Advertisement

Maize seed cryo-storage modifies chlorophyll, carotenoid, protein, aldehyde and phenolics levels during early stages of germination

  • Melissa Arguedas
  • Daviel Gómez
  • Lázaro Hernández
  • Florent Engelmann
  • Raffaele Garramone
  • Inaudis Cejas
  • Lourdes Yabor
  • Marcos Edel Martínez-Montero
  • José Carlos Lorenzo
Short Communication

Abstract

We recorded the crypreservation effects (direct immersion) on various parameters of early germination stages of maize seeds (0, 7 and 14 days). Percentages of germination; fresh mass of different seedling parts; levels of chlorophyll pigments (a, b); carotenoids; malondialdehyde; other aldehydes; phenolics (cell wall-linked, free) and proteins were determined. Various statistically significant effects of seed exposure to liquid nitrogen (LN) were recorded. Maize seeds did not seem to be affected by LN exposure either visually or regarding fresh weight or germination rate. However, delayed growth was observed in seedlings recovered from cryopreserved seeds. This trend indicated an increase in the effect of seed cryopreservation on growing plants. The most significant effects of LN exposure were recorded in the combined fresh weight of stems and leaves at day 7 of germination and in fresh weights of roots, stems and leaves at day 14. At the biochemical level, numerous indicators varied following LN exposure, but the most significant effects were recorded in carotenoids, malondialdehyde and other aldehyde contents. LN exposure modified 50.0% of indicators in cotyledons, 48.1% in stems and leaves, 38.8% in roots and 11.1% in seeds. LN storage modified 11.1% of the variables measured at day 0 of germination, 37.0% at day 7, and 52.7% at day 14. Field performance of cryostored seed-derived plants should be evaluated to measure the durability of the changes observed.

Keywords

Biochemical changes Cryopreservation Germplasm preservation Liquid nitrogen Zea mays

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Cuban Ministry for Superior Education. We are grateful to Mrs. Bárbara Valle and Mrs. Julia Martínez for their excellent technical assistance and important experimental suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Human and animal rights

This research did not involve experiments with human or animal participants.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

References

  1. Anjum SA, Wang LC, Farooq M, Hussain M, Xue LL, Zou CM (2011) Brassinolide application improves the drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. J Agron Crop Sci 197:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arguedas M, Perez A, Abdelnour A, Hernandez M, Engelmann F, Martínez ME, Yabor L, Lorenzo JC (2016) Short-term liquid nitrogen storage of maize, common bean and soybean seeds modifies their biochemical composition. Agric Sci 4:6–12Google Scholar
  3. Berjak P, Pammenter NW (2014) Cryostorage of germplasm of tropical recalcitrant-seeded species: approaches and problems. Int J Plant Sci 175:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berjak P, Bartels P, Benson E, Harding K, Mycock D, Pammenter N, Sershen W (2010) Cryoconservation of South African plant genetic diversity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 47:65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berjak P, Varghese B, Pammenter N (2011) Cathodic amelioration of the adverse effects of oxidative stress accompanying procedures necessary for cryopreservation of embryonic axes of recalcitrant-seeded species. Seed Sci Res 21:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cejas I, Vives K, Laudat T, González-Olmedo J, Engelmann F, Martínez-Montero ME, Lorenzo JC (2012) Effects of cryopreservation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. seeds on early stages of germination. Plant Cell Rep 31:2065–2073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cejas I, Méndez R, Villalobos A, Palau F, Aragón C, Engelmann F, Carputo D, Aversano R, Martínez ME, Lorenzo JC (2013) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris plants from non-cryopreserved and cryopreserved seeds. Am J Plant Sci 4:844–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cejas I, Rivas M, Nápoles L, Marrero P, Yabor L, Aragón C, Pérez A, Engelmann F, Martínez-Montero ME, Lorenzo JC (2015) Impact of liquid nitrogen exposure on selected biochemical and structural parameters of hydrated Phaseolus vulgaris L. seeds. CryoLetters 36:149–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cejas I, Rumlow A, Turcios A, Engelmann F, Martínez ME, Yabor L, Papenbrock J, Lorenzo JC (2016) Exposure of common bean seeds to liquid nitrogen modifies mineral composition of young plantlet leaves. Am J Plant Sci 7:1612–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CIMMYT (2016) Maize genetic resources. Available via: CIMMYT. http://cropgenebank.sgrp.cgiar.org/index.php/maize-mainmenu-361. Accessed 20 Oct 2017
  12. Coelho SVB, Rosa SDVF., Fernandes JS (2017) Cryopreservation of coffee seeds: a simplified method. Seed Sci Tech 45:638–649Google Scholar
  13. Engelmann F (2000) Importance of cryopreservation for the conservation of plant genetic resources. In: Engelmann F, Takagi H (eds) Cryopreservation of tropical plant germplasm—current research progress and applications. JIRCAS, Tsukuba, pp 8–20Google Scholar
  14. Engelmann F (2004) Plant cryopreservation: progress and prospects. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 40:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelmann F (2010) Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 47:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engelmann F, Takagi H (2000) Cryopreservation of tropical plant germplasm. In: Engelmann F, Takagi H (eds) Cryopreservation of tropical plant germplasm—current research progress and applications. JIRCAS, Tsukuba, p 496Google Scholar
  17. Fernández-Marín B, Milla R, Martín-Robles N, Arc E, Kranner I, Becerril JM, García-Plazaola JI (2014) Side-effects of domestication: cultivated legume seeds contain similar tocopherols and fatty acids but less carotenoids than their wild counterparts. Plant Biol 14:1599Google Scholar
  18. Forni C, Braglia R, Beninati S, Lentini A, Ronci M, Urbani A, Provenzano B, Frattarelli A, Tabolacci C, Damiano C (2010) Polyamine concentration, transglutaminase activity and changes in protein synthesis during cryopreservation of shoot tips of apple variety Annurca. CryoLetters 31:413–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez-Arnao MT, Martinez-Montero ME, Cruz-Cruz CA, Engelmann F (2014) Advances in cryogenic techniques for the long-term. Preserv Plant Biodivers 4:129–170Google Scholar
  20. Gurr S, McPherson J, Bowles D (1992) Lignin and associated phenolic acids in cell walls. In: Wilkinson DL (ed) Molecular plant pathology. Oxford Press, Oxford, pp 51–56Google Scholar
  21. Haldimann P (1996) Effects of changes in growth temperature on photosynthesis and carotenoid composition in Zea mays leaves. Physiol Plant 97:554–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harding K, Marzalina M, Krishnapillay B, Nashatul Z, Normah M, Benson E (2000) Molecular stability assessments of trees regenerated from cryopreserved Mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King.) seed germplasm using non-radioactive techniques to examine the chromatin structure and DNA methylation status of the ribosomal RNA genes. J Trop For Sci 12:149–163Google Scholar
  23. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weath Clim Ext 10:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heath R, Packer J (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. ISTA (2005) International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association, BassersdorfGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalaiselvi R, Rajasekar M, Gomathi S (2017) Cryopreservation of plant materials-a review. IJCS 5:560–564Google Scholar
  27. Kulus D, Abratowska A (2017) (CRYO) Conservation of Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries shoot tips via encapsulation-dehydration technique. CryoLetters 38:387–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kulus D, Zalewska M (2014) Cryopreservation as a tool used in long-term storage of ornamental species—a review. Sci Hort 168:88–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lakhanpaul S, Babrekar P, Chandel K (1996) Monitoring studies in onion (Allium cepa L.) seeds retrieved from storage at − 20°C and − 180 °C. CryoLetters 17:219–232Google Scholar
  30. Leymarie J, Vitkauskaite G, Hoang H, Gendreau E, Chazoule V, Meimoun P, Corbineau F, Hayat E, Bailly C (2012) Role of reactive oxygen species in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol 53:96–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Meth Enzymol 148:350–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lorenzo JC, Yabor L, Medina N, Quintana N, Wells V (2015) Coefficient of variation can identify the most important effects of experimental treatments. Not Bot Horti Agrobo Cluj-Napoca 43:287–291.  https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4319881 Google Scholar
  33. Martínez-Montero ME, Mora N, Quiñones J, González-Arnao MT, Engelmann F, Lorenzo JC (2002) Effect of cryopreservation on the structural and functional integrity of cell membranes of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) embryogenic calluses. Cryoletters 23:237–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsumoto T (2017) Cryopreservation of plant genetic resources: conventional and new methods. Rev Agri Sci 5:13–20Google Scholar
  35. Mikuła A, Makowski D, Walters C, Rybczyński JJ (2010) Exploration of cryo-methods to preserve tree and herbaceous fern gametophytes. In: Kumar A, Fernández H, Revilla MA (eds) Working with ferns: issues and applications. Springer, New York, pp 173–192Google Scholar
  36. Mira S, Estrelles E, González-Benito ME, Bekker R (2015) Effect of water content and temperature on seed longevity of seven Brassicaceae species after 5 years of storage. Plant Biol 17:153–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nguyen HT, Leipner J, Stamp P, Guerra-Peraza O (2009) Low temperature stress in maize (Zea mays L.) induces genes involved in photosynthesis and signal transduction as studied by suppression subtractive hybridization. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:116–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pérez-Rodríguez JL, Escriba RCR, González GYL, Olmedo JLG, Martínez-Montero ME (2017) Effect of desiccation on physiological and biochemical indicators associated with the germination and vigor of cryopreserved seeds of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Sancti Spíritus 96. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 53:440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porra R (2002) The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynth Res 73:149–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Qin F, Kakimoto M, Sakuma Y, Maruyama K, Osakabe Y, Tran LSP, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Regulation and functional analysis of ZmDREB2A in response to drought and heat stresses in Zea mays L. Plant J 50:54–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Salinas-Flores L, Adams S, Wharton D, Downes M, Lim M (2008) Survival of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, oocytes in relation to intracellular ice formation. Cryobiology 56:28–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Salisbury FB, Ross CW (1992) Plant Physiology (In Spanish). Wadsworth Publishing, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh N, Kaur A, Shevkani K (2014) Maize: grain structure, composition, milling, and starch characteristics. In: Chaudhary D, Kumar S, Langyan S (eds) Maize: nutrition dynamics and novel uses. Springer, New Delhi, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  44. Song W, Liu L, Wang J, Wu Z, Zhang H, Tang J, Lin G, Wang Y, Wen X, Li W (2016) Signature motif-guided identification of receptors for peptide hormones essential for root meristem growth. Cell Res 26:674CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanwood P, Bass L (1981) Seed germplasm preservation using liquid nitrogen. Seed Sci Technol 9:423Google Scholar
  46. Sytykiewicz H (2014) Differential expression of superoxide dismutase genes in aphid-stressed maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. PLoS ONE 9:e94847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Tadeo FR, Gómez-Cadenas A (2008) fisiología del estrés. In: Azcón-Bieto J, Talón M (eds) Fundamentos de fisiología vegetal. MCGRAW-HILL, Madrid, pp 577–597Google Scholar
  48. Uragami A, Lucas M, Ralambosoa J, Renard M, Dereuddre J (1993) Cryopreservation of microspore embryos of soilseed rape (Brassica napus) by dehydration in air with or without alginate encapsulation. CryoLetters 14:83–90Google Scholar
  49. Weitbrecht K, Müller K, Leubner-Metzger G (2011) First off the mark: early seed germination. J Exp Bot 62:3289–3309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zevallos B, Cejas I, Rodríguez RC, Yabor L, Aragón C, González J, Engelmann F, Martínez ME, Lorenzo JC (2013a) Biochemical characterization of Ecuadorian wild Solanum lycopersicum Mill. plants produced from non-cryopreserved and cryopreserved seeds. CryoLetters 34:413–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zevallos B, Cejas I, Valle B, Yabor L, Aragón C, Engelmann F, Martínez ME, Lorenzo JC (2013b) Short-term liquid nitrogen storage of wild tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) seeds modifies the levels of phenolics in 7 day-old seedlings. Sci Hort 160:264–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zevallos B, Cejas I, Engelmann F, Carputo D, Aversano R, Scarano M, Yanes E, Martínez-Montero M, Lorenzo JC (2014) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of plants regenerated from non-cryopreserved and cryopreserved wild Solanum lycopersicum Mill. seeds. CryoLetters 35:216–225PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa Arguedas
    • 1
  • Daviel Gómez
    • 1
  • Lázaro Hernández
    • 1
  • Florent Engelmann
    • 2
    • 3
  • Raffaele Garramone
    • 4
  • Inaudis Cejas
    • 1
  • Lourdes Yabor
    • 1
  • Marcos Edel Martínez-Montero
    • 1
  • José Carlos Lorenzo
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Plant Breeding, Centro de BioplantasUniversidad de Ciego de ÁvilaCiego de ÁvilaCuba
  2. 2.DIADE, IRDMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, University of MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  4. 4.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IIPorticiItaly

Personalised recommendations