Abstract
In this study I have compared classic and fuzzy logic and their usefulness in clinical diagnosis. The theory of probability is often considered a device to protect the classical two-valued logic from the evidence of its inadequacy to understand and show the complexity of world [1]. This can be true, but it is not possible to discard the theory of probability. I will argue that the problems and the application fields of the theory of probability are very different from those of fuzzy logic. After the introduction on the theoretical bases of fuzzy approach to logic, I have reported some diagnostic argumentations employing fuzzy logic. The state of normality and the state of disease often fight their battle on scalar quantities of biological values and it is not hard to establish a correspondence between the biological values and the percent values of fuzzy logic. Accordingly, I have suggested some applications of fuzzy logic in clinical diagnosis and in particular I have utilised a fuzzy curve to recognise subjects with diabetes mellitus, renal failure and liver disease. The comparison between classic and fuzzy logic findings seems to indicate that fuzzy logic is more adequate to study the development of biological events. In fact, fuzzy logic is useful when we have a lot of pieces of information and when we dispose to scalar quantities. In conclusion, increasingly the development of technology offers new instruments to measure pathological parameters through scalar quantities, thus it is reasonable to think that in the future fuzzy logic will be employed more in clinical diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kosko B (1993) Fuzzy thinking: the new science of fuzzy logic. Hyperion, New York, pp 1–350
Federspil G (1994) Logica clinica. I principi del metodo in medicina. McGraw-Hill, Milan, pp 1–300
Łukasiewicz J (1987) O zasadzie sprzecznosci u Arystotelesa. PWN, Warszawa. In Italian: Franci G, Testi CA (2003) (eds) Del principio di contraddizione in Aristotele. Quodlibet, Milano, pp 1–180
Black M (1937) Vagueness: an exercise in logical analysis. Philos Sci 4:427–455
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Contr 8:338–353
American Diabetes Association (2002) Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:S21–S24
De Finetti B (1989) La logica dell’incerto. Mondadori, Milano, pp 1–300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Licata, G. Probabilistic and fuzzy logic in clinical diagnosis. Int Emergency Med 2, 100–106 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-007-0051-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-007-0051-9