Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Principles, Virtues, or Detachment? Some Appreciative Reflections on Karen Stohr’s On Manners

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Karen Stohr’s book On Manners argues persuasively that rules of etiquette, though conventional, play an essential moral role, because they “serve as vehicles through which we express important moral values like respect and consideration for the needs, ideas, and opinions of others” (Stohr 2012: 3–4). Stohr frequently invokes Kantian concepts and principles in order to make her point. In Part 2 of this essay, I shall argue that the significance of etiquette is better understood using a virtue ethics framework, like that of Confucianism, rather than the language of Kantianism. Within the Chinese tradition, Daoists have frequently been critics of Confucian ritualism. Consequently, in Part 3, I shall consider some possible Daoist critiques of Stohr’s work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angle, Stephen. 2012. Sagehood. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaly, Heather, and Amy Coplan. 2008. “Diagnosing Character: A House Divided?” In House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies, edited by Henry Jacoby and William Irwin. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Benn, James A. 2005. “Buddhism, Alcohol, and Tea in Medieval China.” In Of Tripod and Palate: Food and Religion in Traditional China, edited by Roel Sterckx. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • David, Larry, and Larry Levin. 1992. “The Boyfriend: Part 1.” Seinfeld, season 3, episode 17. Directed by Tom Cherones. Originally broadcast February 12. http://www.seinology.com/scripts/script-34.shtml (last access August 11, 2015).

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius—The Secular as Sacred. San Francisco: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grow, Kory. 2014. “David Spade Explains Why He Didn’t Attend Chris Farley’s Funeral.” Rolling Stone. April 30. http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/david-spade-explains-why-he-didnt-attend-chris-farleys-funeral-20140430 (last access August 11, 2015).

  • Huxley, Aldous. 2009. The Doors of Perception, reprint. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2013. “Happiness in Early Chinese Thought.” In Oxford Handbook of Happiness, edited by Ilona Boniwell and Susan David. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, Christine. 1998. “From Duty and for the Sake of the Noble.” In Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics, edited by S. Engstrom and J. Whiting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, Robert B. 1997. “Kant’s Virtue Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, edited by Daniel Statman. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

  • Mehlman, Peter. 1993. “The Visa.” Seinfeld, season 4, episode 15. Directed by Tom Cherones. Originally broadcast January 27. http://www.seinology.com/scripts/script-55.shtml (last access August 11, 2015).

  • O’Neill, Onora. 1989. “Kant after Virtue.” In Constructions of Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1965. “Religion and Society.” In Structure and Function in Primitive Society, reprint. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartin, Catherine. 2008. “If the End Doesn’t Justify the Means then What Does?” In House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies, edited by Henry Jacoby and William Irwin. New Jersey: Wiley and Sons.

  • Schwartz, Benjamin. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Nancy. 1997. Making a Necessity of Virtue. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shun, Kwong-loi. 2002. “Ren 仁 and Li 禮 in the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Sim, May. 2007. Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Confucius: Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohr, Karen. 2012. On Manners. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Wenming 唐文明. 2012. Secret Subversion: M ou Zongsan, Kant, and Original Confucianism 隱秘的顛覆: 牟宗三、康德與原始儒家. Beijing 北京: Sanlian Shudian 三聯書店.

  • Tiwald, Justin, and Bryan W. Van Norden, eds. 2014. Readings in Later Chinese Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 1996. “Competing Interpretations of the Inner Chapters.” Philosophy East and West 46.2: 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 1999. “Method in the Madness of the Laozi.” In Essays on Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi, edited by Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2008. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2011. Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waley, Arthur. 1918. The Poet L i Po: A. D. 761–782. Reprint, Project Gutenburg, 2013. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/43274/43274-h/43274-h.htm (last access January 7, 2014).

  • Wei, Cheng-t’ung. 1986. “Chu Hsi on the Standard and the Expedient.” In C hu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism, edited by Chan Wing-tsit. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • Wicclair, Mark R. 2008. “House and Medical Paternalism.” In House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies, edited by Henry Jacoby and William Irwin. New Jersey: Wiley and Sons.

  • World Entertainment News Network. 2007. “Laurie’s Son Talked Him into Accepting OBE.” September 26. http://www.contactmusic.com/hugh-laurie/news/lauries-son-talked-him-into-accepting-obe_1044790 (last access January 18, 2016).

  • Yearley, Lee H. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan W. Van Norden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Norden, B.W. Principles, Virtues, or Detachment? Some Appreciative Reflections on Karen Stohr’s On Manners . Dao 15, 227–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9489-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9489-7

Keywords

Navigation