Reason and Moral Motivation in Mòzǐ

Abstract

Based on the observation that ancient Chinese thinkers formulated their conception of logic and agency mainly around the concept of biàn 辯 (discrimination), Chris Fraser argues that (1) ancient Chinese thinkers had no concept of sentence or proposition, (2) they did not engage in logical argumentation in its proper sense, and (3) reason or rationality was not highly valued in ancient China for normative evaluation of actions. However, the text of the Mòzǐ 墨子 contains strong pieces of evidence against these claims, and I argue that the opposite is clearly the case in Mòzǐ. Then, I move on to apply the metaethical idea of judgment internalism—the idea that there is an “internal” or conceptual connection between moral judgment and motivation—to some passages from the Mòzǐ and argue that Mòzǐ is best interpreted as a flexible internalist who is willing to incorporate an externalist idea into his system of thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Fraser, Chris. 2009. “Action and Agency in Early Chinese Thought.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture 5: 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ______. 2011. “Mohism and Motivation.” In Ethics in Early China: An Anthology, edited by Chris Fraser, Dan Robins, and Timothy O’Leary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  3. ______. 2012. “Truth in Moist Dialectics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39: 351–368.

  4. ______. 2013. “Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought.” History and Philosophy of Logic 34.1: 1–24.

  5. Hansen, Chad. 1985. “Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and ‘Truth.’” Journal of Asian Studies 44.3: 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1998. Science and Civilization in China, Volume 7, Part 1: Language and Logic. Edited by Kenneth Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1998. “Mohist philosophy.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 6, edited by E. Craig. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston, Ian. 2010. The Mozi: A Complete Translation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knoblock, John, and Jeffrey Riegel. 2013. Mozi: A Study and Translation of the Ethical and Political Writings. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loy, Hui-chieh. 2015. “Mohist Arguments on War.” In Chinese Just War Ethics: Origin, Development, and Dissent, edited by Ping-Cheung Lo and Sumner B. Twiss. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mei, Yi-pao. 1929. The Ethical and Political Works of Motse. London: Arthur Probsthain.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2003. Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Slingerland, Edward. 2011. “‘Of What Use Are the Odes?’ Cognitive Science, Virtue Ethics, and Early Confucian Ethics.” Philosophy East and West 61.1: 80–109.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sūn, Yíràng 孫詒讓. 2001. Commentaries on the Mozi 墨子閒詁. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjú 中華書局.

  16. Van Norden, Bryan W. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong, David. 2003. “Mohism: The Founder, Mozi (Mo Tzu).” In Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy, edited by Antonio S. Cua. New York: Routledge.

  18. Yáng, Bójùn 楊伯峻. 1960. Translation and Interpretation of the Mengzi 孟子譯注. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjú 中華書局.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Philip J. Ivanhoe, Brian Bruya, Chaehyun Chong, Youngsun Back, Hui-chieh Loy, and the anonymous reviewers of this essay for their helpful comments, suggestions, and references. I would also like to express my gratitude to the Advanced Institute for Confucian Studies at Shandong University in China for providing me with generous financial and administrative support and a wonderful environment that enabled me to work on and finish this essay as a visiting scholar there from May to August, 2019.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myeong-seok Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Ms. Reason and Moral Motivation in Mòzǐ. Dao 20, 179–205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-021-09772-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mòzǐ 墨子
  • Reason
  • Logic
  • Moral motivation
  • Judgment internalism