Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and analyzing logistic inter-dependencies in industrial-enterprise logistics

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite spending considerable effort on the design and operation of production planning and control systems, manufacturing companies experience logistic performance deficits. Frequently, these are due to inconsistencies between the logistic objectives the companies set themselves and the planning and control actions they take to achieve the objectives. Analytical models of logistic processes are applied to obtain a better understanding of the process behavior. Models of this type often do not succeed in clearly establishing the relationships between the planning and control actions the processes can take and the logistic performance measures. The paper presents qualitative influence models that identify these interdependencies within individual logistic processes and across process boundaries. Coupled with a qualitative evaluation of the effects of the planning and control measures on the logistic performance of the processes, the models facilitate objective-oriented logistic performance management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deloitte research: global report—vision in manufacturing. Deloitte Research, New York (1998)

  2. Maurer A, Stark WA (2001) Steering carmaking into the 21st century: from today’s best practices to the transformed plants of 2020. Boston Consulting Group, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  3. Performance Measurement Group (2002) Achieving delivery performance: linking strategy, capabilities and results. Signals Perform 3(4):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wiendahl H-H, von Cieminski G, Wiendahl H-P (2005) Stumbling blocks of PPC: towards the holistic configuration of PPC systems. Prod Plann Control 16(7):634–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiendahl H-H (2006) Systematic analysis of PPC system deficiencies—analytical approach and consequences for PPC design. Ann CIRP 55(1):479–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buzacott JA, Shanthikumar JG (1993) Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Silver EA, Pyke DF, Peterson R et al (1998) Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopp WJ, Spearman ML et al (2000) Factory physics: foundations of manufacturing management, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nyhuis P, von Cieminski G, Fischer F (2005) Applying simulation and analytical models for logistic performance prediction. Ann CIRP 54(1):417–422

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nyhuis P, Wiendahl H-P et al (2007) Fundamentals of production logistics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. von Cieminski G (2008) Einsatz qualitativer Wirkmodelle zur Lenkung der industriellen Unternehmens-logistik. PhD thesis to be submitted to the Leibniz University of Hanover

  12. Supply Chain Council: supply-chain operations reference-model Version 8.0. http://www.supply-chain.org/galleries/default-file/SCOR%2080%20Overview%20Booklet2.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2007

  13. Wiendahl H-P et al (1998) Load-oriented manufacturing control, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ropohl G (1999) Allgemeine technologie: eine systemtheorie der technik, 2nd edn. Carl Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scholz-Reiter B, Windt K, Freitag M (2004) Autonomous logistic processes—new demands and first approaches. In: Proceedings of 37th CIRP ISMS, Budapest, Hungary, pp 357–362

  16. Lutz S, Lödding H, Wiendahl H-P (2003) Logistics-oriented inventory analysis. Int J Prod Econ 85(2):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lödding H et al (2005) Verfahren der Fertigungssteuerung: Grundlagen, Beschreibung, Konfiguration. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wiendahl H-P, Fastabend H (1997) Synchronization of logistic processes based on coupled operating curves. In: Proceedings of 29th CIRP ISMS, Osaka, Japan

  19. Wiendahl H-P, Ludwig E, Ullmann W (1994) Monitoring and diagnosis systems: new components of production planning and control—methodologies. Appl Exp Int Trans Oper Res 1(1):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isermann R et al (2005) Fault diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Naim MM, Childerhouse P, Disney SM, Towill DR (2002) A supply chain diagnostic methodology—determining the vector of change. Comput Ind Eng 43:135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McKinsey & Company (2002) Supply chain quick diagnostics. Logistik heute 24(7–8):34–35 (diagnostic tool on accompanying CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. von Cieminski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Cieminski, G., Nyhuis, P. Modeling and analyzing logistic inter-dependencies in industrial-enterprise logistics. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 1, 407–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-007-0068-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-007-0068-y

Keywords

Navigation