Dao

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 369–389 | Cite as

The Tacit Rejection of Multiculturalism in American Philosophy Ph.D. Programs: The Case of Chinese Philosophy

Article

Abstract

At the confluence of the philosophy of education and social/political philosophy lies the question of how we should educate the next generation of philosophy professors. Part of the question involves how broad such an education should be in order to educate teachers with the ability to, themselves, educate citizens competent to function in a diverse, globalized world. As traditional Western education systems from elementary schools through universities have embraced multicultural sources over the last few decades, philosophy Ph.D. programs have bucked this trend, clinging tightly to traditional Western sources and problems. While this claim will come as no surprise to those working in the field, there is little published evidence or discussion of the tacit rejection of multiculturalism by philosophy Ph.D. programs, and few people outside the field realize how Eurocentric these programs remain. This article provides evidence and discussion of this fact, focusing on the case of Chinese philosophy in American Ph.D. programs.

Keywords

Chinese philosophy Philosophy Ph.D. programs Multiculturalism Diversity Philosophy of education Social philosophy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of Pacific Rim Universities. 2014. “Members Map.” http://apru.org/members/member-universities/itemlist/category/235-usa. Accessed February 27.
  2. Bruya, Brian, ed. 2015. The Philosophical Challenge from China. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  3. Columbia University. 2013. “Global Core Approved Course List.” December 6. http://gs.columbia.edu/files/gs/global-core.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  4. ______. 2014a. “Curriculum Development.” https://www.college.columbia.edu/core/committee. Accessed February 27.
  5. ______. 2014b. “Department of Philosophy.” http://philosophy.columbia.edu. Accessed February 27.
  6. ______. 2014c. “Directory of Classes.” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/bulletin/uwb/. Accessed February 27.
  7. ______. 2014d. “Faculty (Regular).” http://philosophy.columbia.edu/faculty/regular. Accessed February 27.
  8. Columbia University Committee on Global Core. 2013–14. “Course Review for the Global Core Requirement.” http://www.college.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/the_global_core_requirement_checklist_2013-2014.pdf.
  9. Ernst, Zachary. 2009. “Our Naked Emperor: The Philosophical Gourmet Report.” http://www.dropbox.com/s/qd9gdl7ozofhit0/emperor-1.pdf?dl=0APS_DEA_Science_Final.pdf.
  10. Francis, Leslie P. 2008. “I Cannot Imagine our Department without Asian Philosophy.” Newsletter on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies 8. 1: 17.Google Scholar
  11. Frodeman, Robert, and Jennifer Rowland. 2009. “De-Disciplining the Humanities.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 29: 62–72.Google Scholar
  12. Hart Research Associates. 2009. “Trends and Emerging Practices in General Education.” http://www.aacu.org/membership/documents/2009MemberSurvey_Part2.pdf.
  13. Heck, Richard. 2014. “About the Philosophical Gourmet Report.” Last modified January 17. http://rgheck.frege.org/philosophy/aboutpgr.php. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  14. Indiana University, Bloomington. 2014. “History of Philosophy.” http://www.indiana.edu/~phil/areas/history.shtml. Accessed February 27.
  15. Lachs, John. 1996. “What Constitutes a Pluralistic Philosophy Department?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70.2 (November): 167–168.Google Scholar
  16. Leiter, Brian. 2012. “The Five Most Common Objections to the PGR.” Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog. February 1. http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2012/02/the-five-most-common-objections-to-the-pgr.html. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  17. McAfee, Noëlle. 2007. “Philosophy Rankings.” GonePublic: Philosophy, Politics, & Public Life (blog). November 24. http://gonepublic.net/2007/11/24/philosophy-rankings/?relatedposts_exclude=443. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  18. ______. 2010a. “Ranking Continental Philosophy Programs.” GonePublic: Philosophy, Politics, & Public Life (blog). October 21. http://gonepublic.net/2010/10/21/ranking-continental-philosophy-programs. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  19. ______. 2010b. “The Shadow of a Phantom or How to Do a Survey.” GonePublic: Philosophy, Politics, & Public Life (blog). November 8. http://gonepublic.net/2010/11/08/the-shadow-of-a-phantom-or-how-to-do-a-survey. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  20. ______. 2011. “The Favorites’ Favorites: Another Round of PGR Rankings of Continental Philosophy.” GonePublic: Philosophy, Politics, & Public Life (blog). November 15. http://gonepublic.net/2011/11/15/the-favorites-favorites-another-round-of-pgr-rankings-of-continental-philosophy. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  21. ______. 2014. “Is the PGR Sexist?” GonePublic: Philosophy, Politics, & Public Life (blog). February 12. http://gonepublic.net/2014/02/12/is-the-pgr-sexist. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  22. Putnam, Hilary, and Ruth Anna Putnam. 1993. “Education for Democracy.” Educational Theory 43.4 (December): 361–376.Google Scholar
  23. Quinn, Philip L. 1996. “Pluralism in Philosophy Departments.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70.2 (November): 168–172.Google Scholar
  24. Saul, Jennifer. 2012. “Ranking Exercises in Philosophy and Implicit Bias.” Journal of Social Philosophy 43.3 (September): 256–273.Google Scholar
  25. Stuhr, John T. 1996. “Fundamentalism and the Empire of Philosophy: What Constitutes a Pluralist Department?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70.2 (November): 172–179.Google Scholar
  26. University of Chicago. 2009. “Philosophical Perspectives on the Humanities: Syllabi from Previous Years.” Humanities Division. http://home.uchicago.edu/bridges/philosophicalperspectives/syllabi.htm.
  27. ______. 2013–14a. “The Curriculum.” 2013–2014 College Catalog. http://collegecatalog.uchicago.edu/thecollege/thecurriculum. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  28. ______. 2013–14b. “Humanities.” 2013–2014 College Catalog. http://collegecatalog.uchicago.edu/thecollege/humanities. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  29. ______. 2014a. “The Core.” https://collegeadmissions.uchicago.edu/academics/core. Accessed February 27.
  30. ______. 2014b. “The Department of Philosophy.” http://philosophy.uchicago.edu/welcome.html. Accessed February 27.
  31. Walker, Margaret Urban. 2004. “Waiter, There’s a Fly in My Soup! Reflections on the Philosophical Gourmet Report.” Hypatia 19.3: 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wheeler, Gregory. 2012a. “Manufacturing Assent: The Philosophical Gourmet Report’s Sampling Problem.” Choice & Inference (blog). April 17. http://choiceandinference.com/2012/04/17/manufactured-assent-the-philosophical-gourmet-reports-sampling-problem. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  33. ______. 2012b. “More on the Educational Imbalance within the PGR Evaluator Pool.” Choice & Inference (blog). April 19. http://choiceandinference.com/2012/04/19/more-on-the-educational-imbalance-within-the-pgr-evaluator-pool. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  34. ______. 2012c. “Two Reasons for Abolishing the PGR.” Choice & Inference (blog). April 24. http://choiceandinference.com/2012/04/24/two-reasons-for-abolishing-the-pgr. Accessed February 27, 2014.
  35. Wilshire, Bruce W. 2002. Fashionable Nihilism: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, Robin. 2005. “Deep Thought, Quantified.” The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Faculty. 51.37 (May 20): A8.Google Scholar
  37. Winn, Ralph B. 1959. John Dewey: Dictionary of Education. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, Kathleen. 1996. “Pluralism on the Undergraduate Level.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70.2 (November 1996): 179–187.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Section, Department of History and PhilosophyEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA

Personalised recommendations