Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Human Rights Debate on Physical Security, Political Liberty, and the Confucian Tradition

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many East and West debates on human rights. One of them is whether all civil and political rights are human rights. On one hand, scholars generally agree that rights to physical security are human rights. On the other hand, some scholars argue that rights to political liberty are only Western rights but not human rights because political liberty conflicts with some East Asian cultural factors, especially the Confucian tradition. I argue that physical security also conflicts with some parts of the Confucian tradition, but rights to physical security are still human rights because physical security is a minimal value. I then argue that political liberty, similar to physical security, is also a minimal value. Therefore, similar to rights to physical security, rights to political liberty are also human rights, even though political liberty also conflicts with some parts of the Confucian tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger. 1988. “Rites as Rights: The Confucian Alternative.” In Human Rights and the World's Religions, edited by Leroy S. Rouner. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen. 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen, and Marina Svensson, eds. 2002. The Chinese Human Rights Reader: Documents and Commentary, 1900–2000. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Joanne, and Daniel Bell, eds. 1999. The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel. 1996. “The East Asian Challenge to Human Rights: Reflections on an East West Dialogue.” Human Rights Quarterly 18: 660–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1998. “Asian Communitarianism.” In Confucian Democracy, Why & How, edited by Hahm Chaibong, Hahm Chaihark, and David Hall. Kyŏnggi-do Koyang-si, Korea: Chŏnt’ong kwa Hyŏndae.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1999. “Which Rights Are Universal?” Political Theory 27.6: 849–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2000. East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2004. “Communitarian Philosophy and East Asian Politics.” In Communitarian Politics in Asia, edited by Huat Chua Beng. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2006a. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2006b. “East Asia and the West: The Impact of Confucianism on Anglo-American Political Theory.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, edited by John Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008. China’s New Confucianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2010a. “Reconciling Socialism and Confucianism? Reviving Tradition in China.” Dissent Winter: 91–99.

  • ____. 2010b. “Daniel A. Bell Replies.” Dissent Winter: 101–102.

  • Bloom, Irene. 1998. “Mencius and Human Rights.” In Confucianism and Human Rights, edited by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Tu Weiming. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Brook, Timothy, Jerome Bourgon, and Gregory Blue. 2008. Death by a Thousand Cuts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen. 1989. “Assessing the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” Ethics 99: 852–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Joseph. 1999. “A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights for Contemporary China.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne Bauer and Daniel Bell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Carson, Hsieh Yu-wei, Hsu Foo-kwan, Mou Chung-san, and T’ang Chun-i. 1958. “A Manifesto on the Reappraisal of Chinese Culture.” Reprinted in: T’ang Chun-I, 1988. Essays on Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.

  • Conner, Alison. 1998. “Confucianism and Due Process.” In Confucianism and Human Rights, edited by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Tu Weiming. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Sam. 2009. “Mencius on Torture.” April 29. http://uselesstree.typepad.com/useless_tree/2009/04/mencius-on-torture.html (retrieved September 27, 2010).

  • de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1985. “Confucian Liberalism and Western Parochialism: A Response to Paul A. Cohen.” Philosophy East and West 35.4: 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1998. “Confucianism and Human Rights in China.” In Democracy in East Asia, edited by Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Michael. 1997. Ways of War and Peace. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelman, Paul, and Joseph Miller, eds. 1998. Macmillan Encyclopedia of World Slavery. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, John. 1999. “China and the Quest for Dignity.” The National Interest 55 (Spring): 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Yu-Lan. 1948. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Xinquan 何信全. 1996. Confucianism and the Contemporary Democracy: A Research on the Political Philosophy of Neo-Confucianism 儒學與現代民主:當代新儒家政治哲學研究. Taipei 台北: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Zhongguo Wenhua Yanjiusuo 中央研究院中國文化研究所.

  • Henkin, Louis. 1986. “The Human Rights Idea in Contemporary China: A Comparative Perspective.” In Human Rights in Contemporary China, edited by Randle Edwards, Louis Henkin, and Andrew Nathan. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsü, Leonard Shihlien. 1932. The Political Philosophy of Confucianism. New York: E. P. Button & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihara, Craig. 2004. “Are Individual Rights Necessary? A Confucian Perspective.” In Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community, edited by Shun Kwong-Loi and David Wong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Qing. 2011. “From Mind Confucianism to Political Confucianism,” trans. by Wang Qingxin K. In The Renaissance of Confucianism in Contemporary China, edited by Fan Ruiping. New York: Springer.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1795/2006. Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. New York: Yale University Press.

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 1992. The Analects. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • ____, trans. 2003. Mencius. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • Lee, Seung-hwan. 1996. “Liberal Rights or/and Confucian Virtues?” Philosophy East and West 46.3: 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Xiaorong. 2006. Ethics, Human Rights and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Shu-Hsien. 1998. Understanding Confucian Philosophy: Classical and Sung-Ming. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2007. “Democratic Ideal and Practice: A Critical Reflection.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34.2: 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, James. 2007. Making Sense of Human Rights. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peerenboom, Randall. 1998. “Law and Ritual in Chinese Philosophy.” In Routledge of Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward Craig. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Junius P., ed. 1997. The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry Jr. 1988. “Why Take Rights Seriously? A Confucian Critique.” In Human Rights and the World’s Religions, edited by Leroy S. Rouner. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1991. A Chinese Mirror: Moral Reflections on Political Economy and Society. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, Stuart R, ed. 1974. M ao Tse-Tung Unrehearsed: Talks and Letters, 1956–1971. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Henry. 1996. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1997. Human Rights and Asian Values (Sixteenth Morgenthau Memorial Lecture). New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs. Published in a shortened form in The New Republic, 14–21 July 1997.

  • ____. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.

  • ____. 2004. “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32.4: 315–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Marina. 2002. Debating Human Rights in China: A Conceptual and Political History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • T’ang, Chun-i (Tang Junyi) 唐君毅. 1974. The Reconstruction of Humanity 人文精神之重建. Taipei 台北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.

  • ____. 1988. Essays on Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.

  • Taylor, Charles. 1999. “Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne Bauer and Daniel Bell. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1987. Interpretation and Social Criticism: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 1985. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1995. “Response.” In Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, edited by Michael Walzer and David Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2010. “Michael Walzer Responds.” Dissent Winter: 100–101.

  • Yasuaki, Onuma. 1999. “Toward an Intercivilizational Approach to Human Rights.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne Bauer and Daniel Bell. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedict S. B. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, B.S.B. A Human Rights Debate on Physical Security, Political Liberty, and the Confucian Tradition. Dao 13, 567–588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9403-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9403-0

Keywords

Navigation