Skip to main content
Log in

En 2013, faut-il préférer la défécographie standard ou l’IRM-dynamique dans le bilan des troubles de la statique pelvienne ?

  • Controverse / Debate
  • Published:
Côlon & Rectum

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9(3):247–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, et al (2011) Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(9):1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maglinte DT, Hale DS, Sandrasegaran K (2012) Comparison between dynamic cystocolpoproctography and dynamic pelvic floor MRI: pros and cons: which is the “functional” examination for anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction? Abdom Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9870-x

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218(3):621–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ (2011) Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W394–W399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS, Benson JT (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(1):81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner DJ, Hricak H (2010) Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA 304(2):208–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Einstein AJ (2011) Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging. Radiology 261(1):193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, et al (1998) Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 206(3):641–646

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, et al (2001) Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(3):633–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD, et al (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(1):31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Références

  1. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, et al (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bove A, Pucciani F, Bellini M, et al (2012) Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR: diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: diagnosis). World J Gastroenterol 18:1555–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfeifer J, Oliveira L, Park UC, et al (1997) Are interpretations of video defecographies reliable and reproducible? Intern J Colorectal Dis 12:67–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karling P, Abrahamsson H, Dolk A, et al (2009) Function and dysfunction of the colon and anorectum in adults: working team report of the Swedish Motility Group (SMoG). Scand J Gastroenterol 44:646–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finco C, Savastano S, Luongo B, et al (2008) Colpocystodefecography in obstructed defecation: is it really useful to the surgeon? Correlating clinical and radiological findings in surgery for obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 10:446–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kester RR, Leboeuf L, Amendola MA, et al (2003) Value of express T2-weighted pelvic MRI in the preoperative evaluation of severe pelvic floor prolapse: a prospective study. Urology 61:1135–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eguare EI, Neary P, Crosbie J, et al (2004) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with idiopathic combined fecal and urinary incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 8:73–82; discussion 82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morren GL, Balasingam AG, Wells JE, et al (2005) Triphasic MRI of pelvic organ descent: sources of measurement error. Eur J Radiol 54:276–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodroff MA, Stolpen AH, Denson MA, et al (2002) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: the relationship with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse quantification staging system. J Urol 167:1353–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hidar S, Khairi H (2005) Influence of spontaneous and instrumental vaginal delivery on objective measures of pelvic organ support: assessment with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) technique and functional cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120:230; author reply 230–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. Meurette or L. Siproudhis.

About this article

Cite this article

Meurette, G., Frampas, E. & Siproudhis, L. En 2013, faut-il préférer la défécographie standard ou l’IRM-dynamique dans le bilan des troubles de la statique pelvienne ?. Colon Rectum 7, 110–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-013-0452-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-013-0452-z

Navigation