The Internet has fundamentally changed the publishing of scholarly peer reviewed journals, and the way readers find and access articles. Digital access is nowadays the norm, in particular for researchers. The Internet has enabled a totally new business model, Open Access (OA), in which an article is openly available in full text for anyone with Internet access. This article reviews the different options to achieve this, whether by journals changing their revenue structures from subscription to publishing charges, or authors utilizing a number of options for posting OA versions of article manuscripts in repositories. It also discusses the regrettable emergence of “predatory” publishers, who spam academics, and make money by promising them rapid publication with only the semblance of peer review. The situation is further discussed from the viewpoints of different stakeholders, including academics as authors and readers, practicing physicians and the general public.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Moher D, Moher E (2016) Stop predatory publishers now. Ann Intern Med 164:616–617
Vinny P, Vishnu V (2016) Trends in scientific publishing: dark clouds loom large. J Neurol Sci 363:119–120
Suber P (2012) Open Access. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Available OA at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262517638_Open_Access_PDF_Version.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Pampel H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S (2014). Open research data: from vision to practice. In: Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) Opening science (213–224). Springer, Berlin. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_14/fulltext.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Royal Society (2011) Knowledge, networks and nations global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. The Royal Society, London. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/knowledge-networks-nations/report/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Ware M, Mabe M (2015) The STM Report, an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague. http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Houghton J, Rasmussen B, Sheehan P, Oppenheim C, Morris A, Creaser C, Greenwood H, Summers M, Gourlay A (2009) Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits. Joint Information Systems Committee, UK. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/4137. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Schimmer R, Geschuhn K, Vogler A (2015) Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access, Max Planck Digital Library, Munich. doi:10.17617/1.3
Laakso M, Björk B-C (2012) Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Med 10:124. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-124
Kiley R (2015). The reckoning: an analysis of Wellcome Trust open access spend 2013–2014. Wellcome Trust, London. http://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2015/03/03/the-reckoning-an-analysis-of-wellcome-trust-open-access-spend-2013-14/5. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Mellon Foundation (2016) Pay it forward—investigating a sustainable model of open access charges for large North American research institutions, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, New York. http://icis.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/UC-Pay-It-Forward-Final-Report.rev_.7.18.16.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Economist (2013) Academic publishing: free-for-all, open-access scientific publishing is gaining ground, The Economist, May 14th 2013. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21577035-open-access-scientific-publishing-gaining-ground-free-all
Van Noorden R (2013) Half of 2013 papers now free to read. Nature 500:386–387. doi:10.1038/500386a
Eisen M (2015) The inevitable failure of parasitic green open access. Blog post, 25 May 2015. http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1710
Laakso M (2015) Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99:475–494
De Groote SL, Shultz M, Smalheiser NR (2015) Examining the impact of the National Institutes of Health public access policy on the citation rates of journal articles. PLoS One 10:e0139951. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139951
Callaway E (2016) Biology’s big funders boost eLife. Nature 534:14–15. doi:10.1038/534014a
Finch J (2012) Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. Research Information Network, UK. http://www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
RIN (2015) Monitoring the transition to open access, Research Information Network, UK. http://www.researchinfonet.org/oamonitoring/
Björk B-C (2016) The open access movement at a crossroads—are the big publishers and academic social media taking over? Learn Publish 29:131–134
OpenDOAR (2016) Directory of Open Access Repositories, UK. http://www.opendoar.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Binfield P (2015) PLOS ONE and the Rise of the open access megajournal, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, Japan. http://www.nii.ac.jp/sparc/en/event/2011/pdf/20120229_doc3_binfield.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Beall J (2017) Beall’s list: potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
DOAJ (2017) Directory of open access journals. https://doaj.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Wagner A (2010) Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in science and technology librarianship, 60. http://www.istl.org/10-winter/article2.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Swan A (2010) The open access citation advantage: studies and results to date, school of electronics and computer science, University of Southampton, UK. http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/716-Alma-Swan-Review-of-Studies-on-Open-Access-Impact-Advantage.html). Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Ryen W, Horvitz E (2009) Cyberchondria: studies of the escalation of medical concerns in web search. ACM Trans Inf Syst 27:1. doi:10.1145/1629096.1629101
Cochrane (2016) Strategy to 2020. http://community.cochrane.org/organizational-info/resources/support-cet-csg/strategy-2020. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
I am grateful to my wife, M.D. Ulla Björk, who is a clinician specialized in internal medicine, and who provided useful comments to improve the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Björk, B. Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges. Intern Emerg Med 12, 247–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2
- Scientific journal
- Business model
- Open access