Reply to Critics

Dao volume 12, pages 381–388 (2013)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Angle, Stephen C. 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Book Google Scholar
–––––. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
–––––. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Feng, Youlan 馮友蘭. 2001. Collected Works of F eng Youlan 三松堂全集. Zhengzhou: Henan Renmin Chubanshe.
Huang, Yong. 2010. “The Self-centeredness Objection to Virtue Ethics: Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucian Response.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84(4): 651-92.
Article Google Scholar
Lee, Ming-huei 李明輝. 1990. Confucianism and Kant 儒家與康德. Taipei: Lianjing Press.
Springer, Elise. 2013. Communicating Moral Concern: An Ethics of Critical Responsiveness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zhu, Xi. 1990. Learning to Be a Sage. Trans. Daniel K. Gardner. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
–––––. 朱熹. 1997. Classified Conversations of Master Zhu 朱子語類. Changsha: Yuelu Shushe.

Philosophy Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 06459, USA
Stephen C. Angle

Authors

Stephen C. Angle
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Correspondence to Stephen C. Angle.

Angle, S.C. Reply to Critics. Dao 12, 381–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9340-3