Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation des syndromes dépressifs dans un cadre médico-juridique : empathie et objectivité

Depressive disorders assessment in a medico-legal context: empathy and objectivity

  • Article Original / Original Article
  • Published:
Douleur et Analgésie

Résumé

L’évaluation des états dépressifs dans un cadre médico-juridique se heurte à une contrainte née de l’affrontement de deux logiques: l’une probabiliste, l’autre normative. A cette difficulté s’ajoute celle due à la nature essentiellement subjective de ces troubles. Comment, dès lors, en donner une représentation « objective » et une appréciation quantifiée ? L’adoption d’une démarche rigoureuse, respectueuse de la complexité clinique et de la diversité évolutive des syndromes dépressifs, en est une condition nécessaire. Après avoir passé en revue les principales formes cliniques des syndromes dépressifs, souligné certaines difficultés diagnostiques et rappelé les limites de l’emploi des instruments psychométriques, l’auteur amorce une réflexion sur les relations entre empathie et objectivité, à la lumière de travaux récents en neurosciences sociales.

Abstract

The assessment of depressive disorders in a medico-legal context has to deal with conflicting logics, the probabilistic nature of medical thinking confronting the normative construct of legal concepts. Depressive symptoms being essentially subjective, an objective and quantitative account of these disorders requires to give careful attention to their clinical complexity and outcome diversity. Having shortly reviewed the main clinical presentations of depressive disorders and highlighted some diagnostic difficulties as well as the limits of the psychometric instruments, the author opens a reflection on the relationships between empathy and objectivity in the light of recent research in social neurosciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Angst J, Cassano G (2005) The mood spectrum: improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 7(suppl. 4):4–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Avenanti A et al. (2009) The pain as a model in the personality of an onlooker: Influence of state-reactivity and personality traits on embodied empathy for pain. Neuroimage, 44:275–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagby RM et al. (2004) The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the Gold Standard Become a Lead Weight ? Am J Psychiatry, 161:2163–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck AT et al. (1988) Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five Years of Evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benazzi F, Akiskal H (2005) Irritable-hostile depression: further validation as a bipolar depressive mixed state. J Affect Disord, 84:197–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowden C. (2005) A different depression: clinical distinctions between bipolar and unipolar depression. J Affect Disord, 84:117–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown GW et al. (2008) Parental maltreatment and adulthood cohabiting partnerships: A life-course study of adult chronic depression 4. J Affect Disord, 110:115–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallese V. (2003) The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36:171–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halbreich U et al. (2007) Culturally-sensitive complaints of depressions and anxieties in women. J Affect Disord, 102:159–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 23:56–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris CA, D’Eon JL. (2008) Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) in individuals with chronic pain. Pain, 137:609–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hein G and Singer T. (2008) I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18:153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perlis RH et al. (2006) Clinical Features of Bipolar Depression Versus Major Depressive Disorder in Large Multicenter Trials. Am J Psychiatry, 163:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Poole H et al. (2009) The utility of the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDI-FS) in a pain clinic population. European Journal of Pain, 13:865–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Riso LP et al. (2002) The search for determinants of chronic depression: a review of six factors. J Affect Disord, 70:103–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rytsälä HJ et al. (2007) Predictors of long-term work disability in Major Depressive Disorder: a prospective study. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 115:206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiersma JE et al. (2009) The Importance of Childhood Trauma and Childhood Life Events for Chronicity of Depression in Adults. J Clin Psychiatry, 70(7):983–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Baud, P. Evaluation des syndromes dépressifs dans un cadre médico-juridique : empathie et objectivité. Douleur analg 22 (Suppl 1), 19–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11724-009-0170-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11724-009-0170-3

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation