Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1047–1053 | Cite as

The impact of zearalenone and thidiazuron on indirect plant regeneration of oilseed rape and wheat

  • Jolanta Biesaga-KościelniakEmail author
  • Janusz Kościelniak
  • Anna Janeczko
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test the synergistic activity of zearalenone and thidiazuron with commonly used regulators (6-benzylaminopurine, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) in callus tissue growth and the regeneration processes of winter oilseed rape and winter wheat. Oilseed rape callus was obtained from the upper fragments of seedling hypocotyls. Wheat callus tissue was obtained from immature embryos. Zearalenone, in combination with 6-benzylaminopurine, stimulated the regeneration of oilseed rape and, in combination with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, the regeneration of wheat. An additional application of thidiazuron to these media increased the percentage of shoot regeneration from callus in both species tested. Zearalenone is proposed as a new regulator in in vitro plant cultures for use in protocols of plant regeneration.

Keywords

Brassica napus Callus Growth regulators Hypocotyls Immature embryos Triticum aestivum 

Abbreviations

BAP

6-Benzylaminopurine

2,4-D

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

ZEN

Zearalenone

TDZ

Thidiazuron

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Iwona Żur (Institute of Plant Physiology, PAS, Krakow) for taking a photo of the in vitro culture of oilseed rape.

References

  1. Bahieldin A, Dyer WE, Qu R (2000) Concentration effects of dicamba on shoot regeneration in wheat. Plant Breed 119:437–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesaga-Kościelniak J (1998) Investigation of the possibility of stimulating generative development of plants by exogenous zearalenone. Acta Physiol Plant 20:4–5Google Scholar
  3. Biesaga-Kościelniak J (2001) Zearalenone as a new hypothetical regulator of plant growth and development. Monograph of Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow Poland (in Polish, with English summary, description of tables and figures)Google Scholar
  4. Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Filek M (2010) Occurrence and physiology of zearalenone as a new plant hormone. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews 3: sociology, organic farming, climate changing and soil science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 419–437Google Scholar
  5. Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Marcińska I, Wędzony M, Kościelniak J (2003) Effect of zearalenone treatment in the production of wheat haploids via maize pollination system. Plant Cell Rep 21:1035–1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohorova NE, Pfeiffer WH, Mergoum M, Crossa J, Pacheco M, Estañol P (2001) Regeneration potential of CIMMYT durum wheat and triticale varieties from immature embryos. Plant Breed 120:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borkowska B, Litwińczuk W (1993) Activity of thidiazuron in vitro shoot cultures of Prunus sp and Morus alba. Biol Plant 35:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capelle SC, Mok DWS, Kirchner SC, Mok MC (1983) Effect of thidiazuron on cytokinin autonomy and the metabolism on N6-(isopentenylo[8–14C] adenosine in callus tissues of Phaseolus lunatus L. Plant Physiol 80:449–493Google Scholar
  9. Chuong PV, Pauls KP, Beversdorf WD (1985) A simple culture method for Brassica hypocotyl protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 4:4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Jong AJ, Schmidt DEDL, De Veries SC (1993) Early events in higher-plant embryogenesis. Plant Mol Biol 22:367–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganeshan S, Chodaparambil SV, Båga M, Fowler DB, Hucl P, Rossnagel BG, Chibbar RN (2006) In vitro regeneration of cereals based on multiple shoot induction from mature embryos in response to thidiazuron. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 85:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill R, Saxena PK (1993) Somatic embryogenesis in Nicotiana tabacum L: induction by thidiazuron of direct embryo differentiation from cultured leaf discs. Plant Cell Rep 12:154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gubbuk H, Pekmezci M (2006) In vitro propagation of banana (Musa spp.) using thidiazuron and activated charcoal. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 56:65–69Google Scholar
  14. Hutchinson MJ, Murch SJ, Saxena PK (1996) Morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron: evidence of the involvement of endogenous auxin in thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis of geranium (Pelargonium × hortorum Bailey). J Plant Physiol 149:573–579Google Scholar
  15. Jiang B, Yang YG, Guo YM, Guo ZC, Chen YZ (2005) Thidiazuron-induced in vitro shoot organogenesis of the medicinal plant Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnst. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:677–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones MPA, Yi Z, Murch SJ, Saxena PK (2007) Thidiazuron-induced regeneration of Echinacea purpurea L.: micropropagation in solid and liquid culture systems. Plant Cell Rep 26:13–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Khehra GS, Mathias RJ (1992) The interaction of genotype, explant and media on the regeneration of shoots from complex explants of Brassica napus L. J Exp Bot 43:1413–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khurana J, Chugh A, Khurana P (2002) Regeneration from mature and immature embryos and transient gene expression via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum Schuble). Ind J Exp Biol 40:1295–1303Google Scholar
  19. Klang DT, Kennedy BJ, Pathre SV, Mirocha CJ (1978) Binding characteristics of zearalenone analogies to estrogen receptors. Cancer Res 38:3611–3616Google Scholar
  20. Lazzeri PA, Dunwell JM (1984) In vitro shoot regeneration from seedling root segments of Brassica oleracea and Brassica napus cultivars. Ann Bot 54:341–350Google Scholar
  21. Maheshwari N, Rajyalakshmi K, Baweja K, Dhir SK, Chowdhry CN, Maheshwari SC (1995) In vitro culture of wheat and genetic transformation—retrospect and prospect. Plant Sci 14:49–178Google Scholar
  22. Marcińska I (2003) Wheat cell suspension culture. Monograph of Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow Poland (in Polish, with English summary, description of tables and figures)Google Scholar
  23. Marcińska I, Szechyńska M, Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Filek M (2001) Applicability of Polish winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to long-term in vitro culture. Cereal Res Commun 29:127–134Google Scholar
  24. Meng FJ, Han Y, Que Y, Wang H (1992) Zearalenone, a key substance controlling plant development. In: Karssen CM, Loon LCV, Vreugdenhil D (eds) Progress in plant growth regulation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  25. Michalczuk L, Cook TJ, Cohen JD (1992) Auxin levels at different stages of carrot somatic embryogenesis. Phytochemistry 31:1097–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muller R, Baier M, Kaiser WM (1991) Differential stimulation of PEP-carboxylation in guard cells and mesophyll cells by ammonium or fusicoccin. J Exp Bot 42:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mundhara R, Rashid A (2002) Stimulation of shoot-bud regeneration on hypocotyl of Linum seedlings, on a transient withdrawal of calcium: effect of calcium, cytokinin and thidiazuron. Plant Sci 162:211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newberne PM (1987) Interaction of nutrients and other factors with mycotoxins. In: Krough P (ed) Mycotoxin in food. Academic Press, London, p 177Google Scholar
  30. Podwyszyńska M, Marasek A (2003) Effect of thidiazuron and pactlobutrazol on regeneration potential of tulip flower stalk explants in vitro and subsequent shoot multiplication. Acta Soc Bot Pol 72:181–190Google Scholar
  31. Przetakiewicz A, Orczyk W, Nadolska-Orczyk A (2003) The effect of auxin on plant regeneration of wheat, barley and triticale. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 73:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shan X, Li D, Qu R (2000) Thidiazuron promotes in vitro regeneration of wheat and barley. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharma VK, Hänsch R, Mendel RR, Schulze J (2005) Influence of picloram and thidiazuron on high frequency plant regeneration in elite cultivars of wheat with long-term retention of morphogenecity using meristematic shoot segments. Plant Breed 124:242–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Szechyńska-Hebda M, Skrzypek E, Dąbrowska G, Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Filek M, Wędzony M (2007) The role of oxidative stress induced by growth regulators in the regeneration process of wheat. Acta Physiol Plant 29:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas TD, Puthur JT (2004) Thidiazuron induced high frequency shoot organogenesis in callus from Kigelia pinnata L. Bot Bull Acad Sin 45:307–313Google Scholar
  36. Visser C, Qureshi JA, Gill R, Saxena PK (1992) Morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron: substitution of auxin and cytokinin requirement for the induction of somatic embryogenesis in geranium hypocotyl cultures. Plant Physiol 99:1704–1707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang JX, Zhao FY, Xu P (2006) Use of aroA-M1 as a selectable marker for Brassica napus transformation. Crop Sci 46:706–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang GQ, Zhou WJ, Gu HH, Song WJ, Momoh EJJ (2003) Plant regeneration from the hybridization of Brassica juncea and B. napus through embryo culture. J Agron Crop Sci 189:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Żur I, Kościelniak J, Dubert F (2002) Metabolic activity as a possible indicator of morphogenic potential in rape callus cultures—the effect of exogenous spermidine. Zesz Probl Post Nauk Roln 481:357–367 (in Polish, with English abstract, description of tables and figures)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jolanta Biesaga-Kościelniak
    • 1
    Email author
  • Janusz Kościelniak
    • 2
  • Anna Janeczko
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant PhysiologyPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of AgricultureKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations