Skip to main content
Log in

Damage-constitutive model for seawater coral concrete using different stirrup confinements subjected to axial loading

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the application of detrital coral as an alternative to natural aggregates in marine structures has attracted increased attention. In this study, research on the compressive performance of coral aggregate concrete (CAC) confined using steel stirrups with anti-rust treatment was experimentally conducted. A total of 45 specimens were cast, including 9 specimens without stirrups and under different strength grades (C20, C30, and C40) and 36 specimens under different strength grades (C20, C30, and C40). Moreover, three stirrup levels (rectangular, diamond-shaped compound, and spiral stirrups) and different stirrup spacings (40, 50, 60, and 70 mm) were used. Subsequently, the stress-strain curves of specimens subjected to axial loading were measured. The effects of the stirrup spacing and stirrup configurations on the stress and strain were investigated, respectively, and the lateral effective stress of the different stirrups was calculated based on the cohesive-elastic ring model and modified elastic beam theory. Moreover, a damage-constitutive model of CAC considering the lateral stress was set up based on damage mechanics theory. The results indicated an increase in the stress and strain with a decrease in the stirrup spacing, and the adopted stirrup ratio had a better strengthening effect than the different concrete grades, and the variation in the deformation was restricted by the performance of coral coarse aggregate (CA). However, an increment in the lateral strain was observed with an increase in the axial strain. The lateral stress model showed a good agreement with the experimental data, and the proposed damage-constitutive model had a good correlation with the measured stress-strain curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mezza-Garcia N. The floating island project: Self-organizing complexity. Proceedings, 2017, 1(3): 173

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howdyshell P A. The Use of Coral as an Aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete Structures. Champaign IL: Construction Engineering Research Lab, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dempsey J G. Coral and salt water as concrete materials. Journal Proceedings, 1951, 48(10): 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  4. Narver D L. Good concrete made with coral and sea water. Civil Engineering, 1954, 24(11): 49–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lorman W R. Characteristics of Coral Aggregates from Selected Locations in the Pacific Ocean Area. Port Hueneme, CA: Naval Civil Engineering Lab, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vines F. Experience with use of coral detritus as concrete aggregate in Western Samoa. Australian Road Research, 1982, 12(1): 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arumugam R A, Ramamurthy K. Study of compressive strength characteristics of coral aggregate concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1996, 48(3): 141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ootani H, Ohoka T, Tobisaka M. Properties of coral aggregate and coral concrete in Miyakojima. In: Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  9. Da B, Yu H, Ma H, Tan Y, Mi R, Dou X. Experimental investigation of whole stress-strain curves of coral concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 122: 81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fam A, Greene R, Rizkalla S. Field applications of concrete-filled FRP tubes for marine piles. In: Rizkalla S, Nanni A, eds. Field Applications of FRP Reinforcement: Case Studies. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2003, 161–180

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu T, Hu Y M, Teng J G. Cyclic lateral response of FRP-confined circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 124: 12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tobbi H, Farghaly A S, Benmokrane B. Strength model for concrete columns reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars and ties. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111(4): 789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahman H, Kingsley C, Crimi J. An FRP grid for bridge deck reinforcement. In: Marketing Technical Regulatory Sessions of the Composites Institutes International Composites Expo, Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.: Society of the Plastics Industry, 1997, 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khan Q S, Sheikh M N, Hadi M N S. Experimental results of circular FRP tube confined concrete (CFFT) and comparison with analytical models. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 29: 101157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Wei Y, Bai J, Zhang Y. Stress-strain model of an FRP-confined concrete filled steel tube under axial compression. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 142: 149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwan A K H, Dong C X, Ho J C M. Axial and lateral stress–strain model for FRP confined concrete. Engineering Structures, 2015, 99: 285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao Y, Li L, Liu M, Wu Y. Mechanical behavior of FRP confined rubber concrete under monotonic and cyclic loading. Composite Structures, 2021, 272: 114205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J, Feng P, Hao T, Yue Q. Axial compressive behavior of seawater coral aggregate concrete-filled FRP tubes. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 147: 272–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y L, Zhao X L, Singh R K R, Al-Saadi S. Experimental study on seawater and sea sand concrete filled GFRP and stainless steel tubular stub columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 106: 390–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam L, Teng J G. Stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete under cyclic axial compression. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(2): 308–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Wei Y, Bai J, Wu G, Dong Z. A novel seawater and sea sand concrete filled FRP-carbon steel composite tube column: Concept and behaviour. Composite Structures, 2020, 246: 112421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deng X-F, Liang S-L, Fu F, Qian K. Effects of high-strength concrete on progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete frame. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(6): 04020078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qian K, Liang S L, Xiong X Y, Fu F, Fang Q. Quasi-static and dynamic behavior of precast concrete frames with high performance dry connections subjected to loss of a penultimate column scenario. Engineering Structures, 2020, 205: 110115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weng Y H, Qian K, Fu F, Fang Q. Numerical investigation on load redistribution capacity of flat slab substructures to resist progressive collapse. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 29: 101109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bousalem B, Chikh N. Development of a confined model for rectangular ordinary reinforced concrete columns. Materials and Structures, 2007, 40(6): 605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Assa B, Nishiyama M, Watanabe F. New approach for modeling confined concrete. II: Rectangular columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(7): 751–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ren X, Liu K, Li J, Gao X. Compressive behavior of stirrup-confined concrete under dynamic loading. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 154: 10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Dash K M, Ramadan M O. Effect of aggregate on the performance of confined concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36(3): 599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saatcioglu M, Razvi S R. Strength and ductility of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1992, 118(6): 1590–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. JGJ55-2011. Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Perss, 2011 (in Chinese)

  31. Basset R, Uzumeri S M. Effect of confinement on the behaviour of high-strength lightweight concrete columns. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1986, 13(6): 741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cusson D, Paultre P. Stress-strain model for confined high-strength concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1995, 121(3): 468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Afifi M Z, Mohamed H M, Chaallal O, Benmokrane B. Confinement model for concrete columns internally confined with carbon FRP spirals and hoops. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(9): 04014219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baduge S, Mendis P, Ngo T. Stress-strain relationship for very-high strength concrete (>100MPa) confined by lateral reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 2018, 177: 795–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Campione G, Cannella F, Minafò G. A simple model for the calculation of the axial load-carrying capacity of corroded RC columns. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(5): 1935–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Légeron F, Paultre P. Uniaxial confinement model for normal- and high-strength concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(2): 241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Timoshenko S P, Goodier J N, Abramson H N. Theory of Elasticity. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill, 1970

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Campione G. Analytical model for high-strength concrete columns with square cross-section. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2008, 28(3): 295–316

  39. Mander J B, Priestley M J N, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Braga F, Gigliotti R, Laterza M. Analytical stress–strain relationship for concrete confined by steel stirrups and/or FRP jackets. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132(9): 1402–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. West J, Ibrahim A, Hindi R. Analytical compressive stress-strain model for high-strength concrete confined with cross-spirals. Engineering Structures, 2016, 113: 362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Campione G, Fossetti M, Minafò; G, Papia M. Influence of steel reinforcements on the behavior of compressed high strength R. C. circular columns. Engineering Structures, 2012, 34: 371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cui T, He H, Yan W, Zhou D. Compression damage constitutive model of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete and its experimental verification. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 264: 120026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou W, Feng P, Lin H. Constitutive relations of coral aggregate concrete under uniaxial and triaxial compression. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 251: 118957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Willam K J, Warnke E P. Constitutive model for the triaxial behaviour of concrete. In: Proceedings of The International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, London. Zurich: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 1975, 1–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51868005) and the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (No. YCBZ2022010). Their sponsorships are sincerely appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haifeng Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Yang, H., Deng, Z. et al. Damage-constitutive model for seawater coral concrete using different stirrup confinements subjected to axial loading. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 429–447 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0913-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0913-2

Keywords

Navigation