Quoi de neuf en proctologie depuis la fin du dernier millénaire ?

What’s new in proctology since year 2K?

Résumé

La chirurgie anale a bénéficié d’avancées depuis le début du troisième millénaire avec le développement de traitement mini invasifs et de la chirurgie ambulatoire.

Abstract

Anal surgery has progressed since the beginning of the third millennium with the development of mini -invasive treatment and outpatient surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Références

  1. 1.

    Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th world congress of endoscopic surgery; June 3-6 Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S. (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial [see comments]. Lancet 355:782–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, et al (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005393

  7. 7.

    Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Milito G, Cadeddu F, Muzi MG, et al (2010) Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 12:85–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. (2010) Pain after conventional versus Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis. Intern J Surg 8:269–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ, Tong DN. (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG 19:4799–807

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee KC, Chen HH, Chung KC, et al (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes for stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids in adults. Intern J Surg 11:914–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T. (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L. (2004) Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:176–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Theodoropoulos GE, Sevrisarianos N, Papaconstantinou J, et al (2010) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation, rectoanal repair, sutured haemorrhoidopexy and minimal mucocutaneous excision for grades III-IV haemorrhoids: a multicenter prospective study of safety and efficacy. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 12:125–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C. (2014) A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 57:348–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Denoya P, Tam J, Bergamaschi R. (2014) Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year followup assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Techn Coloproctol 18:1081–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Elmer SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE. (2013) A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lucarelli P, Picchio M, Caporossi M, et al (2013) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-term follow-up. Ann Royal College Surg Engl 95:246–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, et al (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 14:205–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schuurman JP, Borel Rinkes IH, Go PM. (2012) Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 255:840–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Khubchandani IT, Reed JF. (1989) Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 76:431–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lund JN, Scholefield JH. (1997) A randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate ointment in treatment of anal fissure. Lancet 349:11–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hyman NH, Cataldo PA. (1999) Nitroglycerin ointment for anal fissures: effective treatment or just a headache? Dis Colon Rectum 42:383–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Antropoli C, Perrotti P, Rubino M, et al (1999) Nifedipine for local use in conservative treatment of anal fissures: preliminary results of a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1011–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Maria G, Cassetta E, Gui D, et al (1998) A comparison of botulinum toxin and saline for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med 338:217–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Colak T, Ipek T, Kanik A, Aydin S. (2002) A randomized trial of botulinum toxin vs lidocain pomade for chronic anal fissure. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 65:187–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Siproudhis L, Sebille V, Pigot F, et al (2003) Lack of effficacy of botulinum toxin in chronic anal fissure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:515–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nelson RL, Thomas K, Morgan J, Jones A. (2012) Non surgical therapy for anal fissure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD003431.

  32. 32.

    Abramowitz L, Bouchard D, Souffran M, et al (2013) Sphinctersparing anal-fissure surgery: a 1-year prospective, observational, multicentre study of fissurectomy with anoplasty. Colorectal Dis 15:359–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, et al (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    van Koperen PJ, Bemelman WA, Gerhards MF, et al (2011) The anal fistula plug treatment compared with the mucosal advancement flap for cryptoglandular high transsphincteric perianal fistula: a double-blinded multicenter randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:387–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schouten WR, van Vroonhoven TJ. (1991) Treatment of anorectal abscess with or without primary fistulectomy. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 34:60–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Jacob TJ, Perakath B, Keighley MR. (2010) Surgical intervention for anorectal fistula. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 5:CD006319.

  37. 37.

    O’Connor L, Champagne BJ, Ferguson MA, et al (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn’s anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1569–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    O’Riordan JM, Datta I, Johnston C, Baxter NN. (2012) A systematic review of the anal fistula plug for patients with Crohn’s and non-Crohn’s related fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 55:351–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Alasari S, Kim NK. (2014) Overview of anal fistula and systematic review of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT). Tech Coloproctol 18:13–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Madbouly KM, El Shazly W, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. (2014) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract versus mucosal advancement flap in patients with high transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1202–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Prosst RL, Joos AK, Ehni W, et al (2015) Prospective pilot study of anorectal fistula closure with the OTSC Proctology. Colorectal Dis 17:81–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M. (2014) Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser—FiLaC: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis 16:110–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kimball AB, Kerdel F, Adams D, et al (2012) Adalimumab for the treatment of moderate to severe Hidradenitis suppurativa: a parallel randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 157:846–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Grant A, Gonzalez T, Montgomery MO, et al (2010) Infliximab therapy for patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 62:205–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Miller I, Lynggaard CD, Lophaven S, et al (2011) A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of adalimumab in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 165:391–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Senéjoux.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Senéjoux, A. Quoi de neuf en proctologie depuis la fin du dernier millénaire ?. Colon Rectum 9, 36–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-015-0568-4

Download citation

Mots clés

  • Hémorroïdes
  • Fissure anale
  • Fistule anale
  • Maladie de Verneuil

Keywords

  • Hemorrhoids
  • Anal fissure
  • Anal fistula
  • Hidrosadenitis