Skip to main content
Log in

Drainage design combining drain holes and pinholes for tunnel boring machine segments subject to high water pressure

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Balance of the groundwater and ecology is crucial for controlled discharge. However, regarding the segments of tunnel boring machines (TBMs) under high water pressure, the stability of the lining structure is often reduced by excessive drain holes required to achieve this balance. The large discharge of pinholes can easily have severe consequences, such as the lowering of the groundwater table, drying of springs, and vegetation wilting. Thus, in this study, according to the fluid-structure coupling theory, a new drainage design for TBM segments was developed by considering a mountain tunnel subject to a high water pressure as a case study. The evolution characteristics, including the external water pressure of the lining, discharge volume of the segment, and groundwater-table drawdown, were investigated via numerical modeling with drain holes and pinholes. The results indicated that the optimal design parameters of drainage segments for the project case were as follows: a circumferential spacing angle and longitudinal number on one side of a single ring of 51° and 2, respectively, for the drain holes and an inclination angle and length of 46.41° and 0.25 times the grouting thickness, respectively, for the pin holes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu J, Liu D, Song K. Evaluation of the influence caused by tunnel construction on groundwater environment: A case study of tongluoshan tunnel, China. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015: 149265

  2. Wang G F, Wu Y X, Lu L H, Li G, Shen J S. Investigation of the geological and hydrogeological environment with relation to metro system construction in Jinan, China. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78(2): 1005–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen S, Peng H Y, Yang C, Chen B L, Chen L C. Investigation of the impacts of tunnel excavation on karst groundwater and dependent geo-environment using hydrological observation and numerical simulation: A case from karst anticline mountains of southeastern Sichuan Basin, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 28(30): 40203–40216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mossmark F, Annertz K K, Ericsson L O, Norin M. Hydrochemical impact of construction of the western section of the Hallandsås rail tunnel in Sweden. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2017, 76(2): 751–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng P, Zhao L H, Luo Z B, Li L, Li Q, Deng X, Peng W Q. Analytical solution for the limiting drainage of a mountain tunnel based on area-well theory. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu J Y, Ge S S, Hou L C, Zhang Y T, Liu Y Z. Limit drainage of separated tunnel based on ecological groundwater table: A case study. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021: 2669924

  7. Gokdemir C, Rubin Y, Li X J, Xu H. A vulnerability assessment method to evaluate the impact of tunnel drainage on terrestrial vegetation under various atmospheric and climatic conditions. Advances in Water Resources, 2021, 147: 103796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lv Y X, Jiang Y J, Hu W, Cao M, Mao Y. A review of the effects of tunnel excavation on the hydrology, ecology, and environment in karst areas: Current status, challenges, and perspectives. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 586: 124891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee S, Moon J S. Excessive groundwater inflow during TBM tunneling in limestone formation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96: 103217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aalianvari A, Katibeh H, Sharifzadeh M. Application of fuzzy Delphi AHP method for the estimation and classification of Ghomrud tunnel from groundwater flow hazard. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2012, 5(2): 275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gattinoni P, Scesi L. The groundwater rise in the urban area of Milan (Italy) and its interactions with underground structures and infrastructures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 62: 103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombo L, Gattinoni P, Scesi L. Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow for hazard assessment along the underground infrastructures in Milan (northern Italy). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79: 110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou Z, Zhang J J, Gong C J. Automatic detection method of tunnel lining multi-defects via an enhanced You Only Look Once v4 network. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2022, 37(6): 762–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng P, Zhao L H, Li L, Zou J F, Luo W. Limiting drainage criterion for groundwater of mountain tunnel. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(12): 4660–4668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu B, Wang Y X, Zhao G Z, Yang B, Wang R R, Huang D X, Xiang B. Intelligent decision method for main control parameters of tunnel boring machine based on multi-objective optimization of excavation efficiency and cost. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 116: 104054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Z H, Wang W Y, Lin P, Nie L C, Wu J, Li Z M. Hard-rock TBM jamming subject to adverse geological conditions: Influencing factor, hazard mode and a case study of Gaoligongshan Tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 108: 103683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shin H S, Youn D J, Chae S E, Shin J H. Effective control of pore water pressures on tunnel linings using pin-hole drain method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(5): 555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim D R, Kim H J, Shin J H. Performance evaluation of pin-holed pipe anchor for fractured zone in subsea tunnel. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2017, 35(6): 769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Z J, Zeng C P, Li H, Gao Y, Gong L, Li Y X, Liang H F, Zhang E Z. Optimal design of the seepage control for Xianglushan diversion tunnel under high external water pressure. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2022, 40(9): 4595–4615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan Q X, Ma T T, Chen F. Study of influence of water discharge volume on lining external loads for discharge segment lining. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(4): 1108–1112 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yan Q X, Cheng X, Zheng J, He C. Analysis on fluid-structure interaction of drainage segment lining under different drainage schemes. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2012, 34(6): 95–100 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yan Q X, Zhang M, Cheng X. Study of model test for water pressure distribution character behind drainage segment lining. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S1): 2617–2623 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qi C. Study on mechanical characteristics of segmental lining structure for deep-buried inclined shaft constructed by shield. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Afshani A, Li W, Oka S, Itoh Y, Akagi H. Study of the long-term behavior of segmented tunnels in cohesive soil based on the circumferential joint opening. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 120: 104210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. GB 50164-2011. Chinese Standard for Quality Control of Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture Publishing & Media Co., Ltd., 2011, 9–10

  26. Li P F, Wang F, Long Y Y, Zhao X. Investigation of steady water inflow into a subsea grouted tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 80: 92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li L Y, Yang J S, Wang L C, Wang S Y, Fang X H, Xie Y P. Cause analysis and treatment measures of the inverted arch heaving disease of a high-speed railway tunnel under heavy rainfall. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2021, 58(1): 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao T C, Han T R, Wu G, Gao Y, Lu Y. Effects of grouting in reducing excessive tunnel lining deformation: Field experiment and numerical modelling using material point method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 116: 104114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arnau O, Molins C. Theoretical and numerical analysis of the three-dimensional response of segmental tunnel linings subjected to localized loads. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 384–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang S C, Jiang X, Bai Y. The influence of hand hole on the ultimate strength and crack pattern of shield tunnel segment joints by scaled model test. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(5): 1200–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gong C J, Wang Y Y, Peng Y C, Ding W Q, Lei M F, Da Z, Shi C H. Three-dimensional coupled hydromechanical analysis of localized joint leakage in segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 130: 104726

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41972276), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2020J06013), and the “Foal Eagle Program” Youth Top-notch Talent Project of Fujian Province (No. 00387088). The financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Huang, M., Chen, Z. et al. Drainage design combining drain holes and pinholes for tunnel boring machine segments subject to high water pressure. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 1723–1738 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0948-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0948-z

Keywords

Navigation