Skip to main content

Reply to Critics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • –––––. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • –––––. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

  • Feng, Youlan 馮友蘭. 2001. Collected Works of F eng Youlan 三松堂全集. Zhengzhou: Henan Renmin Chubanshe.

  • Huang, Yong. 2010. “The Self-centeredness Objection to Virtue Ethics: Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucian Response.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84(4): 651-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ming-huei 李明輝. 1990. Confucianism and Kant 儒家與康德. Taipei: Lianjing Press.

  • Springer, Elise. 2013. Communicating Moral Concern: An Ethics of Critical Responsiveness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Zhu, Xi. 1990. Learning to Be a Sage. Trans. Daniel K. Gardner. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • –––––. 朱熹. 1997. Classified Conversations of Master Zhu 朱子語類. Changsha: Yuelu Shushe.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen C. Angle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angle, S.C. Reply to Critics. Dao 12, 381–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9340-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9340-3

Keywords

  • Neo-Confucianism
  • Harmony
  • Individual
  • Iris Murdoch
  • Zhu Xi
  • Mou Zongsan
  • Morality
  • Prudence
  • Inwardness