Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance assessment of Alccofine with silica fume, fly ash and slag for development of high strength mortar

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies on concrete have identified silica fume (SF) as the most effective supplementary material, whereas fly ash (FA) and slag have been identified as economical materials with long term strength potential. Development of blended cement mortar referred to as blended mortar (BM) requires similar assessment. The present study explores the application of Alccofine (AL) as supplementary material and compares its performance with conventional materials namely SF, FA and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). The mortar specimens with binder to fine-aggregates (b/f) ratio of 1:2 are prepared at water to binder (w/b) ratios of 0.4 and 0.35. The strength values and stress-strain curve for control and BM specimens are obtained at 7, 28, 56, and 90 d curing periods. The assessment based on strength activity index, k-value method and strength estimation model confirms that AL, despite lower pozzolanic activity, contributes to strength gain, due to reduced dilution effect. Assessment of stress-strain curves suggests that the effect of w/b ratio is more dominant on the elastic modulus of BM specimens than on control specimens. The observations from the study identify enhanced strength gain, improved elastic modulus and higher energy absorption as key contributions of AL making it a potential supplementary material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yazıcı H, Yiğiter H, Karabulut A Ş, Baradan B. Utilization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag as an alternative silica source in reactive powder concrete. Fuel, 2008, 87(12): 2401–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siddique R. Utilization (recycling) of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in concrete: Strength and durability properties. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2014, 16(3): 460–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siddique R. Utilization of silica fume in concrete: Review of hardened properties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2011, 55(11): 923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papadakis V, Tsimas S. Supplementary cementing materials in concrete Part I: Efficiency and design. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(10): 1525–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Papadakis V, Antiohos S, Tsimas S. Supplementary cementing materials in concrete Part II: A fundamental estimation of the efficiency factor. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(10): 1533–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane D S. Performance of slag cement in hydraulic cement concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 2290(1): 84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sisomphon K. A chemical analysis method for determining blastfurnace slag content in hardened concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2009, 23(1): 54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas M D A, Osborne G J, Matthewst J D, Cripwell J B. A comparison of the properties of OPC, PFA and GGBS concretes in reinforced concrete tank walls of slender section. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1990, 42(152): 127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oner A, Akyuz S, Yildiz R. An experimental study on strength development of concrete containing fly ash and optimum usage of fly ash in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(6): 1165–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poon C S, Kou S C, Lam L. Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2006, 20(10): 858–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang M, Tam C, Leow M. Effect of water-to-cementitious materials ratio and silica fume on the autogenous shrinkage of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(10): 1687–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Güneyisi E, Gesoğlu M, Karaoğlu S, Mermerdaş K. Strength, permeability and shrinkage cracking of silica fume and metakaolin concretes. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 34: 120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland R B, Kurtis K E, Kahn L F. Effect of different concrete materials on the corrosion of the embedded reinforcing steel. Corrosion of Steel in Concrete Structures, 2016: 131–147

  14. Bhanja S, Sengupta B. Modified water-cement ratio law for silica fume concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(3): 447–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duval R, Kadri E H. Influence of silica fume on the workability and the compressive strength of high-performance concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 1998, 28(4): 533–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdul Razak H, Wong H S. Strength estimation model for high-strength concrete incorporating metakaolin and silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(4): 688–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazloom M, Ramezanianpour A A, Brooks J J. Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004, 26(4): 347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poon C S, Lam L, Kou S, Wong Y L, Wong R. Rate of pozzolanic reaction of metakaolin in high-performance cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(9): 1301–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khedr S A, Abou-Zeid M N. Characteristics of silica-fume concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1994, 6(3): 357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chalee W, Jaturapitakkul C. Effects of W/B ratios and fly ash finenesses on chloride diffusion coefficient of concrete in marine environment. Materials and Structures, 2009, 42(4): 505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding J T, Li Z. Effects of metakaolin and silica fume on properties of concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 2002, 99: 393–398

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghahari S, Assi L, Alsalman A, Alyamaç K. Fracture properties evaluation of cellulose nanocrystals cement paste. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(11): 2507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bangalore Chinnappa G, Karra R C. Experimental and statistical evaluations of strength properties of concrete with iron ore tailings as fine aggregate. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 2020, 24(1): 04019038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alcolab (India) Pvt. Ltd. Indian Patent, 297735

  25. Sagar B, Sivakumar M V N. Mechanical and microstructure characterization of alccofine based high strength concrete. Silicon, 2021: 1–19

  26. Kunther W, Ferreiro S, Skibsted J. Influence of the Ca/Si ratio on the compressive strength of cementitious calcium-silicate-hydrate binders. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(33): 17401–17412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parveen D, Singhal D, Junaid M T, Jindal B B, Mehta A. Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating alccofine at ambient curing. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 180: 298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use. ASTM C 618-01. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith I A. The Design of fly-ash concretes. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1967, 36(4): 769–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garg N, Wang K. Estimating efficiency of fly ashes: An alternative definition of k values. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2015, 4(1): 25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J, Zhao Y. The mechanical properties and microstructure of ultra-high-performance concrete containing various supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2017, 6(4): 254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ganesh Babu K, Surya Prakash P V. Efficiency of silica fume in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25(6): 1273–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Babu K G, Nageswara Rao G S. Efficiency of fly ash in concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1993, 15(4): 223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Razak H A, Wong H S. Strength estimation model for high-strength concrete incorporating metakaolin and silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(4): 688–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rao G A. Investigations on the performance of silica fume-incorporated cement pastes and mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(11): 1765–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Megat Johari M A, Brooks J J, Kabir S, Rivard P. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on engineering properties of high strength concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(5): 2639–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meng W, Valipour M, Khayat K H. Optimization and performance of cost-effective ultra-high performance concrete. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50(1): 29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi C, Wu Z, Xiao J, Wang D, Huang Z, Fang Z. A review on ultra high performance concrete: Part I. Raw materials and mixture design. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 101: 741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Siddika A, Al Mamun M A, Ferdous W, Saha A K. R. Alyousef, 3D-printed concrete: Applications, performance, and challenges. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2020, 9: 127–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Güllü H, Canakci H, Al Zangana I F. Use of cement based grout with glass powder for deep mixing. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 137: 12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Joshaghani A, Moeini M A, Balapour M, Moazenian A. Effects of supplementary cementitious materials on mechanical and durability properties of high-performance non-shrinking grout (HPNSG). Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2018, 7(1): 38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. IS 12269. Indian Standard Ordinary Portland Cement, 53 Grade—Specification (First Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  43. ASTM. Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM C150/C150M-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton R D. Supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(12): 1244–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Garg N, Wang K. Comparing the performance of different commercial clays in fly ash-modified mortars. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2012, 1(3): 111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. IS 383. Indian Standard Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete—Specification (Third Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  47. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates. ASTM C136/C136M-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  48. IS 4031 Part VI. Indian Standard Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement. Part VI—Determination of Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement other than Masonry Cement (First Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 1

    Google Scholar 

  49. EN-450-1. Fly Ash For Concrete. Definition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. London: British Standards Institute, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schiessl P, Hardtl R. Efficiency of Fly Ash in Concrete Evaluation of ibac Test Results. Technical Report of Institut für Bauforschung, 1991

  51. Pekmezci B Y, Akyüz S. Optimum usage of a natural pozzolan for the maximum compressive strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(12): 2175–2179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ganesh Babu K, Sree Rama Kumar V. Efficiency of GGBS in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(7): 1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gruyaert E, Maes M, de Belie N. Performance of BFS concrete: k-value concept versus equivalent performance concept. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 47: 441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. IS 4031 Part IV. Indian Standard Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement. Part IV—Determination of Consistency of Standard Cement Paste. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 1

    Google Scholar 

  55. IS 4031 Part V. Indian Standard Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement. Part V—Determination of Initial and Final Setting Times. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 1

    Google Scholar 

  56. ASTM. Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle. ASTM C-191-08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brooks J J, Johari M A M, Mazloom M. Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2003, 25: 161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Counto Microfine Products Private Limited for supplying the Alccofine and Mr. Mohammed Tabish Anwer, Senior Concrete Technologist, Fosroc India Private Limited for providing chemical admixtures used in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Institute of Infrastructure, Technology, Research and Management (IITRAM), Ahmedabad, 380026, India

    Shivang D. Jayswal & Mahesh Mungule

Authors
  1. Shivang D. Jayswal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahesh Mungule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahesh Mungule.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayswal, S.D., Mungule, M. Performance assessment of Alccofine with silica fume, fly ash and slag for development of high strength mortar. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 576–588 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0826-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0826-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation