Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper brings a fresh, epistemic perspective to bear on prominent Confucian philosophers’ arguments for (1) a hybrid Deweyan-Confucian democracy, or (2) for an illiberal democracy with “Confucian characteristics.” Reconstructing principles for epistemic elitism and paternalism from the pre-Qin 秦 Confucian thought that inspires these advocates for Confucian democracy, it finds two major problems with their proposals. For those who abandon or modify this epistemic elitism and paternalism in accordance with (1), the result is a philosophical syncretism that is either unconvincingly Confucian or unconvincingly Deweyan. For those who retain it in accordance with (2), the result is a democratic proposal that will lack legitimacy in increasingly pluralistic East Asian societies. In the end, there is a need for thinking that appropriately synthesizes Eastern and Western philosophies in a politically changing East Asia, but it would benefit from being less “Confucian.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger. 2003. “Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: A Dialogue.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30.3–4: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analects. 1996. Trans. by Arthur Waley. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth.

  • Bell, Daniel. 1999. “Democracy with Chinese Characteristics: A Political Proposal for the Post-Communist Era.” Philosophy East and West 49.4: 451–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2006a. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2006b. “Deliberative Democracy with Chinese Characteristics: A Comment on Baogang HE’s Research.” In The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China, edited by Ethan Leib and HE Baogang. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

  • ____. 2008. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2009. “Toward Meritocratic Rule in China?: A Response to Professors Dallmayr, Li and Tan.” Philosophy East and West 59.4: 554–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2010. China’s New Confucianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Book of Poetry. 1931. Trans. by James Legge. Shanghai: The Chinese Book Company.

  • Book of Rites, part 1. 2003. Trans. by James Legge. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.

  • Chan, Joseph. 2000a. “Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29.1: 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2002. “Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism.” Philosophy East and West 52.3: 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Sin Yee. 2000b. “Gender and Relationship Roles in the Analects and the Mencius.” Asian Philosophy 10.2: 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ci, Jiwei. 2001. “The Confucian Relational Concept of the Person and Its Modern Predicament.” In Personhood and Health Care, edited by David Thomasma, David Weisstub, and Christian Herve. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Cline, Erin. 2003. “Autonomy or Appropriateness? Contrasting Selves in The Democracy of the Dead.” Southwest Philosophical Review 19.1: 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, Lorraine. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1990a. Experience and Nature. In John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, vol.1, edited by Joanne Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • ____. 1990b. The Public and Its Problems. In John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, vol. 2, edited by Joanne Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • ____. 1990c. Freedom and Culture. In John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, vol. 13, edited by Joanne Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • Economy, Elizabeth. 2010. The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China’s Future. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, David. 2011. “Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9.4: 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eun, Ki-soo. 2003. “Changing Roles of the Family and State for Elderly Care: A Confucian Perspective.” In Aging and Challenges to Families, edited by Vern Bengston and Ariela Lowenstein. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Goldman, A. 1992. Liasons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Shengzu, and Jersey Liang. 2000. “China: Population Aging and Old Age Support.” In Aging in East and West: Families, States and the Elderly, edited by Vern Bengston. New York: Springer.

  • Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1999. Democracy of the Dead: Dewey, Confucius, and the Hope for Democracy in China. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Hiratsuka, Raichō 平塚らいてう. 1913. From a Round Window 丸窓より. Tokyo 東京: Shinonomedō Shoten 東雲堂書店.

  • Hu, Yow-Hwey, and Chou Yah-Jong. 2000. “The Cultural Politics of the Asian Family Care Model: Missing Language and Facts.” In Who Should Care for the Elderly: An East–west Value Divide, edited by William Liu and Hal Kendig. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

  • Ikels, Charlotte. 2004. “Introduction.” In Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia, edited by Charlotte Ikels. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Ishibashi, Katsuhiko. 石橋克彦. 2011. “Naturally It’s an Earthquake Disaster まさに原発震災だ.” The World 世界May: 126–133.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip. 2007. “The Shade of Confucius: Social Roles, Ethical Theory and the Self.” In Polishing the Chinese Mirror: Essays in Honour of Henry Rosemont, edited by Marthe Chandler and Ronnie Littlejohn. New York: Global Scholarly Publications.

  • Jiang, Qing. 2012. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Trans. by Edmund Ryden, edited by Daniel Bell and Fan Ruiping. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sunhyuk. 2000. “Democratization and Environmentalism: South Korea and Taiwan in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 35.3: 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, Shizuko. 2013. Ryōsai Kenbo, The Educational Ideal of “Good Wife, Wise Mother” in Modern Japan. Trans. by Stephen Filler. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

  • Lee, Eliza, Joseph Chan, Elaine Chan, Peter Cheung, and Lam Wai-Fung. 2013. Public Policymaking in Hong Kong: Civic Engagement and State-society Relations in a Semi-democracy, vol. 13. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Lilian. 2007. Fighting Famine in North China: State, Market, and Environmental Decline, 1690s–1990s. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Qingping. 2007. “Confucianism and Corruption: An Analysis of Shun’s Two Actions Described by Mencius.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6.1: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, Stephanie. 2002. “Proposed Filial Piety Law Provokes Debate Amongst Lawmakers.” Taipei Times January 10. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/2002/01/10/119331 (last accessed November 13, 2012).

  • Ma, Ngok. 2007. Political Development in Hong Kong: State, Political Society and Civil Society. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, Thomas. 1998. The Western Concept of a Civil Society in the Context of Chinese History. Stanford: Hoover Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2005. A Cloud Across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash between Chinese and Western Political Philosophies Today. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius. 2005. Trans. by D. C. Lau. London: Penguin Classics.

  • Nakane, Chie. 1970. Japanese Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neo, Harvey. 2007. “Challenging the Developmental State: Nature Conservation in Singapore.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48.2: 186–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, Shaun. 2003. “Democracy and Confucian Values.” Philosophy East and West 53.1: 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Jinjoo, Suzie Hesook, Dianne Martins, and Kim Heegul. 2006. “A Study of Elder Abuse in Korea.” Nursing Studies 43.2: 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, Susan. 1990. Losing Face: Status Politics in Japan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1996. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry. 2006. “Two Loci of Authority: Autonomous Individuals and Related Persons.” In Confucian Cultures of Authority, edited by Peter Hershock and Roger Ames. Albany: SUNY Press.

  • Rosemont, Henry, and Roger Ames. 2008. “Family Reverence (xiao 孝) as the Source of Consummatory Conduct (ren 仁).” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7.1: 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoppa, Leonard. 2006. Race for the Exits: The Unravelling of Japan’s System of Social Protection. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull. 2012. Confucianism and Democracy in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Kyu-taik. 2000. “Asian Perspective on Aging East and West: Filial Piety and Changing Families.” In Aging in East and West: Families, States and the Elderly, edited by Vern Bengston, Kim Kyong-Dong, and George Myers. New York: Springer.

  • ____. 2001. “Elder Respect: Exploration of Ideals and Forms in East Asia.” Journal of Aging Studies 15: 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Sor Hoon. 2003. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2012. “Democracy in Confucianism.” Philosophy Compass 7.5: 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomida, Hiroko. 2000. Hiratsuka Raicho and Early Japanese Feminism. Boston: Brill.

  • Tu, Wei-ming. 1990. “The Confucian Dimension in the East Asian Development Model.” Kasarinlan 5.4: 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1998. “Probing the ‘Three Bonds’ and ‘Five Relationships’ in Confucian Humanism.” In Confucianism and the Family, edited by Walter Slote and George De Vos. Albany: SUNY Press.

  • ____. 2000. “Implications of the ‘Rise’ of ‘Confucian’ East Asia.” Daedalus 29.1: 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Elsie, Catherine So-kum Yeung, and Dannii Yeung. 2002. “No Safe Haven: A Review of Elderly Abuse in Chinese Families.” Trauma, Violence and Abuse 3.3: 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Global Japanese Studies, Meiji University, Nakano, Tokyo, Japan

    Shaun O’Dwyer

Authors
  1. Shaun O’Dwyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun O’Dwyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Dwyer, S. Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy. Dao 14, 33–54 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9415-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9415-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation