Références
Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9(3):247–251
Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, et al (2011) Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(9):1191–1196
Maglinte DT, Hale DS, Sandrasegaran K (2012) Comparison between dynamic cystocolpoproctography and dynamic pelvic floor MRI: pros and cons: which is the “functional” examination for anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction? Abdom Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9870-x
Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218(3):621–641
Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ (2011) Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W394–W399
Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS, Benson JT (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(1):81–88
Brenner DJ, Hricak H (2010) Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA 304(2):208–209
Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Einstein AJ (2011) Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging. Radiology 261(1):193–198
Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508
Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, et al (1998) Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 206(3):641–646
Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, et al (2001) Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(3):633–636
Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD, et al (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(1):31–37
Références
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, et al (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749
Bove A, Pucciani F, Bellini M, et al (2012) Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR: diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: diagnosis). World J Gastroenterol 18:1555–1564
Pfeifer J, Oliveira L, Park UC, et al (1997) Are interpretations of video defecographies reliable and reproducible? Intern J Colorectal Dis 12:67–72
Karling P, Abrahamsson H, Dolk A, et al (2009) Function and dysfunction of the colon and anorectum in adults: working team report of the Swedish Motility Group (SMoG). Scand J Gastroenterol 44:646–660
Finco C, Savastano S, Luongo B, et al (2008) Colpocystodefecography in obstructed defecation: is it really useful to the surgeon? Correlating clinical and radiological findings in surgery for obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 10:446–452
Kester RR, Leboeuf L, Amendola MA, et al (2003) Value of express T2-weighted pelvic MRI in the preoperative evaluation of severe pelvic floor prolapse: a prospective study. Urology 61:1135–1139
Eguare EI, Neary P, Crosbie J, et al (2004) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with idiopathic combined fecal and urinary incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 8:73–82; discussion 82
Morren GL, Balasingam AG, Wells JE, et al (2005) Triphasic MRI of pelvic organ descent: sources of measurement error. Eur J Radiol 54:276–283
Hodroff MA, Stolpen AH, Denson MA, et al (2002) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: the relationship with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse quantification staging system. J Urol 167:1353–1355
Hidar S, Khairi H (2005) Influence of spontaneous and instrumental vaginal delivery on objective measures of pelvic organ support: assessment with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) technique and functional cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120:230; author reply 230–1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
About this article
Cite this article
Meurette, G., Frampas, E. & Siproudhis, L. En 2013, faut-il préférer la défécographie standard ou l’IRM-dynamique dans le bilan des troubles de la statique pelvienne ?. Colon Rectum 7, 110–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-013-0452-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-013-0452-z