Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal: reply

  • CE - LETTER TO THE EDITOR
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pelaccia T (2021) Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal: comment. Intern Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02650-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Corazza GR, Lenti MV, Howdle PD (2020) Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal. Intern Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02580-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowen JL (2006) Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 355:2217–2225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH (2003) Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Med Educ 37:695–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barais M, Hauswaldt J, Dinant GJ, van de Wiel M, Stolper CF, Van Royen P (2017) COGITA network has constructed a glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms. Eur J Gen Pract 23:53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Durning SJ, Ratcliffe T, Artino AR Jr et al (2013) How is clinical reasoning developed, maintained, and objectively assessed? Views from expert internists and internal medicine interns. J Contin Educ Health Prof 33:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is part of a project for the study of clinical complexity (SMAC study) funded by San Matteo Hospital Foundation—Italian Ministry of Health (Progetto di Ricerca Corrente 2017—PI Prof. Gino Roberto Corazza). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Clinica Medica, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    Gino Roberto Corazza & Marco Vincenzo Lenti

Authors
  1. Gino Roberto Corazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Vincenzo Lenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors participated in the drafting of the manuscript or critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and provided approval of the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gino Roberto Corazza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Statement of human and animal rights

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corazza, G.R., Lenti, M.V. Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal: reply. Intern Emerg Med 16, 529–530 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02665-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02665-4

Search

Navigation