Abstract
The philosophy of Confucius has often been accused of lacking classical definitions of its core concepts. However, as I shall argue, Confucius systematically used nonclassical definitions—to be precise, operational ones. The notion of operational definition comes from Percy Bridgman’s The Logic of Modern Physics (Bridgman 1927) and means that the definiendum is defined by a set of operations that results in determining the meaning of the term in question. In the case of Confucian argumentation, operational definitions are mostly nominal and, in contrast to unambiguous methods of measurement, also context-dependent. This results in there being various yet not mutually inconsistent definitions of one term, and in “paradigmatic examples” playing a crucial role. As I show, this mode of defining things had major implications for the content of Confucius’ thought. In fact, many of its forms could be traced back to other Chinese philosophers, including those of non-Confucian provenance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bridgman, Percy W. 1927. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: The Macmillan Company.
______. 1938. “Operational Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 5: 114–131.
______. 1949. “The Operational Aspect of Meaning.” Synthese 8.1: 251–259.
Cargile, James. 1991. “Real and Nominal Definitions.” In Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by James H. Fetzer, David Shatz, and George N. Schlesinger. Synthese Library vol. 216. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chen, Ning. 1997. “Confucius’ View of Fate (Ming).” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24.3: 323–359.
Chuanxilu 傳習錄. 1992. In Complete Works of Wang Yangming 王陽明全集, vol. 1, edited by Wu Guang 吳光, Qian Ming 錢明, Dong Ping 董平, Yao Yanfu 姚延福. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
Cua, Antonio S. 1969. “The Logic of Confucian Dialogues.” In Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. 4, edited by John Ryan. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
Delaney, William. 1998. “Limitation of Operational Definitions.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38.6: 1757–1762.
Dewey, John. 1910. The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Ennis, Robert H. 1964. “Operational Definitions.” American Educational Research Journal 1.3: 183–201.
Hartwell, Robert. 1971. “Historical Analogism, Public Policy, and Social Science in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century China.” The American Historical Review 76.3: 690–727.
Lippiello, Tiziana. 2010. “A Confucian Adage for Life: Empathy (Shu) in the Analects.” In Light a Candle: Encounters and Friendship with China. Festschrift in Honour of Angelo Lazzarotto P.I.M.E., edited by Roman Malek S.V.D. and Gianni Criveller. Sankt Augustin: Monumenta Serica.
Lucas, Thierry. 2020. “Definitions in Pre-Qin Texts.” In Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic, edited by Fung Yiu-ming. Cham: Springer.
Lunyu 論語. 1999. In Commentaries and Explanations to the Thirteen Classics 十三經註疏, vol. 10, edited by Li Xueqin 李學勤. Beijing 北京: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe 北京大學出版社.
Mengzi 孟子. 1999. In Commentaries and Explanations to the Thirteen Classics 十三經註疏, vol. 11, edited by Li Xueqin 李學勤. Beijing 北京: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe北京大學出版社.
Mozi Jiangu 墨子閒詁. 2009. Edited by Sun Yirang 孫詒讓. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Nakamura, Hajime. 1964. Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India-China-Tibet-Japan. Honolulu: The University of Hawai’i Press.
Olberding, Amy. 2012. Moral Exemplars in the Analects: The Good Person Is That. New York: Routledge.
Rogacz, Dawid. 2017. “The Motif of Legendary Emperors Yao and Shun in Ancient Chinese Literature.” In Rethinking Orient: In Search of Sources and Inspirations, edited by Adam Bednarczyk, Magdalena Kubarek, and Maciej Szatkowski. Warsaw: Peter Lang.
______. 2018. “Spring and Autumn Annals as Narrative Explanation”. In Towards a Revival of Analytical Philosophy of History: Around Paul A. Roth’s Vision of Historical Sciences, edited by Krzysztof Brzechczyn. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Slife, Brent D., Casey D. Wright, and Stephen C. Yanchar. 2016. “Using Operational Definitions in Research: A Best-Practice Approach.” The Journal of Mind and Behavior 37.2: 119–140.
Slingerland, Ted. 1996. “The Conception of Ming in Early Confucian Thought.” Philosophy East and West 46.4: 567–581.
Stevens, S. S. 1935. “The Operational Definition of Psychological Concepts.” Psychological Review 42.6: 517–527.
Tan, Sor-hoon. 2010. “Authoritative Master Kong (Confucius) in an Authoritarian Age.” Dao 9.2: 137–149.
______. 2013. “Moral Exemplars in the Analects: The Good Person Is That. New York: Routledge, 2012, x+232 pages.” Dao 12.2: 261–265.
Xiao, Yang. 2007. “How Confucius Does Things with Words: Two Hermeneutic Paradigms in the Analects and Its Exegeses.” The Journal of Asian Studies 66.2: 497–532.
Xunzi Jijie 荀子集解. 1988. Edited by Wang Xianqian 王先謙. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Weber, Max. 1951. The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. Trans. by Hans Gerth. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe. 3rd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zhuangzi Jishi 莊子集釋. 1961. Edited by Guo Qingfan 郭慶藩. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) in Poland, grant no. 2019/33/B/HS1/00244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rogacz, D. Operating with Names: Operational Definitions in the Analects and Beyond. Dao 21, 19–35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-021-09813-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-021-09813-9