Skip to main content
Log in

Xiang Yuan (Village Worthies): The Appearance-only Hypocrite

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article seeks to interpret Mencius’ criticism of the village worthies (xiang yuan 鄉原) and shed light on the distinctive psychological phenomenon that Mencius has captured but not quite articulated. An attempt at filling out the Mencian view of the village worthies will help us better understand the content of the moral charges made against them and also deepen our analysis of the kind of psychology that early Confucians regard as crucial to moral agency. Following an introduction that overviews Mencius’ criticisms of the village worthies, the main discussion of this article is divided into three sections. Section 2 offers an interpretation of the psychology of the village worthy and articulates the way in which the village worthy can be regarded as a special kind of hypocrite, which I label as “appearance-only” hypocrite. Section 3 draws on the proposed interpretation to make sense of Mencius’ criticisms of the village worthy. I argue that while the village worthy can elude some common charges against hypocrisy, it is still problematic in the sense that it weakens an unstable system of morality from the inside and inflicts harm on the genuinely virtuous person. Section 4 delves deeper into analyzing the ethical implications for the self and for others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger T. 1996. “The Classical Chinese Self and Hypocrisy.” In Self and Deception: A Cross-Cultural Philosophical Enquiry, edited by Roger T. Ames and Wimal Dissanayake. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2013. “Introduction.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited by Stephen C. Angle and Michael Slote. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, Piers. 1993. “What Is Wrong with Hypocrisy?” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 8.3: 223–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, Roger, and Christopher Cowton. 1994. “Hypocrisy and Moral Seriousness.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31: 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funkhouser, Eric. 2005. “Do the Self-Deceived Get What They Want?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86: 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, Richard. 2001. “What Is the Role of the Self in Self-Deception?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101.1: 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, Eva Feder. 1982. “On Hypocrisy.” Metaphilosophy 13.3–4: 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 2002 [1979]. Confucius: The Analects. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • ____, trans. 2003 [1970]. Mencius. London: Penguin Books.

  • Lynch, Tony, and R. J. Fisher. 2012. “Pure Hypocrisy.” Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19.1: 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, Lynne. 1987. “Integrity.” Ethics 98: 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, Christine. 1991. “Hypocrisy, With a Note on Integrity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28.4: 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, Alfred. 1997. “Real Self-Deception.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Richard. 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, William. 1999. “Is Hypocrisy a Problem for Consequentialism?” Utilitas 11.3: 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shun, Kwong-loi. 2014. “Early Confucian Moral Psychology.” In Dao Companion to Classical Confucianism, edited by Vincent Shen. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Szabados, Béla, and Eldon Soifer. 2004. Hypocrisy: Ethical Investigations. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Gabriele. 1981. “Integrity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 55: 161–176.

  • ____. 1985. Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Dan. 1990. “Hypocrisy.” Metaphilosophy 21.3: 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. Jay. 2010. “Hypocrisy, Moral Address, and the Equal Standing of Persons.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38.4: 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xunzi [Hsun Tzu], A Concordance to 荀子引得. 1950. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, supp. 22. Beijing: Yenching University Press.

  • Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻, trans. and annot. 1960. Mengzi: Translation and Annotation 孟子譯注. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winnie Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sung, W. Xiang Yuan (Village Worthies): The Appearance-only Hypocrite. Dao 15, 175–192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9486-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9486-x

Keywords

Navigation