Skip to main content
Log in

On the Conditions of Possibility for Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy

Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay, we present a theory of intercultural philosophical dialogue and comparative philosophy, drawing on both hermeneutics and analytic philosophy. We advocate the approach of “de-essentialization” across the board. It is true that similarities and differences are always to be observed across languages and traditions, but there exist no immutable cores or essences. “De-essentialization” applies to all “levels” of concepts: everyday notions such as green and qing 青, philosophical concepts such as emotion(s) and qing 情, and philosophical categories such as forms of life and dao 道. We argue that interpretation is a holistic multi-directional process constrained by the principle of mutual attunement. It is necessary to assume that “the other” is a human being, who, in most cases, is consistent and stating that which is true or right. This is the condition of possibility for intercultural philosophical dialogue and comparative philosophy. No more necessary conditions are needed. There is no need to presuppose concepts or categories that are universal for all humans and their languages (such as emotion(s) and qing 情).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allinson, Robert E. 2001. “The Myth of Comparative Philosophy or the Comparative Philosophy Malgré Lui.” In Two Roads to Wisdom?: Chinese and Analytical Philosophical Traditions. Ed. By Mou Bo. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Burik, Steven. 2009. The End of Comparative Philosophy and the Task of Comparative Philosophy: Heidegger, Derrida, and Daoism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chung-ying. 2007. “Reinterpreting Gongsun Longzi and Critical Comments on Other Interpretations.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34: 537-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Kim Chong. 2010. “Zhuangzi and Hui Shi on Qing 情.” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies New Series 40 (1): 21-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald 1980. Essays on Actions & Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1986. A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs. In Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by E. LePore. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Frege, Gottlob 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. 1989. Truth and Method, 2nd revised edition. New York: Continuum (1st edition 1975).

  • Graham, A.C. 1992. “Conceptual Schemes and Linguistic Relativism in Relation to Chinese.” In Unreason Within Reason: Essays of the Outskirts of Rationality. Ed. by A.C. Graham. La Salle IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad. 2007. “Prolegomena to Future Solutions to ‘White-Horse Not Horse’.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34: 473-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1957. Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Vol. 79, Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt a/M: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Lydia H. 1995. Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity–China, 1900-1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, Dirk J. 2001. “Ubuntu and the Challenges of Multiculturalism in Post-apartheid South Africa.” Quest 15: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Lin. 2006. “Deciphering Heidegger’s Connection with the Daodejing.” Asian Philosophy 16: 149-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008. Heidegger on East-West Dialogue: Anticipating the Event. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelfelder, D.P., and R.E. Palmers, eds. 1989. Dialogue & Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. 1990. The Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramose, Mogobe. 1999. African Philosophy Through Ubuntu. Harare: Mond Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Vincent. 2003. “Some Thoughts on Intercultural Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30:357-372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smid, Robert W. 2009. Methodologies of Comparative Philosophy: The Pragmatist and Process Traditions. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, Joan. 1991. “Imaginary dialogue between Heidegger and a Buddhist with Apologies for Possible Implausibilities of Personalities.” Eastern Buddhist 24 (1): 123-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1994. The politics of recognition. In Multiculturalism, edited by A. Gutman. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

  • Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Brakel, Jaap. 1994. “Emotions: A Cross-cultural Perspective on Forms of Life.” In Social Perspectives on Emotion. Ed. by W.M. Wentworth and J. Ryan. Greenwich USA: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2004. “The Empirical Stance and the Colour War.” Divinatio: Studia Culturologica (Sofia: MSHS) 20:7-26.

  • ____. 2006. “De-essentialising across the Board: No Need to Speak the Same Language.” Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie 35:263-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Tao. 1996. “Colour Terms in Shang Oracle Bone Inscriptions.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 59 (1): 63-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2007. “Shang Ritual Animals: Colour and Meaning (part 1).” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 70: 305-372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001 (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Dainian. 2002. Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, L., van Brakel, J. On the Conditions of Possibility for Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Dao 12, 297–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9330-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9330-5

Keywords

Navigation