Skip to main content

Improving Confucian Democracy: Replies to Elstein and Angle

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Angle, Stephen C. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, Joseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, Joshua. 1996. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Seyla Benhabib. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, Sungmoon. 2009. “Self-Transformation and Civil Society: Lockean vs. Confucian.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8.4: 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ____. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. ____. 2015a. “John Dewey and Confucian Democracy: Towards Common Citizenship.” Constellations 22: 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ____. 2015b. “Civil Confucianism in South Korea: Liberal Rights, Confucian Reasoning, and Gender Equality.” In Confucianism, Law, and Democracy in Contemporary Korea, edited by Sungmoon Kim. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ____. 2015c. “Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction.” American Political Science Review 109: 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ____. 2016. Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krause, Sharon R. 2008. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Larmore, Charles. 2003. “Public Reason.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97: 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pettit, Philip. 2012. “Meritocratic Representation.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Li Chenyang. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  17. Quong, Jonathan. 2011. Liberalism Without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, Rogers M. 2003. Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungmoon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S. Improving Confucian Democracy: Replies to Elstein and Angle. Dao 15, 453–465 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9512-z

Download citation