, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 275–293 | Cite as

Xunzi on Moral Expertise

  • Justin TiwaldEmail author


This paper is about two proposals endorsed by Xunzi. The first is that there is such a thing as a moral expert, whose moral advice we should adopt even when we cannot appreciate for ourselves the considerations in favor of it. The second is that certain political authorities should be treated as moral experts. I identify three fundamental questions about moral expertise that contemporary philosophy has yet to address in depth, explicate Xunzi’s answers to them, and then give an account of politically authorized moral expertise as Xunzi understands it. The three questions at the heart of this study are these: how should we distinguish between knowing the correct course of action on another’s authority and knowing it for oneself? What exactly are the underlying considerations that the expert grasps and the novice does not? Who are the experts and in what spheres of life can they legitimately claim expertise?


Xunzi Autonomy Political authority Moral cultivation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Analects 論語. In The Collected Commentaries on the Analects 論語集注. Edited by zhu Xi 朱熹. Sibu beiyao edition.Google Scholar
  2. Anscombe, G.E.M. 1981. “Authority in Morals.” In Ethics, Religion and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell: 43–50.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1998. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, Joseph 陳祖為. 2002. “Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism.” Philosophy East and West 52.3: 281–310.Google Scholar
  5. Cholbi, Michael. 2007. “Moral Expertise and the Credentials Problem.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10.4: 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Driver, Julia. 2006. “Autonomy and the Asymmetry Problem for Moral Expertise.” Philosophical Studies 128.3: 619–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser, Chris J. 2011. “Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10.2: 127–48.Google Scholar
  8. Hills, Alison. 2009. “Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology.” Ethics 120.1: 94–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hopkins, Robert. 2007. “What Is Wrong with Moral Testimony?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 611–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. _____. 2011. “How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony.” Journal of Philosophy 2011.3: 138–57.Google Scholar
  11. Hutton, Eric L. 2000. “Does Xunzi Have a Consistent Theory of Human Nature?” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000, 220–36.Google Scholar
  12. _____, trans. 2005. “Xunzi.” In Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Philip J. Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden, 255–309. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  13. _____, trans. forthcoming. Xunzi. Google Scholar
  14. Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. “Human Nature and Moral Understanding in the Xunzi.” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000, 237–251.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, Karen. 1999. “Second-hand Moral Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 96.2: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kline III, T.C. 2000. “Moral Agency and Motivation in the Xunzi.” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000, 155–175.Google Scholar
  17. Kline III, T.C., and Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds. 2000. Virtue, Nature and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  18. Knoblock, John. 1988, 1990, 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. 3 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McGrath, Sarah. 2011. “Skepticism about Moral Expertise as a Puzzle for Moral Realism.” Journal of Philosophy, 108.3: 111–137.Google Scholar
  20. Nivison, David S. 1996. “Critique of David B. Wong ‘Xunzi on Moral Motivation.’” In Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture: Nivison and His Critics. Edited by Philip J. Ivanhoe. Chicago: Open Court, 323–31.Google Scholar
  21. Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Wong, David B. 2000. “Xunzi on Moral Motivation.” See Kline and Ivanhoe 2000, 135–54.Google Scholar
  23. Xunzi 荀子. 1935. In The Collected Commentaries on the Xunzi 荀子集解. Edited by Wang Xianqian 王先謙. Taibei 台北: Shijie Shuju 世界書局.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations