Skip to main content
Log in

Zhuangzi’s Ironic Detachment and Political Commitment

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paul Gewirtz has suggested that contemporary Chinese society lacks a shared framework. A Rortian might describe this by saying that China lacks a “final vocabulary” of “thick terms” with which to resolve ethical disagreements. I briefly examine the strengths and weaknesses of Confucianism and Legalism as potential sources of such a final vocabulary, but most of this essay focuses on Zhuangzian Daoism. Zhuangzi 莊子 provides many stories and metaphors that can inspire advocates of political pluralism. However, I suggest that Zhuangzi is ultimately an “ironist” in Rorty’s sense. Many intellectuals assume there is something progressive and liberating about broadly ironic stances like relativism and skepticism. Ethically, though, irony is “the night in which all cows are black”: since it regards all positions as equally undermined, an ironic stance cannot be enlisted in support of tolerance or humanitarianism or in opposition to absolutism or cruelty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angle, Stephen. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Chris. 2013a. “Xi Pays Homage to Confucius, a Figure Back in Favor.” New York Times Online (26 November 2013), http://nyti.ms/1dwHebC (accessed 18 February 2014).

  • ____. 2013b. “Xi Underlines Morality during Confucius Site Visit.” Xinhuanet (28 November 2013), http://nyti.ms/1dwHebC (accessed 18 February 2014).

  • Chan, Joseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho, Steve. 2004. Zhuangzi and Early Chinese Philosophy: Vagueness, Transformation, and Paradox. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 2006. Suicide, reprint. Trans. by Robin Buss. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eno, Robert. 1996. “Cook Ding’s Dao and the Limits of Philosophy.” See Kjellberg and Ivanhoe 1996.

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2013. Truth and Method reprint. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, Paul. 2014. “Xi, Mao, and China’s Search for a Usable Past.” ChinaFile (14 January), https://www.chinafile.com/xi-mao-and-chinas-search-usable-past (accessed 16 February 2014).

  • Graziani, Romain. 2005. “When Princes Awake in Kitchens: Zhuangzi’s Rewriting of a Culinary Myth.” In Of Tripod and Palate: Food, Religion and Politics in China, edited by Roel Sterckx. New York: MacMillan/Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Qiyong. 2007. “Is Confucian Ethics a ‘Consanguinism’?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6.1: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Eirik. 2012. “Han Fei on the Problem of Morality.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, edited by Paul R. Goldin. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Huang, Yong. 2010. “The Ethics of Difference in the Zhuangzi.Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78.1: 65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation, rev. ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2009. “Pluralism, Toleration, and Ethical Promiscuity.” Journal of Religious Ethics 37.2: 311–329.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J., and Bryan W. Van Norden, eds. 2005. Readings in Early Chinese Philosophy, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Soren. 1992. The Concept of Irony/Schelling Lecture Notes, reprint. Trans. by Howard V. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, Paul, and Philip J. Ivanhoe. 1996. Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundera, Milan. 1996. The Book of Laughter and Forgetting, reprint. Trans. by Aaron Asher. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James, trans. 1991. Chun Tsew with the Tso Chuen, vol. 5 of The Chinese Classics, reprint. Taipei: SMC Publishing.

  • Li, Yong. 2012. “The Confucian Puzzle.” Asian Philosophy 22.1: 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Qinping. 2007. “Confucianism and Corruption: An Analysis of Shun’s Two Actions Described by Mencius.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6.1: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Trans. by Geoff Bennington. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue, 3rd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, A. P. 2014. “Political Theory and Linguistic Criteria in Hanfeizi’s Philosophy.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13.3: 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaigne, Michel de. 1958. The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Trans. by Donald Frame. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Nivison, David S. 1956. “Communist Ethics and Chinese Tradition.” Journal of Asian Studies 16.1: 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1996. “Philosophical Voluntarism in Fourth Century China.” In The Ways of Confucianism. Chicago: Open Court Press.

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1878. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear.” Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphals, Lisa. 1996. “Skeptical Strategies in the Zhuangzi and the Theatetus. See Kjellberg and Ivanhoe 1996.

  • ____. 2002. “A Woman Who Understood the Rites.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1985. “Rationality.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences, vol. 2 of Philosophical Papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tiwald, Justin. 2008. “A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7.3: 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwald, Justin, and Bryan W. Van Norden, eds. 2014. Readings in Later Chinese Philosophy: Han Dynasty to the 20th Century. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 1996. “Competing Interpretations of the Inner Chapters.” Philosophy East and West 46.2: 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008a. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • ____. 2008b. “On ‘Humane Love’ and ‘Kinship Love.’” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7.2: 125–129.

  • ____. 2011. Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • ____. 2012. “Han Feizi and Confucianism: Toward a Synthesis.” In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, edited by Paul R. Goldin. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Watson, Burton, trans. 1964. Chuang Tzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Wang, Robin, ed. 2003. Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, David. 2005. “Zhuangzi and the Obsession with Being Right.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22.2: 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2006. Natural Moralities. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Yearley, Lee H. 1983. “The Perfected Person in the Radical Chuang-tzu.” In Experimental Essays on Chuang Tzu, edited by Victor Mair. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1991. “Bourgeois Relativism and the Comparative Study of the Self.” In Tracing Common Themes: Comparative Courses in the Study of Religion, edited by John Carman and Steven Hopkins. Altanta: Scholars Press.

  • ____. 1996. “Zhuangzi’s Understanding of Skillfulness and the Ultimate Spiritual State.” See Kjellberg and Ivanhoe 1996.

  • Yu, Dan. 2009. Confucius from the Heart. Trans. by Esther Tyldesley. New York: Atria/Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziporyn, Brook, trans. 2009. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan W. Van Norden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Norden, B.W. Zhuangzi’s Ironic Detachment and Political Commitment. Dao 15, 1–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9471-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9471-9

Keywords

Navigation