Abstract
The changes in the levels of proline, sugar and soluble protein during leaf rolling and its relationship to osmotic adjustment were studied in laboratory conditions. Upon irrigation of plants which have rolled leaves, many sugar crystals occurred on the abaxial surface of the leaves in Ctenanthe setosa (Rosc.) Eichler. The sugar crystals were determined to have sucrose, glucose and fructose. The levels of reducing sugars and proline are higher in rolled leaves while soluble protein levels in rolled leaves are lower than those of unrolled leaves. It was found 1–3, 9–13, 16–21 and 24–28 crystals at degree of leaf rolling 23, 28, 47 and 52%, respectively. Finally, we found a significant correlation between the crystal number and degree of leaf rolling in Ctenanthe setosa. In addition, soluble sugars are found predominant accumulating solute in the plant and are of major importance as a contributor to osmotic adjustment during leaf rolling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates L.S., Waldren R. P., Teare I. D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil., 39: 205–207.
Binzel M. L., Hasegawa P. M., Rhodes D., Handa S., Handa A. K., Bressan R. A. 1987. Solute accumulation in tobacco cells adapted to NaCl. Plant Physiol., 84: 1408–1415.
Binzel M. L., Hess F. D., Bressan R. A., Hasegawa P. M. 1989. Mechanisms of adaptation to salinity in cultured glycophyte cells. In: Environmental Stress in Plants, ed. by J. H. Cherry, NATO ASI Series, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: 139–158.
Bradford M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248–254.
Cutler J. M., Shahan K. W., Steponkus P. L. 1980. Alteration of the internal water relations of rice in response to drought hardening. Crop Sci., 20: 307–310.
Dove L. D. 1968. Nitrogen distribution in tomato plants during drought (Lycopersicon esculentum M.). Phyton, 25: 49–52.
Goodwin T. W., Mercer E. I. 1986. Introduction to plant biochemistry. Pergamon Press, Oxford-New York.
Gzik A. 1996. Accumulation of proline and pattern of α-amino acids in sugar beet plants in response to osmotic, water and salt stress. Env. Exp. Bot., 36: 29–38.
Handa S., Bressan R. A., Handa A. K., Carpita N. C., Hasegawa P. M. 1983. Solutes contributing to osmotic adjustment in cultured plant cells adapted to water stress. Plant Physiol., 73: 834–843.
Handa A. K., Hasegawa P. M., Bressan R. A. 1986. Proline accumulation and the adaptation of cultured plant cells to water stress. Plant Physiol., 80: 935–945.
Hanson A. D. 1980. Interpreting the metabolic responses of plants to water stress. Hortic., Sci., 15: 623–629.
Harborne J. B. 1973. Phytochemical Methods. Chapman and Hall, London.
Hasegawa P. M., Bressan R. A., Handa S., Handa A. K. 1984. Cellular mechanisms of tolerance to water stress. HortSci., 19: 371–377.
Hsiao T. C. 1970. Rapid changes in levels of polyribosomes in Zea mays in response to water stress. Plant Physiol., 46: 281–285.
Hsiao T. C., O’Toole J. C., Yambao E. B., Turner N. C. 1984. Influence of osmotic adjustment on leaf rolling and tissue death in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol., 75: 338–341.
Huff A.K., Ross C.W. 1975. Promotion of radish cotyledon enlargement and reducing sugar content by zeatin and red light. Plant Physiol., 56: 429–433.
Jones M. M., Rawson H. M. 1979. Influence of rate of development of leaf water deficits upon photosynthesis, leaf conductance, water use efficiency, and osmotic potential in Sorghum. Physiol. Plant., 45: 103–111.
Kirchoff B. K., Kennedy H. 1985. Foliar, nonstructural nectaries in the Marantaceae. Can. J. Plant Physiol., 63: 1785–1788.
Laemmli U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature., 227: 680–685.
Lee-Stadelmann O. Y., Stadelmann E. J. 1976. Cell permeability and water stress. In: Water and Plant Life: Problems and Modern Approaches, ed. by O. L. Lange, L. Kappen, E. D. Schulze, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 268–280.
Ludlow M. M. 1980. Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. In: Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress, ed. by N. C. Turner, P. J. Kramer, Wiley Interscience, New York: 123–138.
Meyer R. F., Boyer J. S. 1972. Sensitivity of cell division and cell elongation to low water potentials in soybean hypocotyls. Planta., 108: 77–87.
Omarova E. I., Bogdanova E. D., Polimbetova F. A. 1995. Regulation of water loss by the leaves of soft winter wheat with different organization of leaf structure. Fiziol. Rast., 42: 383–385.
O’Toole J. C., Cruz R. T. 1980. Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf water to stress. Plant Physiol., 65: 428–432.
Premachandra G. S., Saneoka H., Fujita K., Ogata S. 1993. Water stress and potassium fertilization in field grown maize (Zea mays L.): Effect of leaf water relations and leaf rolling. J. Agr. Crop Sci., 170: 195–201.
Ross A. I. 1959. Dinitrophenol Method for Reducing Sugars. First Edition, The Avi. Publishing Company, Wesport.
Sewell P. A. Clarke B. 1987. Chromatographic Separations. Thomas Polytechnic, London.
Sharp R. E., Davies W. J. 1979. Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water stressed maize plants. Planta., 147: 43–49.
Singh T. N., Paleg L. G., Aspinall D. 1973. Stress metabolism. III. Variations in response to water deficit in the barley plant. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 26: 65–76.
Sivaramakrishnan S., Patell V. Z., Flower D. J., Peacock J. M. 1988. Proline accumulation and nitrate reductase activity in contrasting Sorghum lines during mid-season drought stress. Physiol. Plant., 74: 418–426.
Turgut R., Kadioglu A. 1998. The effect of drought, temperature and irradiation on leaf rolling in Ctenanthe setosa. Biol. Plant. 41(4): 629–633.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kadioğlu, A., Turgut, R. Some biochemical changes during leaf rolling in Ctenanthe setosa (Marantaceae) . Acta Physiol Plant 21, 209–214 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-999-0034-8
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-999-0034-8