Screening and detection of delirium in older ED patients: performance of the modified Confusion Assessment Method for the Emergency Department (mCAM-ED). A two-step tool
- 1k Downloads
Delirium is frequent in older Emergency Department (ED) patients, but detection rates for delirium in the ED are low. To aid in identifying delirium, we developed and implemented a two-step systematic delirium screening and assessment tool in our ED: the modified Confusion Assessment Method for the Emergency Department (mCAM-ED). Components of the mCAM-ED include: (1) screening for inattention, the main feature of delirium, which was performed with the Months Backwards Test (MBT); (2) delirium assessment based on a structured interview with questions from the Mental Status Questionnaire by Kahn et al. and the Comprehension Test by Hart et al. The aims of our study are (1) to investigate the performance criteria of the mCAM-ED tool in a consecutive sample of older ED patients, (2) to evaluate the performance of the mCAM-ED in patients with and without dementia and (3) to test whether this tool is efficient in keeping evaluation time to a minimum and reducing screening and assessment burden on the patient. For this prospective validation study, we recruited a consecutive sample of ED patients aged 65 and older during an 11-day period in November 2015. Trained nurses assessed patients with the mCAM-ED. Results were compared to the reference standard [i.e. the geriatricians’ delirium diagnosis based on the criteria of the Text Revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR)]. Performance criteria were computed. We included 286 consecutive ED patients aged 65 and older. The median age was 80.02 (Q1 = 72.15; Q3 = 86.76), 58.7% of included patients were female, 14.3% had dementia. We found a delirium prevalence of 7.0%. In patients with dementia, specificity and positive likelihood ratio were lower. When compared to the reference standard, delirium assessment with the mCAM-ED has a 0.98 specificity and a 39.9 positive likelihood ratio. In 80.0% of all cases, the first step of the mCAM-ED, i.e. screening for inattention with the MBT, took less than 30 s. On average, the complete mCAM-ED assessment required 3.2 (SD 2.0), 5.6 (SD 3.2), and 6.2 (SD 2.3) minutes in cognitively unimpaired patients, patients with dementia and patients with dementia or delirium, respectively. The mCAM-ED is able to efficiently rule out delirium as well as confirm the diagnosis of delirium in elderly patients with and without dementia and applies minimal screening and assessment burden on the patient.
KeywordsAlgorithms Attention Delirium Dementia Prevalence Performance Emergency medicine
Florian F. Grossmann
Modified Confusion Assessment method for the Emergency Department
Mental Status Questionnaire
Modified Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale
We are thankful to all the ED staff, the geriatricians who performed the gold standard assessments, and Dr. Duncan Shabb for helpful discussions and proofreading the manuscript.
This study was funded through Scientific Funds of the University Hospital Basel.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with this study.
Statement of human rights
The study was approved by the cantonal ethics committee (identifier EKNZ-2015-123) and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT02782143). All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local/national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
If possible, oral informed consent was obtained directly from the patient or an authorized proxy. Due to the minimal risk, little burden and potential benefit to the patient, the ethics committee allowed patients to be assessed even if there was no chance to obtain informed patient consent due to the nature of delirium or availability of a proxy.
- 1.Association American Psychiatric, Task force on DSM-IV (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Wachington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 2.Elie M, Rousseau F, Cole M, Primeau F, McCusker J, Bellavance F (2000) Prevalence and detection of delirium in elderly emergency department patients. CMAJ 163(8):977–981. http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/abstract/2163/2008/2977. Retrieved July 2004
- 4.Grossmann FF, Hasemann W, Graber A, Bingisser R, Kressig RW, Nickel CH (2014) Screening, detection and management of delirium in the emergency department—a pilot study on the feasibility of a new algorithm for use in older emergency department patients: the modified Confusion Assessment Method for the Emergency Department (mCAM-ED). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 22(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-22-19 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Han JH, Eden S, Shintani A, Morandi A, Schnelle J, Dittus RS, Storrow AB, Ely EW (2011) Delirium in older emergency department patients is an independent predictor of hospital length of stay. Acad Emerg Med 18(5):451–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01065.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Morandi A, McCurley J, Vasilevskis EE, Fick DM, Bellelli G, Lee P, Jackson JC, Shenkin SD, Marcotrabucchi Schnelle J, Inouye SK, Ely EW, MacLullich A (2012) Tools to detect delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60(11):2005–2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04199.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Meagher J, Leonard M, Donoghue L, O’Regan N, Timmons S, Exton C, Cullen W, Dunne C, Adamis D, Maclullich AJ, Meagher D (2015) Months backward test: a review of its use in clinical studies. World J Psychiatry 5(3):305–314. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.305 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Inouye SK (2003) The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Training manual and coding guide. Yale University School of Medicine, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bellelli G, Morandi A, Davis DH, Mazzola P, Turco R, Gentile S, Ryan T, Cash H, Guerini F, Torpilliesi T, Del Santo F, Trabucchi M, Annoni G, MacLullich AM (2014) Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people. Age Ageing 43(4):496–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu021 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Morandi A, Han JH, Meagher D, Vasilevskis E, Cerejeira J, Hasemann W, MacLullich AM, Annoni G, Trabucchi M, Bellelli G (2016) Detecting Delirium Superimposed on Dementia: evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17(9):828–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Grossmann FF, Nickel CH, Christ M, Schneider K, Spirig R, Bingisser R (2011) Transporting clinical tools to new settings: cultural adaptation and validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German. Ann Emerg Med 57(3):257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Nemec M, Koller MT, Nickel CH, Maile S, Winterhalder C, Karrer C, Laifer G, Bingisser R (2010) Patients presenting to the emergency department with non-specific complaints: the Basel non-specific complaints (BANC) study. Acad Emerg Med 17(3):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00658.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Agresti A, Coull BA (1998) Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52(2):119–126Google Scholar
- 36.Hasemann W, Godwin J, Spirig R, Kressig RW, Frei IA, Tolson D (2013) Effects of the Interdisciplinary Basel Delirium and Dementia Prevention and Management Programme DEMDEL. Glasgow Caledonian University, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
- 37.Marcantonio ER, Ngo LH, O’Connor M, Jones RN, Crane PK, Metzger ED, Inouye SK (2014) 3D-CAM: derivation and validation of a 3-minute diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium: a cross-sectional diagnostic test study. Ann Intern Med 161(8):554–561. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-0865 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.O’Sullivan D, Brady N, Manning E, O’Shea E, O’Grady S, O’Regan N, Timmons S (2017) Validation of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test and the 4AT test for combined delirium and dementia screening in older Emergency Department attendees. Age Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx149 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Han JH, Wilson A, Vasilevskis EE, Shintani A, Schnelle JF, Dittus RS, Graves AJ, Storrow AB, Shuster J, Ely EW (2013) Diagnosing delirium in older emergency department patients: validity and reliability of the delirium triage screen and the brief confusion assessment method. Ann Emerg Med 62(5):457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.05.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Han JH, Wilson A, Graves AJ, Shintani A, Schnelle JF, Dittus RS, Powers JS, Vernon J, Storrow AB, Ely EW (2014) Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in older emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 21(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12309 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Richardson SJ, Davis DHJ, Bellelli G, Hasemann W, Meagher D, Kreisel SH, MacLullich AMJ, Cerejeira J, Morandi A (2017) Detecting delirium superimposed on dementia: diagnostic accuracy of a simple combined arousal and attention testing procedure. Int Psychogeriatr 27(10):1585–1593. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610217000916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Gaspardo P, Peressoni L, Comisso I, Mistraletti G, Ely EW, Morandi A (2014) Delirium among critically ill adults: evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Italian ‘Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit’. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 30(5):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2014.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar