Abstract
In this letter to the Editor, the author reports his comment on the review article entitled. “Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics” published in this Journal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z (2024) Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics. Intern Emerg Med 19:37–47
Gringas Y (2016) Bibliometrics and research evaluation uses and abuses. The MIT Press
Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:16569–16572
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DR, writing an original draft, writing review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval, Human and animal rights statement and Informed consent
This study did not involve human participants, hence did not require ethical approval or informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ribatti, D. Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics—comment. Intern Emerg Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03586-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03586-8