Abstract
To evaluate the outcomes in first pass success (FPS) of GlideScope (GVL) intubations over a seven-year period in an academic ED. Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED with a level 1 trauma center over the seven-year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014. Following each intubation, the operator completed a standardized data collection form that included information on patient, operator and procedure characteristics. The primary outcome was first pass success, defined as successful intubation with a single laryngoscope blade insertion. The secondary outcome was the Cormack–Lehane (CL) view of the airway. To adjust for important confounders, a logistic regression model was used to determine the association between academic year and first pass success. In the first year of the study, the first pass success with the GVL was 75.6 % (68/90; 95 % CI 65.4–84.0 %) and the percentage of patients with CL I/II views was 95.6 % (86/90; 95 % CI 89.0–98.8 %). By the seventh year of the study, the first pass success with the GVL increased to 92.1 % (128/139; 95 % CI 86.3–96.0 %) and the percentage of patients with CL I/II views was 94.2 % (131/139; 95 % CI 89.0–97.5 %). In the logistic regression model, first pass success improved during the seven-year period (aOR 3.1; 95 % CI 1.3–7.1; p = 0.008). Over the seven-year period, there was significant improvement in the first pass success of the GVL, without any change in the Cormack–Lehane view, suggesting that there was improvement in the skill of tube delivery with use of the GVL over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lim HC, Goh SH (2009) Utilization of a Glidescope videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubations in different emergency airway management settings. Eur J Emerg Med 16(2):68–73. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328303e1c6
Choi HJ, Kang HG, Lim TH, Chung HS, Cho J, Oh YM, Kim YM (2010) Endotracheal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope by emergency physicians: a multicentre analysis of 345 attempts in adult patients. Emerg Med J EMJ 27(5):380–382. doi:10.1136/emj.2009.073460
Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, Keim SM (2012) Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med 42(4):400–405. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.019
Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, Sakles JC (2012) Difficult airway management in the emergency department: glidescope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med 42(6):629–634. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.007
Mosier J, Chiu S, Patanwala AE, Sakles JC (2013) A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 61(4):414–420.e411. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.001
Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, Snowden B, Glickman LT, Hendey GW (2009) A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 16(9):866–871. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00492.x
Yeatts DJ, Dutton RP, Hu PF, Chang YW, Brown CH, Chen H, Grissom TE, Kufera JA, Scalea TM (2013) Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75(2):212–219. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318293103d
Sakles JC, Kalin L (2012) The effect of stylet choice on the success rate of intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 19(2):235–238. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01271.x
Walls RM, Samuels-Kalow M, Perkins A (2010) A new maneuver for endotracheal tube insertion during difficult GlideScope intubation. J Emerg Med 39(1):86–88. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.11.005
Sakles JC, Patanwala AE, Mosier J, Dicken J, Holman N (2014) Comparison of the reusable standard GlideScope (R) video laryngoscope and the disposable cobalt GlideScope video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in an academic emergency department: a retrospective review. Acad Emerg Med 21(4):408–415. doi:10.1111/acem.12351
Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM (2011) The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med 57(3):240–247. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.035
Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA (2005) Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 52(2):191–198
Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT (2012) Glidescope video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 59(1):41–52. doi:10.1007/s12630-011-9620-5
Conflict of interest
We have no conflict of interest to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakles, J.C., Mosier, J., Patanwala, A.E. et al. Improvement in GlideScope® Video Laryngoscopy performance over a seven-year period in an academic emergency department. Intern Emerg Med 9, 789–794 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1122-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1122-3