Advertisement

Dao

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 53–62 | Cite as

Reading Xunzi through Nāmā: Two Ancient Inquiries into the Nature of Names

  • Laurie L. PattonEmail author
Article

Abstract

This essay is a comparison between two ancient theories of language—the 5th century BCE Indian etymologist Yāska and the 4th century BCE Chinese philosopher Xunzi 荀子. Specifically, it is a reading of the theory of “the rectification of names” in Xunzi through the lens of Yāska. Xunzi is known for his view that humanity’s innate tendencies need to be shaped through education and ritual. Similarly, ancient Indian authors like Yāska understand that a person is created, or made, through the performance of Vedic sacrifice. Both thinkers’ constructivist theories of language and meaning proceed from these ritual assumptions. However, Yāska would query Xunzi’s inherent distrust of multiple meanings of words and their negative effects on a functional state. Guided instead by a theory of the transcendence of Vedic language, Yāska would argue that the more one can proliferate possible meanings the more powerful a word becomes.

Keywords

Xunzi Yāska Chinese theories of meaning Indian theories of meaning Ancient etymology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clooney, Francis X. 1993. Theology after Vedanta: An Experiment in Comparative Theology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. _____. 1996. Seeing Through Texts: Doing Theology among the Srivaisnavas of South India. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Falk, Maryla. 2006. Dharma Rupa and Namarupa: Origins and Aspects of an Ancient Indian Conception. Delhi: Jain Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Goldin, Paul Rakita. 1999. Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  5. Makeham, John. 1994. Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Patton, Laurie. 1996. Myth as Argument: The Bṛhaddevatā as Canonical Commentary. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
  7. _____, and Vernon Robbins, with Gordon Newby. 2009. “Comparative Sacred Texts and Interactive Interpretation: Another Alternative to the ‘World Religions’ Class.” Teaching Theology and Religion 12.1: 37–49.Google Scholar
  8. Prasad, Mantrini. 1975. The Language of the Nirukta. Delhi: DK Publishing House.Google Scholar
  9. Der Ṛg Veda. 1951. Trans. by Karl F. Geldner. Revised Ed., Harvard Oriental Series, Vol. 33. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ṛg Veda Saṃhitā, together with the Commentary of Sāyaṇa Āchārya. 1951–1984. 5 vols. Poona: Vaidika Samshodana Maṇḍala.Google Scholar
  11. Rig Veda: A Metrically Restored Text with an Introduction and Notes. 1994. Edited by Barend Van Nooten and Gary Holland. Harvard Oriental Series, Vol. 50. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sarup, Lakshman. 1984. The Nighantu and the Nirukta. Reprint of 1927 volume. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  13. Watson, Burton, trans. 2003. Xunzi: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Yang, S.-Y., William. 1989. “Language in China: A Chapter in the History of Linguistics.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17.2: 183–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations