Abstract
In a recent conference volume, American philosopher Michael Sandel engages the Confucian tradition in the search for alternatives to what Sandel calls the “unencumbered self,” the unattached liberal subject as detailed in the philosophy of John Rawls. Responding to Sandel, American Confucianist Roger Ames draws on a lifetime of comparative thought to advance the Pragmatism of John Dewey as a way to interrogate Western philosophy in general, arguing that “humane becomings,” a view of the human person facilitated, Ames writes, by Deweyan Pragmatism, are the Confucian ideal and the key to recovering a holistic anthropology within the Western tradition. In this essay, I intervene in the Ames-Sandel debate to argue that Charles Peirce, and not John Dewey, is the best American Pragmatist for bridging the divide between the Confucian and Rawlsian views of the human person. Peirce’s emphasis on love as true intersubjectivity and on communication as the exchange of real meaning is, I argue, the key to unlocking the Confucian ideal to the West.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger T. 2006. “Foreword.” In Joseph Grange, John Dewey, Confucius, and Global Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
______. 2011. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press; Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
______. 2018. “Theorizing the ‘Person’ in Confucian Ethics.” In Encountering China: Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy, edited by Michael J. Sandel and Paul J. D’Ambrosio. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. 1999. The Democracy of the Dead: Dewey, Confucius, and the Hope for Democracy in China. Chicago and Lasalle: Open Court.
Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont, Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Barfield, Owen. 1949. “Goethe and Evolution.” The Listener 42 (December 1): 945-946.
Bergson, Henri. 1946. The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. by Mabelle L. Andison. New York: Windsor Library.
Boldeman, Lee. 2007. The Cult of the Market: Economic Fundamentalism and Its Discontents. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
Burch, Robert. 2018. “Charles Sanders Peirce.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/peirce/ (last accessed on July 13, 2020).
Carroll, William E. 2016. “Thomas Aquinas on Creation and Science: An Invitation for China, and Not Only for China.” Modern Age 58.4: 41–49.
Colapietro, Vincent. 1989. Peirce’s Approach to the Self. Albany: State University of New York Press.
D’Ambrosio, Paul J. 2018. “A Sandelian Response to Confucian Role Ethics.” In Encountering China: Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy, edited by Michael J. Sandel and Paul J. D’Ambrosio. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Deely, John N. 1971. The Tradition via Heidegger: An Essay on the Meaning of Being in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
______. 2000. The Red Book: The Beginning of Postmodern Times, Or: Charles Sanders Peirce and the Recovery of Signum. Helsinki: The Metaphysical Club of the University of Helsinki.
Desmond, John F. 2004. Walker Percy’s Search for Community. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Fröhlich, Thomas. 2017. Tang Junyi: Confucian Philosophy and the Challenge of Modernity. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Gallie, W. B. 1952. Peirce and Pragmatism. Hammondsworth and Middlesex: Penguin.
Gordon, David. 2006. “Michael Sandel’s Case for Statism.” Mises Daily Articles, January 17. https://mises.org/es/library/michael-sandels-case-statism (last accessed on July 7, 2020).
Graham, Angus C. 1991. “Replies.” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by Henry Rosemont Jr., 267–323. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hauerwas, Stanley. 1973. “The Self as Story: Religion and Morality from the Agent’s Perspective.” The Journal of Religious Ethics, 1: 73–85.
Helle, Horst J. 2017. China: Promise or Threat?: A Comparison of Cultures. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Kaag, John. 2016. American Philosophy: A Love Story. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Lawson, Lewis A., and Victor Kramer, eds. 1985. Walker Percy, Conversations with Walker Percy. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
McGrath, Larry. 2013. “Bergson Comes to America.” Journal of the History of Ideas 74.4: 599–620.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992a. “Evolutionary Love (1893).” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
______. 1992b. “The Law of Mind (1892).” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
______. 1998. “Immortality in the Light of Synechism (1893).” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Percy, Walker. 1981. The Message in the Bottle: How Queer Man Is, How Queer Language Is, and What One Has to Do with the Other. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Rosemont, Henry. 2018. “How to Think about Morality without Moral Agents.” In Encountering China: Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy, edited by Michael J. Sandel and Paul J. D’Ambrosio. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sandel, Michael J., and Paul J. D’Ambrosio, eds. 2018. Encountering China: Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sun, Youzhong. 2000. “Review of Democracy of the Dead.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36.3: 428–434.
Telotte, J. P. 1980. “Charles Peirce and Walker Percy: From Semiotic to Narrative.” The Southern Quarterly 18.3: 65–79
______. 1989. “A Symbolic Structure for Walker Percy’s Fiction.” In Critical Essays on Walker Percy, edited by Donald J. Crowley and Sue Mitchell Crowley. Boston: G. K. Hall & Co.
Wang, Jessica Ching-Sze. 2007. John Dewey in China: To Teach and to Learn. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morgan, J. The Human Person in Confucianism: Triadic Relationships and the Possibilities of an Agapastic Semeiotic Pragmatism. Dao 19, 509–533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09744-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09744-x