Évaluer l’efficacité et la satisfaction d’une intervention interdisciplinaire brève chez des patients souffrant de douleur chronique

Assessing the Effectiveness and Satisfaction of a brief interdisciplinary program for chronic pain patients

Résumé

Cette étude évalue les effets d’un programme interdisciplinaire et éducatif auprès de 88 participants souffrant de douleur chronique. L’intervention est associée à une réduction significative de l’incapacité reliée à la douleur, des symptômes anxieux et dépressifs et de la dramatisation de la douleur avec des tailles d’effet, de faibles à modérées, selon les variables. De plus, les participants se disent majoritairement satisfaits du programme. Cette étude montre qu’un programme d’intervention bref et interdisciplinaire peut s’avérer efficace et satisfaisant pour les personnes souffrant de douleur chronique en milieu hospitalier.

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary and psychoeducative program on 88 chronic pain patients. The program has been associated with a significant reduction in pain-related disability, anxiety and depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing with effect sizes ranging from small to moderate. Furthermore, participants were mostly satisfied with the program. The study showed that a brief and interdisciplinary approach seems effective by reducing pain-related symptoms in patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Références

  1. 1.

    Choiniere M, Dion D, Peng P, et al (2010) The Canadian STOPPAIN project–Part 1: Who are the patients on the waitlists of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities? Can J Anaesth 57:539–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke, K (2003) Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med 163:2433–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kroenke K, Outcalt S, Krebs E, et al (2013) Association between anxiety, health-related quality of life and functional impairment in primary care patients with chronic pain. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 35:359–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, et al (2009) Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine 34:1066–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, McGeary CA, Lippe B (2014) Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future. Am Psychol 69:119–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Luk KD, Wan TW, Wong YW, et al (2010) A multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:131–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pincus T, McCracken LM (2013) Psychological factors and treatment opportunities in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 27:625–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S (2012) Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD007407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A-Tjak JGG, Davis ML, Morina N, et al (2015) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychother Psychosom 84:30–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Becker S (2014) The effects of acceptance- and mindfulnessbased interventions on chronic pain: A systematic review. University of Twente

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice (2006) Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am Psychol 61:271–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Veehof MM, Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, Schreurs KMG (2016) Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther 45:5–31

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Deccache A, Doumont D, Berrewaerts J, Deccache C (2011) Éducation du patient et douleur chronique: une approche sociopsychoéducative comme complément des stratégies multidisciplinaires de soins. Doul Analg 24:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Knoerl R, Lavoie Smith EM, Weisberg J (2015) Chronic pain and cognitive behavioral therapy: an integrative review. West J Nurs Res 38:596–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gatchel RJ, Okifuji A (2006) Evidence-based scientific data documenting the treatment and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 7:779–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sturgeon JA (2014) Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain. Psychol Res Behav Manag 7:115–24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al (2008) Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9:105–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cleeland CS, Ryan KM (1994) Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 23:129–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–70

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Friedman S, Samelian JC, Lancreno S, Even C (2001) Threedimensional structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a large French primary care population suffering from major depression. Psychiatry Res 104:247–57

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J (1995) The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess 7:524–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    French DJ, Noël M, Vigneau F, et al (2005) L’échelle de dramatisation face à la douleur PCS-CF: adaptation canadienne en langue française de l’échelle. Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Rev Can Sci Comportement 37:181–92

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Van Damme S, Crombez G, Vlaeyen J, et al (2000) De pain catastrophizing scale: psychometrische karakteristieken en normering. Gedragstherapie 33:209–20

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schopflocher D, Taenzer P, Jovey R (2011) The prevalence of chronic pain in Canada. Res Manag 16:445–50

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Luciano JV, Guallar JA, Aguado J, et al (2014) Effectiveness of group acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia: a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EFFIGACT study). Pain 155:693–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dysvik E, Kvaloy J, Stokkeland R, Natvig G (2010) The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain management programme managing chronic pain on pain perceptions, health-related quality of life and stages of change — a non-randomized controlled study. Int J Nurs Stud 47:826–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bourgault P, Lacasse A, Marchand S, et al (2015) Multicomponent Interdisciplinary Group Intervention for Self-Management of Fibromyalgia: a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 10:e0126324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vowles KE, Witkiewitz K, Sowden G, Ashworth J (2014) Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: evidence of mediation and clinically significant change following an abbreviated interdisciplinary program of rehabilitation. J Pain 15:101–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mead K, Theadom A, Byron K, Dupont S (2007) Pilot study of a 4-week pain coping strategies (PCS) programme for the chronic pain patient. Disabil Rehabil 29:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Keogh E, McCracken LM, Eccleston C (2005) Do men and women differ in their response to interdisciplinary chronic pain management? Pain 114:37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dworkin RH, Jensen MP, Gould E, et al (2011) Treatment satisfaction in osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: the role of pain, physical and emotional functioning, sleep, and adverse events. J Pain 12:416–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    McCracken LM, Evon D, Karapas ET (2002) Satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain in a specialty service: preliminary prospective results. Eur J Pain 6:387–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Verbeek J, Sengers M, Riemens L, Haafkens J (2004) Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies patient. Spine J 29:2309–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fink-Miller EL, Long DM, Gross RT (2014) Comparing chronic pain treatment seekers in primary care versus tertiary care settings. J Am Board Fam Med 27:594–601

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pichette-Leclerc.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pichette-Leclerc, S., Dionne, F. & Pinard, AM. Évaluer l’efficacité et la satisfaction d’une intervention interdisciplinaire brève chez des patients souffrant de douleur chronique. Douleur analg 30, 250–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11724-017-0529-9

Download citation

Mots clés

  • Douleur chronique
  • Thérapie cognitive et comportementale (TCC)
  • Thérapie d’acceptation et d’engagement (ACT)
  • Psychoéducation
  • Interdisciplinarité

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
  • Psychoeducation
  • Interdisciplinarity