Skip to main content

Theory of Literary Pneuma (Wenqi): Philosophical Reconception of a Chinese Aesthetic

Abstract

Literary pneuma (wenqi 文氣) is a foundational idea in Chinese literary thought and the theory of literary pneuma one of the major aesthetic theories in Chinese literature and art. Since its first appearance, however, this aesthetic has remained an elusive concept despite its central importance. This article adopts an interdisciplinary approach to examine major statements of wenqi in Chinese thought in relation to similar ideas in modern philosophy, aesthetics, psychoanalysis, and literary criticism. It attempts to understand its rationale, locate its conceptual groundings, and reconceptualize it into an aesthetic theory for our time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adler, Alfred. 1938. Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, Edmund. 1971. “Excerpts from A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Idea of the Sublime and Beautiful.” In Critical Theory since Plato, edited by Hazard Adams. San Diego and New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  3. Cao, Pi 曹丕. 1960a. “Discoure on Writing 典論· 論文.” In Selection of Refined Writings 文選, edited and comp. by Xiao Tong 蕭統. Taipei 台北: Qiming Shuju 啟明書局.

  4. ______. 1960b. “Letter to Wu Zhi 與吳質書.” In Selection of Refined Writings 文選, edited and comp. by Xiao Tong 蕭統. Taipei 台北: Qiming Shuju 啟明書局.

  5. Chan, Wing-tsit, ed. and trans. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  6. Congreve, William. 1695/1957. “Concerning Humour in Comedy.” In Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 3, edited by J. E. Spingarn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  7. De Bary, Wm. Theodore, ed. 1960. Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.

  8. Erikson, Erik H. 1968. Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fenichel, Otto. 1945. The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gu, Ming Dong. 2009. “From Yuanqi (Primal Energy) to Wenqi (Literary Pneuma): A Philosophical Study of a Chinese Aesthetic.” Philosophy East and West 59.1: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidegger, Martin. 1975. Early Greek Thinking. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holland, Norman. 1975. 5 Readers Reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ______. 1985. The I. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  14. Huang, Shouqi 黃壽祺 et al. 1989. Book of Changes Annotated and Translated 周易譯注. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  15. Kant, Immanuel. 1971. “Excerpts from Critique of Judgment.” In Critical Theory since Plato, edited by Hazard Adams, San Diego and New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirk, G. S. et al., ed. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with A Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lau, D. C., trans. 1963. Tao Te Ching. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  18. Li, Zehou 李澤厚. 1984. Path of Beauty 美的歷程. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe 中國社會科學出版社.

  19. Lichtenstein, Heinz. 1963. “The Dilemma of Human Identity: Notes on Self-transformation, Self-objectivation, and Metamorphosis.” Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association 11: 173–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ______. 1965. “Towards a Metapsychological Definition of the Concept of Self.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 46: 117–128.

  21. Liu, James J. Y. 1975. Theory of Chinese Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Xie 劉勰. 1981. The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons 文心雕龍. Annotated with commentaries by Zhou Zhenfu 周振甫. Beijing 北京: Renmin Wenxue Chubanshe 人民文學出版社.

  23. Mauron, Charles. 1963. Introduction to the Psychoanalysis of Mallarmé. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mencius. 1958. Correct Meaning of Mengzi’s Writings 孟子正義. Taipei 台北: Zhengzhong Shuju 正中書局.

  25. ______. 1980. Mengzi’s Writings Annotated 孟子注疏. In Thirteen Classics Annotated 十三經註疏, edited by Ruan Yuan 阮元. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  26. Pollard, David. 1978. “Ch’i in Chinese Literary Theory.” In Chinese Approaches to Literature from Confucius to LiangCh’i-ch’ao, edited by Adele A. Rickett. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruan, Yuan 阮元, ed. 1980. Thirteen Classics Annotated 十三經註疏. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  28. Said, Edward. 1975. Beginnings: Intention and Method. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sima, Qian 司馬遷. 1959. Record of the Grand Historian 史記, vol. 6. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  30. Sun, Yaoyu 孫耀煜. 1996. Theories of Ancient Chinese Literature 中國古代文學原理. Nanjing 南京: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe 江蘇教育出版社.

  31. Waelder, Robert. 1936. “The Principle of Multiple Function: Observations on Over-Determination.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 5: 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. 1996. “Questions on Qi in Chinese Literature 中國文學中的氣的問題.” In Collected Writings on Chinese Literature 中國文學論集. Taipei 台北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.

  33. Xu, Zhongyu 徐中玉 et al., comps. 1993. Collected Sayings on Dialectics of Art 藝術辯證法篇. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe 中國社會科學出版社.

  34. Yao, Nai 姚鼐. 1979. “A Reply to Lu Jifei 覆魯絜非書.” In Selected Writings of Chinese Literary Theories 中國歷代文論選, vol. 3, edited by Guo Shaoyu 郭紹虞 et al. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubashe 上海古籍出版社.

  35. Yeates, W. B. 1903. Ideas of Good and Evil. London: A. H. Bullen.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yin, Jie 殷杰. 1986. A Study of Ancient Chinese Aesthetic Theories in Literature 中國古代文學審美理論鑒識. Wuhan 武漢: Huazhong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe 華中師範大學出版社.

  37. Zheng, Yuyu 鄭毓瑜. 1988. An Inquiry of Literary Qi in the Six Dynasties 六朝文氣論探究. History and Chinese Literature Series 國立臺灣大學文史叢刊, no. 79. Taipei 台北: Guoli Taiwan Daxue Chuban Zhongxin 國立臺灣大學出版中心.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Dong Gu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, M.D. Theory of Literary Pneuma (Wenqi): Philosophical Reconception of a Chinese Aesthetic. Dao 19, 443–460 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09736-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Literary pneuma
  • Yin-yang 陰陽 theory
  • Personality
  • Aesthetics
  • Literary criticism