Skip to main content
Log in

Variability of adverse events in the public health-care service of the Tuscany region

  • HTA - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study is to analyze the variation of adverse events (AEs) according to the different structure of hospitals. The study is a multicenter, retrospective study. It involves 4 teaching hospitals (THs) and 32 community hospitals, distributed in 12 local trusts (LTs), of the Tuscany Regional Healthcare Service (RHS). A random sample of the clinical records of patients admitted in LTs and THs in 2008 was selected from the database of the hospital discharge records of the centers. Among 11,293 clinical records included, a total of 354 adverse events were identified. There was a significant higher incidence of AEs in the male and elderly (>65 years) population, and the incidence of AEs was more relevant in the THs (5.3, 95% CI 4.7–6.1) than in the LTs (1.8, 95% CI 1.5–2.2). AEs related to falls were significantly more preventable in THs (OR 19.22, 95% CI 2.45–151.02), while in LTs, AEs related to infections were the most preventable (OR 6.22, 95% CI 1.35–28.67). Concerning the consequence of AE, death is significantly more probable for AEs related to unexpected cardiac arrest in LTs, while disability and prolongation of the stay are significantly more probable consequences associated with re-admission in THs, and to transfer to ICU or HDU in LTs. Re-interventions, surgical complications and falls are the factors more correlated with AEs. In conclusion, the study shows a higher risk of incurring adverse events for the THs compared to the LTs, presumably connected with a major complexity of the clinical cases. Furthermore, the preventability of AEs is higher in the LTs (56.1 vs 42.2%), and this might be associated with lower expertise in managing complications in these settings. Concerning specialties, there are no significant differences in AEs distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aranaz-Andrés JM, Aibar-Remón C, Vitaller-Murillo J, Ruiz-López P, Limón-Ramírez R, Terol-García E; ENEAS work group. Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events. J Epidemiol Community Health,62: 1022-1929

  2. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V et al (2004) the Canadian AEAEs study: the incidence of AEAEs among hospital patients in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 170:1678–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of AEs and negligence in hospitalized patients; results from the Harvard medical practice study. N Engl J Med 324:370–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R, Ali W, Scott A, Schug S (2002) AEs in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact. N Z Med J 115:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gawande A, Thomas EJ, Brennan MJ, Zinner TA (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical AEs in Utah and Colorado in 1992. Surgery 126:66–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Letaief M, Mhamdi S, El-Asady R, Siddiqi S, Abdullatif A (2010) AE in a Tunisian hospital: result of a retrospective color study. Int J Qual Health Care 22(5):380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendes W, Martins M, Rozenfeld S, Travassos C (2009) The assessment of AEAEs in hospitals in Brazil. Int J Qual Health Care 21(4):279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiøler T, Lipczak H, Pedersen BL, Mogensen TS, Bech KB, Stockmarr A, Svenning AR, Frølich A (2001) Danish AE study. Incidence of AEs in hospitals. A retrospective study of medical records. Ugeskr Laeger 163:1585–1586

    Google Scholar 

  9. Soop M, Fryksmark U, Koster M, Haglund B (2009) The incidence of AE in Swedish hospitals: a retrospective medical record review study. Int J Qual Health Care 21(4):285–291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson T, Runciman WB, Gibber RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD (1995) The quality in Australian healthcare study. Med J Aust 163:458–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Bellandi T et al (2012) AEs and potentially preventable consequences: retrospective study in five large Italian hospitals. Epidemiol Prev 36(3):152–162

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sommella L, de Waure C, Ferriero AM, Biasco A, Mainelli MT, Pinnarelli L, Ricciardi W, Damiani G (2014)

  13. The incidence of AEs in an Italian acute care hospital: findings of a two-stage method in a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res Aug 27;14:358. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-358

  14. Thomas EJ, John Orav E, Brennan Troyen A (2000) Hospitals Ownership and Preventable AEs. Gen InternMed 15:211–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kupersmith J (2005) Quality of Care in Teaching Hospitals: a Literature Review. Acad Med 80(5):458–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thornlow DK, Stukenborg George J (2006) The Association Between Hospital Characteristics and rates of Preventable Complications and AEs. Med Care 44(3):265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivard PE, Elixhauser A, Christiansen CL, Zhao Shibei, Rosen AK (2010) Testing the association between patient safety indicators and hospital structural characteristics in VA and non federal hospitals. Med Care Res Rev 67(3):321–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brand CA, Barker AL, Morello RT, Vitale MR, Evans SM, Scott IA, Stoelwinder JU, Cameron PA (2012) A review of hospitals characteristics associated with improved performance. Int. J Quality Health Care 24(5):483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cochran William G (1977) Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fleiss L, Levin B, Paik MC (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M (2001) AEs in British hospitals:

  22. Preliminary retrospective record review. British Medical Journal; 322: 517–519

  23. De Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital AEs: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17:216–220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Michel P, Quenon JL, de Sarasqueta AM, Scemama O (2004) Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of AEAEs and rates of preventable AEs in acute care hospitals. BMJ 328(7433):199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Charles V (2012) Sicurezza del paziente Italian Edition, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Bellandi, Milano, Springer-Verlag Italia

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our acknowledgments for the collaboration to all the reviewers involved and to the clinical risk managers of the THs and LTs: Giuseppe Opizzi e Aldo Silvani (Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca’Granda, Milano), Amalia Biasco, Silvana Cinalli, Luigi Pinnarelli, Maria Maddalena Sanna (Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Roma), Fiorenza Zotti, Maria Cassano, Sara Sblano, Lidia Dalfino (Policlinico di Bari), Alberto Farese, Elisabetta Magnelli, (AOU Careggi, Firenze), Annalaura Costa, Elena Belli, Francesca Battisti and Simona Frangioni (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Pisa).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Albolino.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Health with the national program PS 8 “Approcci di sistema per la gestione del rischio” CUP E35J09000030001.

Ethics approval

The authors sought ethics approval for the study to the Regional Research Ethic Review Board, but the Ethics Review Board determined that this study was exempt. Thus, according to the Italian legislation (law 211/2003) and the regional procedures, the Regional Research Ethic Review Board stated that the study do not need ethic approval as it attains to clinical research studies and does not provide statements on observational studies on routine collected, anonymous data. Data were extracted from routinely collected administrative databases and there was no need to obtain additional data from individual patients. The interventions under study were performed in ordinary conditions, irrespective of the conduct of the present study. Because this was an observational retrospective study, patients had already been treated when the study protocol was written. Data linkage to the patients was performed by using numerical codes, and researchers had access only to an anonymous dataset, which ensured patients’ privacy. For these reasons, no personal informed consent to the present analysis was requested from the study participants. The permission for medical record consultation was given by the Medical Directions of hospitals involved in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

No animal studies were conducted. We followed the Helsinki Declaration and its amendments and followed all standard national and international ethical standards.

Informed consent

No personal informed consent to the present analysis was requested from the study participants. The permission for medical records consultation was given by the Medical Directions of hospitals involved in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albolino, S., Tartaglia, R., Bellandi, T. et al. Variability of adverse events in the public health-care service of the Tuscany region. Intern Emerg Med 12, 1033–1042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1698-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1698-5

Keywords

Navigation