Skip to main content
Log in

Classification and quantification of excavated soil and construction sludge: A case study in Wenzhou, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With rapid urbanization in China, a large amount of excavated soil and construction sludge is being generated from geotechnical and underground engineering. For sustainable management of these construction wastes, it is essential to quantify their production first. The present study has attempted to classify the excavated soil and construction sludge according to their composition and geotechnical properties (particle size, water content, plasticity index). Based on these classifications, a new approach was proposed to quantify the production. The said approach was based on multi-source information, such as the urban topographic map, geological survey reports, urban master plan, and remote sensing images. A case study in Wenzhou city of China was also pursued to illustrate the validity of the newly developed approach. The research showed that in 2021–2025, the total excavated soils and construction sludge production in Wenzhou would reach 107.5 × 106 and 81.7 × 106 m3, respectively. Furthermore, the excavated soil was classified into the miscellaneous fill, crust clay, muddy clay and mud with silty sand. Likewise, the construction sludge was classified as liquid sludge and paste-like sludge. The classification and quantification can serve as guidance for disposal and recycling, thereby leading to high-level management of waste disposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang N, Duan H, Sun P, Li J, Zuo J, Mao R C, Liu G, Niu Y N. Characterizing the generation and environmental impacts of subway-related excavated soil and rock in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 248: 119242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Characterization of Building-related Construction and Demolition Debris in the United States. Report No. EPA530-R-98-010. 1998

  3. WRAP. Guidelines for Measuring and Reporting Construction, Demolition and Excavation Waste. 2010

  4. Katsumi T. Soil excavation and reclamation in civil engineering: Environmental aspects. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2015, 61(Supp. 1): 22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamon M, Katsumi T, Imanishi H. Utilization system of waste slurry from construction works. Bulletin of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, 1993, 43(4): 73–89

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kupusamy K, Nagapan S, Abdullah A H, Kaliannan S, Maniam H. Construction waste estimation analysis in residential projects of Malaysia. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 2019, 9(5): 4842–4845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiao L, Liu D D, Yuan X, Wang Q, Ma Q. Generation and prediction of construction and demolition waste using exponential smoothing method: A case study of Shandong province, China. Sustainability, 2020, 12(12): 5094–5105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu W S, Lou J F, Webster C, Xue F, Bao Z K, Chi B. Estimating construction waste generation in the Greater Bay Area, China using machine learning. Waste Management, 2021, 134(10): 78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cochran K, Townsend T, Reinhart D, Heck H. Estimation of regional building-related C&D debris generation and composition: Case study for Florida, US. Waste Management, 2007, 27(7): 921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Llatas C. A model for quantifying construction waste in projects according to the European waste list. Waste Management, 2011, 31(6): 1261–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Ding Z, Mi X, Wang J. A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2013, 74(5): 20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding Z K, Liu R S, Wang Y F, Tam V W, Ma M X. An agent-based model approach for urban demolition waste quantification and a management framework for stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 285(2): 124897

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang S L, Hsu W L. Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 63(2): 61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosado L, Niza S, Ferrão P. A material flow accounting case study of the Lisbon metropolitan area using the urban metabolism analyst model. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2014, 18(1): 84–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo D M, Huang L Z. The state of the art of material flow analysis research based on construction and demolition waste recycling and disposal. Buildings, 2019, 9(10): 207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao X F, Nakatani J, Zhang Q, Huang B J, Wang T, Moriguchi Y. Dynamic material flow and stock analysis of residential buildings by integrating rural-urban land transition: A case of Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253(4): 119941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu H, Wang J, Duan H, Ouyang L, Huang W, Zuo J. An innovative approach to managing demolition waste via GIS (geographic information system): A case study in Shenzhen city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamon M, Katsumi T, Imanishi H. Utilization of waste slurry from construction works. Bulletin of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, 1993, 43(4): 73–89

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamon M, Katsumi T, Inui T. Dehydration-solidification treatment and geotechnical utilization of waste sludge from construction works. Environmental Geotechnics, 1998: 603–608

  20. Kamon M, Inazumi S, Rajasekaran G, Katsumi T. Evaluation of waste sludge compatibility for landfill cover application. Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society Soils & Foundation, 2002, 42(4): 13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsumi T, Kamon M, Inui T. Japanese status on the use of waste and by-products in geotechnical applications. recycled materials in geotechnics. Sessions at ASCE Civil Engineering Conference & Exposition, 2005: 22–41

  22. Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. Ministerial Ordinance for Determining the Standards of Judgment Concerning the Use of Recycled Resources for Persons Engaged in Construction Business. 2001 (in Japanese)

  23. Mori M, Takahashi H, Ousaka A, Horii K, Kataoka I, Ishii T, Kotani K. A proposal for a new recycling system for high-water content muds by using paper debris and polymer and strength property of recycled soils. Journal of the Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan, 2003, 119(4): 155–160

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takahashi H. State-of-the-art and future problems of countermeasures for excavated soils discharged from excavation construction. Micro-Tunneling Technology, 2006, 20(4): 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamazaki J, Takahashi H, Kanari H, Mori M. An experimental study on production of planting soil from the viewpoint of soil physical properties. Journal of the Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan, 2008, 124(12): 818–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gulsen F, Inui T, Kato T, Takai A, Katsumi T. Numerical investigation on utilization of natural contaminated soil in the embankments. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 466–473

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meda S R, Sharma S K, Tyagi G D. Utilization of waste sludge as a construction material—A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 46(9): 4195–4202

    Google Scholar 

  28. Murakami O, Masuda T, Hanada O, Tamura T, Kamao S. Recycling and treatment of construction sludge. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2012, 155: 1129–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi H. Topical Themes in Energy and Resources. Tokyo: Springer, 2015: 177–194

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Magnusson S, Lundberg K, Svedberg B, Knutsson S. Sustainable management of excavated soil and rock in urban areas—A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 93(4): 18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamana M, Tomizawa Y, Fujiwara T, Mizuta K, Mizuno K, Inui T, Katsumi T, Kamon M. Management of the Soils Discharged from Shield Tunnel Excavation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 374–381

    Google Scholar 

  32. Katsumi T, Inui T, Yasutaka T, Takai A. Towards sustainable soil management—Reuse of excavated soils with natural contamination. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 99–118

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wenzhou Planning and Natural Resources Bureau. Master Plan of Wenzhou City (2021–2025). 2017 (in Chinese)

  34. Wenzhou Planning and Natural Resources Bureau. Master Plan of Wenzhou City (2016–2020). 2012 (in Chinese)

  35. Wenzhou Municipal People’s Government. Notice of the Office of Wenzhou Municipal People’s Government on Printing and Distributing the Three Year Action Plan for Major Construction Projects in Wenzhou (2016–2018). 2016 (in Chinese)

  36. Wenzhou Municipal People’s Government. Short Term Construction Planning of Wenzhou Urban Rail Transit (2020–2026). 2019 (in Chinese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Key Research and Development Program (No. 2019C03107) and China National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2018YFC1802300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangtong Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Q., Zhan, L., Shen, Y. et al. Classification and quantification of excavated soil and construction sludge: A case study in Wenzhou, China. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 202–213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0795-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0795-8

Keywords

Navigation