Patients’ overestimation of their illness severity appears to contribute to the national epidemic of emergency department (ED) overcrowding. This study aims to elucidate which patient populations are more likely to have a higher estimation of illness severity (EIS). The investigator surveyed demographic factors of all non-urgent patients at an academic ED. The patients and physicians were asked to estimate the patients’ illness severity using a 1–10 scale with anchors. The difference of these values was taken and compared across patient demographic subgroups using a 2-sample t-test. One hundred and seventeen patients were surveyed. The mean patient EIS was 5.22 (IQR 4), while the mean physician EIS was less severe at 7.57 (IQR 3), a difference of 2.35 (p < 0.0001). Patient subgroups with the highest EIS compared to the physicians’ EIS include those who were self-referred (difference of 2.65, p = 0.042), with income ≤ $25,000 (difference of 2.96, p = 0.004), with less than a college education (difference of 2.83, p = 0.018), and with acute-on-chronic musculoskeletal pain (difference of 4.17, p = 0.001). If we assume the physicians’ EIS is closer to the true illness severity, patients with lower socioeconomic status, lower education status, who were self-referred, and who suffered from acute-on-chronic musculoskeletal pain are more likely to overestimate their illness severity and may contribute to non-urgent use of the ED. They may benefit from further education or resources for care to prevent ED misuse. The large difference of acute-on-chronic musculoskeletal pain may reflect a physician’s bias to underestimate the severity of a patients’ illness in this particular population.
Emergency department Overcrowding Non-urgent Illness severity
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Statement of human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2013 Emergency Department Summary TablesGoogle Scholar
Miró O, Antonio MT, Jiménez S, De Dios A, Sánchez M, Borrás A, Millá J (1999) Decreased health care quality associated with emergency department overcrowding. Eur J Emerg Med 6(2):105–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hing E, Bhuiya F (2012) Wait time for treatment in hospital emergency departments: 2009. NCHS Data Brief 102:1–8Google Scholar
Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, Gillen E, Mehrotra A (2013) Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care 19(1):47–59PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Sarver JH, Cydulka RK, Baker DW (2002) Usual source of care and nonurgent emergency department use. Acad Emerg Med 9(9):916–923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Campbell PA, Pai RK, Derksen DJ, Skipper B (1998) Emergency department use by family practice patients in an academic health center. Fam Med 30(4):272–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shesser R, Kirsch T, Smith J, Hirsch R (1991) An analysis of emergency department use by patients with minor illness. Ann Emerg Med 20(7):743–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Harris Interactive (2005) Emergency Department Utilization in California: Survey of Consumer Data and Physician DataGoogle Scholar
Young GP, Wagner MB, Kellermann AL, Ellis J, Bouley D (1996) Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments. Patterns and reasons for use. 24 Hours in the ED Study Group. JAMA 276(6):460–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Petersen LA, Burstin HR, O’Neil AC, Orav EJ, Brennan TA (1998) Nonurgent emergency department visits: the effect of having a regular doctor. Med Care 36(8):1249–1255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gilboy N TT, Travers D, Rosenau AM (2011) Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A Triage Tool for Emergency Department Care, Version 4. Implementation Handbook 2012 Edition. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0014. Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityGoogle Scholar
Kutner MG, Jin Y, Paulsen C (2006) The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. US Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, WashingtonGoogle Scholar