Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges
- 1.4k Downloads
The Internet has fundamentally changed the publishing of scholarly peer reviewed journals, and the way readers find and access articles. Digital access is nowadays the norm, in particular for researchers. The Internet has enabled a totally new business model, Open Access (OA), in which an article is openly available in full text for anyone with Internet access. This article reviews the different options to achieve this, whether by journals changing their revenue structures from subscription to publishing charges, or authors utilizing a number of options for posting OA versions of article manuscripts in repositories. It also discusses the regrettable emergence of “predatory” publishers, who spam academics, and make money by promising them rapid publication with only the semblance of peer review. The situation is further discussed from the viewpoints of different stakeholders, including academics as authors and readers, practicing physicians and the general public.
KeywordsScientific journal Business model Open access
I am grateful to my wife, M.D. Ulla Björk, who is a clinician specialized in internal medicine, and who provided useful comments to improve the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Suber P (2012) Open Access. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Available OA at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262517638_Open_Access_PDF_Version.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 4.Pampel H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S (2014). Open research data: from vision to practice. In: Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) Opening science (213–224). Springer, Berlin. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_14/fulltext.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 5.Royal Society (2011) Knowledge, networks and nations global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. The Royal Society, London. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/knowledge-networks-nations/report/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 6.Ware M, Mabe M (2015) The STM Report, an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague. http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 7.Houghton J, Rasmussen B, Sheehan P, Oppenheim C, Morris A, Creaser C, Greenwood H, Summers M, Gourlay A (2009) Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits. Joint Information Systems Committee, UK. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/4137. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 8.Schimmer R, Geschuhn K, Vogler A (2015) Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access, Max Planck Digital Library, Munich. doi:10.17617/1.3Google Scholar
- 10.Kiley R (2015). The reckoning: an analysis of Wellcome Trust open access spend 2013–2014. Wellcome Trust, London. http://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2015/03/03/the-reckoning-an-analysis-of-wellcome-trust-open-access-spend-2013-14/5. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 11.Mellon Foundation (2016) Pay it forward—investigating a sustainable model of open access charges for large North American research institutions, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, New York. http://icis.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/UC-Pay-It-Forward-Final-Report.rev_.7.18.16.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 12.Economist (2013) Academic publishing: free-for-all, open-access scientific publishing is gaining ground, The Economist, May 14th 2013. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21577035-open-access-scientific-publishing-gaining-ground-free-all
- 14.Eisen M (2015) The inevitable failure of parasitic green open access. Blog post, 25 May 2015. http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1710
- 18.Finch J (2012) Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. Research Information Network, UK. http://www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 19.RIN (2015) Monitoring the transition to open access, Research Information Network, UK. http://www.researchinfonet.org/oamonitoring/
- 21.OpenDOAR (2016) Directory of Open Access Repositories, UK. http://www.opendoar.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 22.Binfield P (2015) PLOS ONE and the Rise of the open access megajournal, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, Japan. http://www.nii.ac.jp/sparc/en/event/2011/pdf/20120229_doc3_binfield.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 23.Beall J (2017) Beall’s list: potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 24.DOAJ (2017) Directory of open access journals. https://doaj.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 25.Wagner A (2010) Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in science and technology librarianship, 60. http://www.istl.org/10-winter/article2.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 26.Swan A (2010) The open access citation advantage: studies and results to date, school of electronics and computer science, University of Southampton, UK. http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/716-Alma-Swan-Review-of-Studies-on-Open-Access-Impact-Advantage.html). Accessed 20 Dec 2016
- 28.Cochrane (2016) Strategy to 2020. http://community.cochrane.org/organizational-info/resources/support-cet-csg/strategy-2020. Accessed 20 Dec 2016