Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Topology optimization and seismic collapse assessment of shape memory alloy (SMA)-braced frames: Effectiveness of Fe-based SMAs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a seismic topology optimization study of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy (SMA) braces. Optimal SMA-braced frames (SMA-BFs) with either Fe-based SMA or NiTi braces are determined in a performance-based seismic design context. The topology optimization is performed on 5- and 10-story SMA-BFs considering the placement, length, and cross-sectional area of SMA bracing members. Geometric, strength, and performance-based design constraints are considered in the optimization. The seismic response and collapse safety of topologically optimal SMA-BFs are assessed according to the FEMA P695 methodology. A comparative study on the optimal SMA-BFs is also presented in terms of total relative cost, collapse capacity, and peak and residual story drift. The results demonstrate that Fe-based SMA-BFs exhibit higher collapse capacity and more uniform distribution of lateral displacement over the frame height while being more cost-effective than NiTi braced frames. In addition to a lower unit price compared to NiTi, Fe-based SMAs reduce SMA material usage. In frames with Fe-based SMA braces, the SMA usage is reduced by up to 80%. The results highlight the need for using SMAs with larger recoverable strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auricchio F, Fugazza D, DesRoches R. Earthquake performance of steel frames with nitinol braces. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 10(Suppl1): 45–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCormick J, DesRoches R, Fugazza D, Auricchio F. Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(6): 862–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu C, Zhu S. Shake table test and numerical study of self-centering steel frame with SMA braces. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(1): 117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asgarian B, Moradi S. Seismic response of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(1): 65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller D J, Fahnestock L A, Eatherton M R. Development and experimental validation of a nickel—titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace. Engineering Structures, 2012, 40: 288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eatherton M R, Fahnestock L A, Miller D J. Computational study of self-centering buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43(13): 1897–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu J W, Choi E. Seismic design, nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluation of recentering buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs). International Journal of Steel Structures, 2014, 14(4): 683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qiu C, Li H, Ji K, Hou H, Tian L. Performance-based plastic design approach for multi-story self-centering concentrically braced frames using SMA braces. Engineering Structures, 2017, 153: 628–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu C X, Zhu S. Performance-based seismic design of self-centering steel frames with SMA-based braces. Engineering Structures, 2017, 130: 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu C, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Hou H. Robustness of performance-based plastic design method for SMABFs. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2019, 19(3): 787–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alaneme K K, Okotete E A, Anaele J U. Structural vibration mitigation—A concise review of the capabilities and applications of Cu and Fe based shape memory alloys in civil structures. Journal of Building Engineering, 2019, 22: 22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alaneme K K, Okotete E A. Reconciling viability and cost-effective shape memory alloy options—A review of copper and iron based shape memory metallic systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2016, 19(3): 1582–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang C, Wang W, Ji Y, Yam M C H. Superior low-cycle fatigue performance of iron-based SMA for seismic damping application. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 184: 106817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou H, Li H, Qiu C, Zhang Y. Effect of hysteretic properties of SMAs on seismic behavior of self-centering concentrically braced frames. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2018, 25(3): e2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang W, Fang C, Shen D, Zhang R, Ding J, Wu H. Performance assessment of disc spring-based self-centering braces for seismic hazard mitigation. Engineering Structures, 2021, 242: 112527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fang C, Ping Y, Chen Y, Yam M C H, Chen J, Wang W. Seismic performance of self-centering steel frames with SMA-viscoelastic hybrid braces. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2020: 1–28

  17. Fang C, Ping Y, Zheng Y, Chen Y. Probabilistic economic seismic loss estimation of steel braced frames incorporating emerging self-centering technologies. Engineering Structures, 2021, 241: 112486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozbulut O E, Roschke P N, Lin P Y, Loh C H. GA-based optimum design of a shape memory alloy device for seismic response mitigation. Smart Materials and Structures, 2010, 19(6): 065004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu M, Burns S A, Wen Y K. Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(3): 289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaveh A, Farahmand Azar B, Hadidi A, Rezazadeh Sorochi F, Talatahari S. Performance-based seismic design of steel frames using ant colony optimization. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(4): 566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fragiadakis M, Lagaros N D, Papadrakakis M. Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006, 32(1): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang Q Q, Xie Y M, Steven G P. Optimal topology design of bracing systems for multistory steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126(7): 823–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stromberg L L, Beghini A, Baker W F, Paulino G H. Application of layout and topology optimization using pattern gradation for the conceptual design of buildings. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(2): 165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bobby S, Spence S M J, Kareem A. Data-driven performance-based topology optimization of uncertain wind-excited tall buildings. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(6): 1379–1402

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Gholizadeh S, Poorhoseini H. Seismic layout optimization of steel braced frames by an improved dolphin echolocation algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(4): 1011–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hassanzadeh A, Gholizadeh S. Collapse-performance-aided design optimization of steel concentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures, 2019, 197: 109411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsiao P C, Lehman D E, Roeder C W. Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2013, 42(10): 1547–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moradi S, Alam M S, Asgarian B. Incremental dynamic analysis of steel frames equipped with NiTi shape memory alloy braces. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2014, 23(18): 1406–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi F, Ozbulut O E, Zhou Y. Influence of shape memory alloy brace design parameters on seismic performance of self-centering steel frame buildings. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2020, 27(1): e2462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gholizadeh S, Ebadijalal M. Performance based discrete topology optimization of steel braced frames by a new metaheuristic. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 123: 77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gholizadeh S, Hassanzadeh A, Milany A, Ghatte H F. On the seismic collapse capacity of optimally designed steel braced frames. Engineering with Computers, 2020: 1–13

  33. FEMA-P695. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  34. ASCE 41-13. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. McKenna F, Fenves G L. OpenSees: The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Berkeley, CA: Regents of the University of California, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  36. Math Works Inc. MATLAB, The Language of Technical Computing. 2019

  37. DesRoches R, McCormick J, Delemont M. Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(1): 38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tanaka Y, Himuro Y, Kainuma R, Sutou Y, Omori T, Ishida K. Ferrous polycrystalline shape-memory alloy showing huge superelasticity. Science, 2010, 327(5972): 1488–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fugazza D. Use of shape-memory alloy devices in earthquake engineering: Mechanical properties, advanced constitutive modeling and structural applications. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pavia: University of Pavia, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  40. Qiu C, Du X. Seismic performance of multistory CBFs with novel recentering energy dissipative braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 168: 105864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pham H. Performance-based assessments of buckling-restrained braced steel frames retrofitted by self-centering shape memory alloy braces. In: Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations. Athens, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beiraghi H, Zhou H. Dual-steel frame consisting of moment-resisting frame and shape memory alloy braces subjected to near-field earthquakes. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2020, 29: e1784

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper was financially supported by the Ryerson University Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through Discovery Grant. The authors gratefully acknowledge these financial supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, M5B 2K3, Canada

    Aydin Hassanzadeh & Saber Moradi

Authors
  1. Aydin Hassanzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saber Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saber Moradi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassanzadeh, A., Moradi, S. Topology optimization and seismic collapse assessment of shape memory alloy (SMA)-braced frames: Effectiveness of Fe-based SMAs. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 281–301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0807-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0807-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation