Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Wandering Heart-Mind: Zhuangzi and Moral Psychology in the Inner Chapters

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay examines the concept of the wandering heart-mind (youxin 遊心) in the Inner Chapters of the Zhuangzi 莊子. This essay examines the problems caused by a collection of behaviors in the heart-mind: the ability to make distinctions (bian 辨), the tendency to fix distinctions and language (chengxin 成心), and the need to act for the sake of fixed ends (wei 為). Zhuangzi treats these problems with emptying (xu 虛), wandering (you 遊), and mirroring (jing 鏡). These techniques release the heart-mind from fixation (chengxin 成心) and conflict, enabling the heart-mind to respond to conditions without acting for fixed ends (wuwei 無為). Letting the heart-mind wander provides the receptivity and creativity necessary for responding to a complex world of constant change. Letting the heart-mind wander also opens the possibility of an intrinsically beneficial moral psychology, one where the heart-mind not only adapts to but enjoys a world of transformation and uncertainty. This interpretation of the heart-mind has important consequences for psychology, language, and ethics. In terms of psychology this interpretation diagnoses the limitations of knowledge and proposes therapeutic techniques to treat uncertainty and fixation. In terms of language this interpretation reveals different linguistic attitudes in the text, such as usefulness (yong 用) and play (you 遊). In terms of ethics this interpretation provides a basis for Zhuangzi’s ethical vision of nourishing living and free-and-easy wandering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger T. 1994. “Review of A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation, by Chad Hansen.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 54.2: 553–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont, Jr., trans. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

  • Cheung, Leo K. C. 2017. “The Metaphysics and Unnamability of the Dao in the Daodejing and Wittgenstein.” Philosophy East and West 67.2: 352–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Tim. 2011. “Perspectivism as a Way of Knowing in the Zhuangzi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10.4: 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David, and Roger T. Ames. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking Through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Fraser, Chris. 2008. “Psychological Emptiness in the Zhuangzi.” Asian Philosophy 18.2: 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2011. “Emotion and Agency in Zhuangzi.” Asian Philosophy 21.1: 97–121.

  • ______. 2014. “Wandering the Way: A Eudaimonistic Approach to the Zhuangzi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13.4: 541–565.

  • Geaney, Jane. 2002. On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Angus C. 1983. “Daoist Spontaneity and the Dichotomy of ‘Is’ and ‘Ought.’” See Mair 1983.

  • ______. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Hansen, Chad. 1983. “A Tao of Tao in Chuang-tzu.” See Mair 1983.

  • ______. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hutton, Eric L. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1996. “Was Zhuangzi a Relativist?”. In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Paul Kjellberg and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • LaFargue, Michael. 1994. Dao and Method: A Reasoned Approach to the Tao Te Ching. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lau, D. C. 劉殿爵, and Chen Fong Ching 陳方正, eds. 1996. A Concordance to the Xunzi 荀子逐字索引. ICS series 香港中文大學中國文化研究所. Hong Kong 香港: Shangwu Yinshuguan 商務印書館.

  • Legge, James. 1871/1991. The Chinese Classics, Vol. IV, Part I: The First Part of the She King, or The Lessons from the States; and the Prolegomena. London: Trübner and Co.; Taipei: SMC Publishing, Inc.

  • ______. 1891/1962. The Sacred Books of the East, Vol. XXXIX: The Texts of Taoism, Part I: The Tao Te Ching of Lao Tzu; The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Books I–XVII). Mineola: Dover Publications.

  • Liu, Xiaogan. 1994. Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies Publications.

  • Mair, Victor, ed. 1983. Experimental Essays on Chuang-tzu. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • Oshima, Harold H. 1983. “A Metaphorical Analysis of the Concept of Mind in the Chuang-tzu.” See Mair 1983.

  • Plaks, Andrew. 2006. “Xin 心 as the Seat of Emotions in Confucian Self-cultivation.” In Love, Hatred, and Other Passions: Questions and Themes on Emotions in Chinese Civilization, edited by Paolo Sanangelo and Donatella Guida. Leiden: Hotei Publishing.

  • Raphals, Lisa. 1994. “Skeptical Strategies in the Zhuangzi and Theatetus.” Philosophy East and West 44.3: 501–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, Dan. 2011. “It Goes Beyond Skill.” In Ethics in Early China: An Anthology, edited by Chris Fraser, Dan Robins, and Timothy O’Leary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2004. “Conceptions of the Self in the Zhuangzi: Conceptual Metaphor Analysis and Comparative Thought.” Philosophy East and West 54.3: 322–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 1995. “Review of A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation by Chad Hansen.” Ethics 105.2: 433–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Youru. 2003. Linguistic Strategies in Daoist Zhuangzi and Chan Buddhism. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

  • Watson, Burton. 1968. The Collected Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Wong, David B. 1998. “Review of A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation by Chad Hansen.” The Journal of Asian Studies 57.3: 824–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziporyn, Brook, trans. and ed. 2009. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

  • ______. 2012. Ironies of Oneness and Difference: Coherence in Chinese Thought; Prolegomena to the Study of Li 理. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Religion and Philosophy, High Point University, One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA

    Carl Joseph Helsing

Authors
  1. Carl Joseph Helsing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Joseph Helsing.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helsing, C.J. The Wandering Heart-Mind: Zhuangzi and Moral Psychology in the Inner Chapters. Dao 18, 555–575 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-019-09686-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-019-09686-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation