Abstract
Production of virus-free plants, along with growth and frequent harvesting of tubers without destroying plants are believed to be the main factors associated with the increase in the yield and production efficiency of potatoes. The present study aimed to produce virus-free potato plantlets and draw a comparison between aeroponic system and soil culture concerning the production efficiency of minitubers from healthy plants. Additionally, an aeroponic system was designed and built herein under the production conditions in Iran. In this study, the combination of thermotherapy and shoot tip culture was used for the production of virus-free plantlets of Satina cultivar, followed by micropropagation to increase the number of virus-free plantlets. Subsequently, the derived plantlets were cultivated either in the soil or under aeroponic conditions for growth and tuber production. Certain parameters, including the main stem length, root length, number of stems, area of the largest leaf, minituber number, and weight of each plant were evaluated. The results showed that the plants grown under the aeroponic condition had a significantly higher number of shoots (6.50) and higher shoot length (124.87 cm), roots length (49.50 cm), and leaf area (16.45cm2) compared to those of soil cultivation, in which these values were 4.25, 113.50 cm, 22.62 cm, and 9.08 cm2, respectively. In fact, the plants grown applying aeroponic system produced a significantly higher yield (112.78 vs. 17.07 g), minituber weight (11.21 vs. 2.81 g), and number (10.05 vs. 6.05) than those cultivated in soil. The aeroponically grown plants had a significantly higher number of roots and stem, as well as higher roots length and leaf area than those cultivated in the soil. In the current work, easy access to nutrition, further root aeration, and frequent minitubers harvesting without destroying plants could be considered as the most important factors indicating aeroponic system superiority. Hence, this system could be introduced as a suitable method with higher efficiency than soil cultivation for potato minituber production. On account of the possibility of selecting tubers with the desired size at the harvest time, the harvested minitubers in the aeroponic group had a more uniform size compared with those in the soil culture group. The fact that, during the harvest, the tubers were not scratched and the soil particles did not stick to the surface of the minituber, not only reduced the cost and time of preparation process after harvesting, but also significantly contributed to increasing the marketing characteristics of the tubers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ahloowalia B (1994) Production and performance of potato mini-tubers. Euphytica 75(3):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025600
AlMaarri K, Massa R, AlBiski F (2012) Evaluation of some therapies and meristem culture to eliminate potato Y potyvirus from infected potato plants. Plant Biotechnol 29(3):237–243. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.12.0215a
Altaf Hossain M, Abdullah-Al-Mahmud Abdullah-Al-Mamun M, Shamimuzzaman M, Mizanur Rahman M (2015) Optimization of minituber size and planting distance for the breeder seed production of potato. Am J Agric for 3(2):58–64. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20150302.18
Bag T, Srivastava A, Yadav S, Gurjar M, Diengdoh L, Rai R, Singh S (2015) Potato (Solanum tuberosum) aeroponics for quality seed production in north eastern Himalayan region of India. Indian J Agric Sci 85(10):1360–1364
Barker BTP (1922) Studies on root development. Long Ashton Res Stn Annu Rep 1921:9–57
Broćić Z, Milinković M, Momčilović I, Poštić D, Oljača J, Veljković B, Milošević D (2018) Production of potato mini-tubers in the aeroponic growing system. J Process Energy Agric 22(1):49–52. https://doi.org/10.5937/JPEA1801049B
Broćić Z, Milinković M, Momčilović I, Oljača J, Veljković B, Milošević D, Poštić D (2019) Comparison of aeroponics and conventional production system of virus-free potato mini tubers in Serbia. AГPOЗHAЊE 20(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.7251/AGREN1902095B
Buckseth T, Sharma A, Pandey K, Singh B, Muthuraj R (2016) Methods of pre-basic seed potato production with special reference to aeroponics—a review. Sci Hortic 204:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.041
Bussan AJ, Mitchell PD, Copas ME, Drilias MJ (2007) Evaluation of the effect of density on potato yield and tuber size distribution. Crop Sci 47(6):2462–2472. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.01.0026
Çalışkan ME, Yavuz C, Yağız AK, Demirel U, Çalışkan S (2021) Comparison of aeroponics and conventional potato mini tuber production systems at different plant densities. Potato Res 64(1):41–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09463-z
Calori AH, Factor TL, Feltran JC, Watanabe EY, Moraes CCD, Purquerio LFV (2018) Seed potato minituber production in an aeroponic system under tropical conditions: electrical conductivity and plant density. J Plant Nutr 41(17):2200–2209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1497652
Chae WB, Ahn SJ, Choi HS, Kwack YB, Goo DH, Jeong MI (2008) Tuber yield and size distribution of potato “Dejima” (Solanum tuberosum L) affected by stem cutting ages and harvest time in aeroponics. J Bio-Env Con 17(4):261–265
Chandra S, Khan S, Avula B, Lata H, Yang MH, ElSohly MA, Khan IA (2014) Assessment of total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant properties, and yield of aeroponically and conventionally grown leafy vegetables and fruit crops: a comparative study. Evid Based Complement Altern. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/253875
Chang DC, Park CS, Kim SY, Kim SJ, Lee YB (2008) Physiological growth responses by nutrient interruption in aeroponically grown potatoes. Am J Potato Res 85(5):315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-008-9024-4
Clawson J, Hoehn A, Stodieck L, Todd P, Stoner R (2000) Re-examining Aeroponics for Spaceflight Plant Growth. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2507. https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-2507.
Dimante I, Gaile Z, Mežaka I (2019) The effect of minituber weight on their field performance under a Northern European environment. Agron Res 17(2):396–407. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.063
Eldridge BM, Manzoni LR, Graham CA, Rodgers B, Farmer JR, Dodd AN (2020) Getting to the roots of aeroponic indoor farming. New Phytol 228(4):1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16780
Faccioli G (2001) Control of potato viruses using meristem and stem-cutting cultures, thermotherapy and chemotherapy. Virus and virus-like diseases of potatoes and production of seed-potatoes. Springer, Berlin, pp 365–390
Farran I, Mingo-Castel AM (2006) Potato minituber production using aeroponics: effect of plant density and harvesting intervals. Am J Potato Res 83(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869609
Filgueira FARF (2003) Solanáceas: agrotecnologia moderna na produção de tomate, batata, pementão, pimenta, beringela e jiló. Ufla
Georgakis D, Karafyllidis D, Stavropoulos N, Nianiou E, Vezyroglou I (1996) Efect of planting density and size of potato seed-minitubers on the size of the produced potato seed tubers. Paper presented at the I Balkan Symposium On Vegetables and Potatoes 462. p. 935–942. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.462.149
Hayden A, Yokelsen T, Giacomelli G, Hoffmann J (2002) Aeroponics: An alternative production system for high-value root crops. Paper presented at the XXVI International Horticultural Congress: The Future for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 629, p. 207–213. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.629.27
Kang J, Yang S, Kim S (1996) Effects of nitrogen levels on the plant growth, tuberization and quality of potatoes grown in aeroponics. J Korean Soc Hort Sci 37:761–766
Knowles NR, Knowles LO (2006) Manipulating stem number, tuber set, and yield relationships for Northern-and Southern-grown potato seed lots. Crop Sci 46(1):284–296. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.05-0078
Lakhiar IA, Gao J, Syed TN, Chandio FA, Buttar NA (2018) Modern plant cultivation technologies in agriculture under controlled environment: a review on aeroponics. J Plant Interact 13(1):338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1472308
Linhares MAPS, Garcia LC, Gomes JA, Farias A, Neto PHW, Rocha CH, De Souza NM (2021) Seed sweet potato production in aeroponics. Int J Dev Res 11(10):51256–51261. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.22990.10.2021
Loebenstein G, Berger PH, Brunt AA (2001) Virus and virus-like diseases of potatoes and production of seed-potatoes. Springer Science Business Media
Mateus-Rodriguez JR, de Haan S, Andrade-Piedra JL, Maldonado L, Hareau G, Barker I, Chuquillanqui C et al (2013) Technical and economic analysis of aeroponics and other systems for potato mini-tuber production in Latin America. Am J Potato Res 90(4):357–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9312-5
Mateus-Rodriguez J, De Haan S, Rodríguez-Delfín A (2014) Genotype by environment effects on Potato mini-tuber seed production in an aeroponics system. Agronomy 4(4):514–528. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy4040514
Mbiyu MW, Lung’aho C, Otieno SA, Nyongesa MW, Muchui MN, Ogemma JN (2018) Performance of five potato varieties with regards to growth and production of mini-tubers under an aeroponic system in central highlands of Kenya. Afr J Agric Res 13(8):366–378. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2017.12762
Millam S, Sharma SK (2007) Soil-free techniques. In: Vreugdenhil D (ed) Potato biology and biotechnology: advances and perspectives. Elsevier, pp 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451018-1/50074-9
Nugaliyadde M, De Silva H, Sangakkara U, Perera R, Ariyaratna D (2005) An aeroponic system for the production of pre-basic seeds of potato. Ann Sri Lanka Dep Agric 7(1):199–208
Özkaynak E, Samanci B (2006) Field performance of potato minituber weights at different planting dates: (Felderträge von Kartoffelknollen unterschiedlicher Pflanzzeiträume). Arch Agron Soil Sci Science 52(3):333–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340600676552
Ritter E, Angulo B, Riga P, Herran C, Relloso J, San Jose M (2001) Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers. Potato Res 44(2):127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410099
Rolot JL, Seutin H (1999) Soilless production of potato minitubers using a hydroponic technique. Potato Res 42(3–4):457–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358162
Rykaczewska K (2016) Field performance of potato minitubers produced in aeroponic culture. Plant Soil Environ 62(11):522–526. https://doi.org/10.17221/419/2016-PSE
Sabzevar RF, Mirabdulbaghi M, Zarghami R, Sardrood BP (2007) Mini-tuber production as affected by planting bed composition and node position in tissue cultured plantlet in two potato cultivars. Int J Agric Biol 9:416–418
Sembiring A, Murtiningsih R, Sahat J, Hartanto S (2021) GO potato aeroponic seed production in Indonesia, producers’ perception toward the benefits and challenges. IOP Conf Ser 948(1):012086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/948/1/012086
Singh P, Singh S, Sharma K (2020) Evaluation of performance of popular cultivars of potato under aeroponic conditions. Ann Biol 36(3):412–417
Souret FF, Weathers PJ (2000) The growth of saffron (Crocus sativus L) in aeroponics and hydroponics. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 7(3):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J044v07n03_04
Statistics F (2018) World food and agriculture—statistical pocketbook. FAO, Rome, Italy
Stoner R, Schorr S (1983) Aeroponics versus bed and hydroponic propagation [The process of propagating and growing plants in air]. Florists’ review, USA
Struik PC (2007) The canon of potato science: 25. Minitubers Potato Res 50(3–4):305–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9051-z
Struik PC, Wiersema SG (1999) Seed potato technology. Wageningen Academic Publishers
Tierno R, Carrasco A, Ritter E, de Galarreta JIR (2014) Differential growth response and minituber production of three potato cultivars under aeroponics and greenhouse bed culture. Am J Potato Res 91(4):346–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9354-8
Tunio MH, Gao J, Shaikh SA, Lakhiar IA, Qureshi WA, Solangi KA, Chandio FA (2020) Potato production in aeroponics: an emerging food growing system in sustainable agriculture forfood security. Chil J Agric Res 80(1):118–132. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392020000100118
Valkonen JP (2007) Viruses: economical losses and biotechnological potential. In Potato biology and biotechnology. Elsevier, Science BV, pp 619-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451018-1/50070-1
Vreugdenhil D, Struik PC (1989) An integrated view of the hormonal regulation of tuber formation in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Physiol Plant 75(4):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb05619.x
Wang B, Ma Y, Zhang Z, Wu Z, Wu Y, Wang Q, Li M (2011) Potato viruses in China. Crop Prot 30(9):1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.04.001
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Each of authors contributed to this study as following: SH performed the overall of experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. RZ designed the project and supervised the experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participants
We agree to participate in this research study.
Consent for publications
We agree to publish the article entitled “Comparison of minituber production in designed aeroponic system and soil cultivation” in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum journal.
Additional information
Communicated by B. Zheng.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hasrak, S., Zarghami, R. Comparison of minituber production in designed aeroponic system and soil cultivation. Acta Physiol Plant 45, 57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03537-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03537-4