Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteretic behavior of cambered surface steel tube damper: Theoretical and experimental research

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel cambered surface steel tube damper (CSTD) with a cambered surface steel tube and two concave connecting plates is proposed herein. The steel tube is the main energy dissipation component and comprises a weakened segment in the middle, a transition segment, and an embedded segment. It is believed that during an earthquake, the middle weakened segment of the CSTD will be damaged, whereas the reliability of the end connection is ensured. Theoretical and experimental studies are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed CSTD. Formulas for the initial stiffness and yield force of the CSTD are proposed. Subsequently, two CSTD specimens with different steel tube thicknesses are fabricated and tested under cyclic quasi-static loads. The result shows that the CSTD yields a stable hysteretic response and affords excellent energy dissipation. A parametric study is conducted to investigate the effects of the steel tube height, diameter, and thickness on the seismic performance of the CSTD. Compared with equal-stiffness design steel tube dampers, the CSTD exhibits better energy dissipation performance, more stable hysteretic response, and better uniformity in plastic deformation distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michalakis C C, Soong T T, Dargush G F. Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit. Buffalo: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  2. Soong T T, Spencer B F Jr. Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24(3): 243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chou C C, Chung P T, Wu T H, Beato A R O. Validation of a steel dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) for seismic resistance: From brace member to one-story one-bay braced frame tests. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Symans M D, Charney F A, Whittaker A S, Constantinou M C, Kircher C A, Johnson M W, McNamara R J. Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 134(1): 3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wada A, Qu Z, Motoyui S, Sakata H. Seismic retrofit of existing SRC frames using rocking walls and steel dampers. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2011, 5(3): 259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Javanmardi A, Ibrahim Z, Ghaedi K, Benisi Ghadim H, Hanif M U. State-of-the-art review of metallic dampers: Testing, development and implementation. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2020, 27(2): 455–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Javidan M M, Chun S, Kim J. Experimental study on steel hysteretic column dampers for seismic retrofit of structures. Steel and Composite Structures, 2021, 40(4): 495–509

    Google Scholar 

  8. Javidan M M, Ali A, Kim J. A steel hysteretic damper for seismic design and retrofit of precast portal frames. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 57: 104958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly J M, Skinner R I, Heine A J. Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1972, 5(3): 63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whittaker A S, Bertero V V, Thompson C L, Alonso L J. Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthquake Spectra, 1991, 7(4): 563–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shih M, Sung W, Go C. Investigation of newly developed added damping and stiffness device with low yield strength steel. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A, 2004, 5(3): 326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farzampour A, Eatherton M R. Parametric computational study on butterfly-shaped hysteretic dampers. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(5): 1214–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shih M H, Sung W P. A model for hysteretic behavior of rhombic low yield strength steel added damping and stiffness. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(12–13): 895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsai K C, Chen H W, Hong C P, Su Y F. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction. Earthquake Spectra, 1993, 9(3): 505–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu C, Study on energy dissipation and seismic mitigation performance of HADAS damper. Dissertation for the Master’s degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2008 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abebe D Y, Jeong S J, Getahune B M, Segu D Z, Choi J H. Hysteretic characteristics of shear panel damper made of low yield point steel. Materials Research Innovations, 2015, 19(S5): 902–910

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin X, Wu K, Skalomenos K A, Lu L, Zhao S. Development of a buckling-restrained shear panel damper with demountable steel-concrete composite restrainers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 118: 221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu H L, Halim H. Improving seismic performance of framed structures with steel curved dampers. Engineering Structures, 2017, 130: 99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clayton P M, Dowden D M, Li C H, Berman J W, Bruneau M, Lowes L N, Tsai K C. Self-centering steel plate shear walls for improving seismic resilience. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang C, Zhang Z, Zhang Q. Static and dynamic cyclic performance of a low-yield-strength steel shear panel damper. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 79: 195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu L Y, Nie X, Fan J S. Cyclic behaviour of low-yield-point steel shear panel dampers. Engineering Structures, 2016, 126: 391–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jain S, Rai D C, Sahoo D R. Postyield cyclic buckling criteria for aluminum shear panels. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2008, 75(2): 021015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. de Matteis G, Mazzolani F M, Panico S. Experimental tests on pure aluminium shear panels with welded stiffeners. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(6): 1734–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Matteis G, Brando G, Mazzolani F M. Hysteretic behaviour of bracing-type pure aluminium shear panels by experimental tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(10): 1143–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahoo D R, Singhal T, Taraithia S S, Saini A. Cyclic behavior of shear-and-flexural yielding metallic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 114: 247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Javidan M M, Nasab M S E, Kim J. Full-scale tests of two-story RC frames retrofitted with steel plate multi-slit dampers. Steel and Composite Structures, 2021, 39(5): 645–664

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chan R W, Albermani F. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(4): 1058–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tagawa H, Yamanishi T, Takaki A, Chan R W. Cyclic behavior of seesaw energy dissipation system with steel slit dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 117: 24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gandelli E, Chernyshov S, Distl J, Dubini P, Weber F, Taras A. Novel adaptive hysteretic damper for enhanced seismic protection of braced buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 141: 106522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maleki S, Bagheri S. Pipe damper, Part I: Experimental and analytical study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(8–9): 1088–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maleki S, Bagheri S. Pipe damper, Part II: Application to bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(8–9): 1096–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maleki S, Mahjoubi S. Dual-pipe damper. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 85: 81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maleki S, Mahjoubi S. Infilled-pipe damper. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 98: 45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo W, Wang X, Yu Y, Chen X, Li S, Fang W, Zeng C, Wang Y, Bu D. Experimental study of a steel damper with X-shaped welded pipe halves. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 170: 106087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo W, Chen X, Yu Y, Bu D, Li S, Fang W, Wang X, Zeng C, Wang Y. Development and seismic performance of bolted steel dampers with X-shaped pipe halves. Engineering Structures, 2021, 239: 112327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abebe D Y, Kim J W, Choi J H. Hysteresis characteristics of circular pipe steel damper using LYP225. In: Proceedings of the Steel Innovation Conference 2013. Auckland: Steel Construction New Zealand, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  37. Abebe D Y, Kim J W, Gwak G, Choi J H. Low-cycled hysteresis characteristics of circular hollow steel damper subjected to inelastic behavior. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2019, 19(1): 157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Park H Y, Kim J, Kuwahara S. Cyclic behavior of shear-type hysteretic dampers with different cross-sectional shapes. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 187: 106964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lai M H, Ho J C M. Effect of continuous spirals on uni-axial strength and ductility of CFST columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 104: 235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lai M H, Ho J C M. Axial strengthening of thin-walled concrete-filled-steel-tube columns by circular steel jackets. Thin-walled Structures, 2015, 97: 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lai M H, Ho J C M. Confinement effect of ring-confined concrete-filled-steel-tube columns under uni-axial load. Engineering Structures, 2014, 67: 123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lai M H, Ho J C M. A theoretical axial stress–strain model for circular concrete-filled-steel-tube columns. Engineering Structures, 2016, 125: 124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lai M H, Ho J C M. An analysis-based model for axially loaded circular CFST columns. Thin-walled Structures, 2017, 119: 770–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lai M H, Chen M T, Ren F M, Ho J C M. Uni-axial behavior of externally confined UHSCFST columns. Thin-walled Structures, 2019, 142: 19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lai M H, Song W, Ou X L, Chen M T, Wang Q, Ho J C M. A path dependent stress–strain model for concrete-filled-steel-tube column. Engineering Structures, 2020, 211: 110312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. GB/T 8162-2018. Seamless Steel Tubes for Structural Purposes. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2018 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lai M H, Wu K J, Ou X L, Zeng M R, Li C W, Ho J C M. Effect of concrete wet packing density on the uni-axial strength of manufactured sand CFST columns. Structural Concrete, 2022, 23(4): 2615–2629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ho J C M, Ou X L, Li C W, Song W, Wang Q, Lai M H. Uni-axial behaviour of expansive CFST and DSCFST stub columns. Engineering Structures, 2021, 237: 112193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lai M H, Li C W, Ho J C M, Chen M T. Experimental investigation on hollow-steel-tube columns with external confinements. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 166: 105865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ren F M, Liang Y W, Ho J C M, Lai M H. Behaviour of FRP tube-concrete-encased steel composite columns. Composite Structures, 2020, 241: 112139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. JGJ 297-2013. Technical Specification for Seismic Energy Dissipation of Buildings. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2013 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  52. JGJ/T 101-2015. Specification for Seismic Test of Buildings. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2015 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guan M, Liu W, Lai M H, Du H, Cui J, Gan Y. Seismic behavior of innovative composite walls with high-strength manufactured sand concrete. Engineering Structures, 2019, 195: 182–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kalnins A, Rudolph J, Willuweit A. Using the nonlinear kinematic hardening material model of Chaboche for elastic–plastic ratcheting analysis. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2015, 137(3): 031006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Koo S, Han J, Marimuthu K P, Lee H. Determination of Chaboche combined hardening parameters with dual backstress for ratcheting evaluation of AISI 52100 bearing steel. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 122: 152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Jiangsu Rongda Shock Absorption Technology Co., Ltd., for fabricating the specimens and providing support. This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0703600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhou, Y., He, Z. et al. Hysteretic behavior of cambered surface steel tube damper: Theoretical and experimental research. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 606–624 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0925-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0925-6

Keywords

Navigation