B (2011) Advanced steps to optimize the serviceability. Advances in production management systems (APMS), 26.09.2011–28.09.2011, Stavanger. Norwegen. Heidelberg, Springer, New York

  3. Biedermann H (2008) Ersatzteilmanagement: Effiziente Ersatzteillogistik für Industrieunternehmen, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Niggeschmidt S (2010) Ausfallgerechte Ersatzteilbereitstellung im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau mittels lastabhängiger Lebensdauerprognose. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oeldorf G, Olfert K (2013) Material-Logistik. Olfert K (ed) Kompendium der praktischen Betriebswirtschaft. 13th edition. NWB Verlag, Heme

  6. Pawellek G (2013) Integrierte Instandhaltung und Ersatzteillogistik: Vorgehensweisen, Methoden, Tools. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Braglia M, Grassi A, Montanari R (2004) Multi-attribute classification method for spare parts inventory management. J Qual Maint Eng 10(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Syntetos AA, Keyes M, Babai MZ, (2008) Demand categorisation in a European spare parts logistics network. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29(3):292–316. Methoden, Tools. Springer, Heidelberg

  9. Molenaers A, Baets H, Pintelon L, Waeyenbergh G (2011) Criticality classification of spare parts: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 140:570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matyas K (2013) Instandhaltungslogistik: Qualität und Produktivität steigern, 5th edn. Hanser Verlag, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Flores BE, Whybark DC (1987) Implementing multiple criteria ABC analysis. J Oper Manag 7(1 and 2):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu C-W, Liang G-S, Liao C-T (2008) Controlling inventory by combining ABC analysis and fuzzy classification. Comput Ind Eng 55:841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramanathan R (2004) ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Comput Oper Res 33:695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Partovi FY, Anandarajan M (2001) Classifying inventory using an artificial neural network approach. Comput Ind Eng 41:389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ernst R, Cohen MA (1990) Operations related groups (ORGs): a clustering procedure for production/inventory systems. J Oper Manag 9(4):574–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Almeida AT (2000) Multicriteria decision making on maintenance: spares and contracts planning. Eur J Oper Res 129:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrović D, Petrović R (1992) SPARTA II: further development in an expert system for advising on stocks of spare parts. Int J Prod Econ 24:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huiskonen J (2001) Maintenance spare parts logistics: special characteristics and strategic choices. Int J Prod Econ 71:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paaki J, Huiskonen J, Pirttilä T (2010) Improving global spare parts distribution chain performance through part categorization: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 133:164–171

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dekker R, Kleijn MJ, de Rooij PJ (1996) A spare parts stocking policy based on equipment criticality. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  21. Porras E, Dekker R (2006) An inventory control system for spare parts at a refinery: an empirical comparison of different re-order point methods. Eur J Oper Res 184:101–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Botter R, Fortuin L (2000) Stocking strategy for service parts—a case study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(6):656–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bošnjaković M (2010) Multicriteria inventory model for spare parts. Tech Gaz 17(4):499–504

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gajpal PP, Ganesh LS, Rajendran C (1994) Criticality analysis of spare parts using the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 35:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharaf MA, Helmy HA (2001) A classification model for inventory management of spare parts. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on production, industrial engineering, design and control, p 375–82

  26. Knut A (2005) Planung und Betrieb von Logistiknetzwerken: Unternehmensübergreifendes supply chain management; mit 27 Tabellen, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bose DC (2006) Inventory management. Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schawel C, Billing F (2012) Top 100 management tools: Das wichtigste Buch eines Managers: Von ABC-Analyse bis Zielvereinbarung, 4th edn. Springer Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  29. Skinner DC (2001) Introduction to decision analysis: a practitioner’s guide to improving decision quality, 2nd edn. Probabilistic Publishing, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harker PT (1989) The art and science of decision making: the analytic hierarchy process. In: Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT (eds) The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies. Springer, New York, pp 3–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Linkov I, Bakr Ramadian A (2004) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work was funded by the DFG within the research project “Evaluation and optimization of the serviceability” (LA 2351/23-1). We thank the DFG for promoting and facilitating the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Stoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoll, J., Kopf, R., Schneider, J. et al. Criticality analysis of spare parts management: a multi-criteria classification regarding a cross-plant central warehouse strategy. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 9, 225–235 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0602-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0602-2

Keywords

Navigation