Skip to main content
Log in

On subsurface box-shaped lined tunnel under incident SH-wave propagation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a half-plane time-domain boundary element method is applied to obtain the seismic ground response, including a subsurface box-shaped lined tunnel deployed in a linear homogenous elastic medium exposed to obliquely incident SH-waves. Only the boundary around the tunnel is required to be discretized. To prepare an appropriate model by quadratic elements, a double-node procedure is used to receive dual boundary fields at corners as well as change the direction of the normal vector. After encoding the method in a previously confirmed computer program, a numerical study is carried out to sensitize some effective parameters, including frequency content and incident wave angle for obtaining a surface response. The depth and impedance ratio of the lining are assumed to be unvaried. The responses are illustrated in the time and frequency domains as two/three-dimensional graphs. The results showed that subsurface openings with sharp corners distorted the propagation path of the anti-plane waves to achieve the critical states on the ground surface. The present approach can be proposed to civil engineers for preparing simple underground box-shaped models with angular boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sgarlato G, Lombardo G, Rigano R. Evaluation of seismic site response nearby underground cavities using earthquake and ambient noise recordings: A case study in Catania area, Italy. Engineering Geology, 2011, 122(3–4): 281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kazemeini M J, Haghshenas E, Kamalian M. Experimental evaluation of seismic site response nearby underground cavities (study of subway tunnel in city of Karaj, Iran). Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Transaction of Civil Engineering, 2015, 39: 319–332

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sánchez-Sesma F J, Palencia V J, Luzón F. Estimation of local site effects during earthquakes: An overview. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 2002, 39(3): 167–193

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asano S. Reflection and refraction of elastic waves at a corrugated boundary surface. Part I, The case of incidence of SH-wave. Bulletin Earthquake Research Institute, 1960, 38: 177–197

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Datta S K. Diffraction of SH-waves by an elliptic elastic cylinder. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1974, 10(1): 123–133

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gamer U. Dynamic stress concentration in an elastic half space with a semi-circular cavity excited by SH-waves. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1977, 13(7): 675–681

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee V W, Trifunac M D. Response of tunnels to incident SH-waves. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1979, 105(4): 643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y L. The analysis of elastic liner in a cylindrical tunnel subjected to SH-waves. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1980, 3(1): 21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Datta S K, Shah A H. Scattering of SH-waves by embedded cavities. Wave Motion, 1982, 4(3): 265–283

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee V W, Manoogian M E. Surface motion above an arbitrary shape underground cavity for incident SH-waves. Europ Earthquake Engineering, 1995, 8(1): 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shi S, Han F, Wang Z, Liu D. The interaction of plane SH-waves and non-circular cavity surfaced with lining in anisotropic media. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1996, 17(9): 855–867

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Manoogian M E. Scattering and diffraction of SH-waves above an arbitrarily shaped tunnel. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 2000, 37(1–3): 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang L F, Zhou X L, Wang J H. Scattering of a plane wave by a lined cylindrical cavity in a poroelastic half-space. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(5): 773–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang J, Luo H, Lee V W. Diffraction of plane SH-waves by a semicircular cavity in half-space. Earth Science, 2010, 23(1): 5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi C, Zhang P, Johansson D, Nyberg U. Dynamic analysis for a circular lined tunnel with an imperfectly bonded interface impacted by plane SH-waves. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress-Tunnels for a better Life. Foz do Iguaçu: World Tunnel Congress, 2014

  16. Amornwongpaibun A, Luo H, Lee V W. Scattering of anti-plane SH-waves by a shallow semi-elliptical hill with a concentric elliptical tunnel. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 20(3): 363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kara H F. Diffraction of plane SH-wave by a cylindrical cavity in an infinite wedge. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 161: 1601–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao Y, Dai D, Zhang N, Wu Y, Mahfouz A H. Scattering of plane and cylindrical SH-waves by a horseshoe shaped cavity. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2016, 10(2): 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang G, Liu D. Scattering of SH-wave by multiple circular cavities in half space. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2002, 1(1): 36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi W P, Liu D K, Song Y T, Chu J L, Hu A Q. Scattering of circular cavity in right-angle planar space to steady SH-wave. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2006, 27(12): 1619–1626

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee V W, Manoogian M E, Chen S. Anti-plane SH-deformations near a surface rigid foundation above a subsurface rigid circular tunnel. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2002, 1(1): 27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smerzini C, Aviles J, Paolucci R, Sánchez-Sesma F J. Effect of underground cavities on surface earthquake ground motion under SH-wave propagation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009, 38(12): 1441–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu D K, Lin H. Scattering of SH-waves by an interacting interface linear crack and a circular cavity near bimaterial interface. Chinese Journal of Theoritical and Applied Mechanics, 2004, 20(3): 317–326

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tsaur D H, Chang K H. Multiple scattering of SH-waves by an embedded truncated circular cavity. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2012, 20(1): 73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. He C, Zhou S, Guo P, Di H, Zhang X. Analytical model for vibration prediction of two parallel tunnels in a full-space. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018, 423: 306–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee K M, Rowe R K. An analysis of three-dimensional ground movements: The Thunder Bay tunnel. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1991, 28(1): 25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Molinero J, Samper J, Juanes R. Numerical modeling of the transient hydrogeological response produced by tunnel construction in fractured bedrocks. Engineering Geology, 2002, 64(4): 369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karakus M, Ozsan A, Başarır H. Finite element analysis for the twin metro tunnel constructed in Ankara Clay, Turkey. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2007, 66(1): 71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamamoto K, Lyamin A V, Wilson D W, Sloan S W, Abbo A J. Stability of dual circular tunnels in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 50: 41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Z X, Liu C, Huang X, Kwok C Y, Teng L. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis on ground responses during twin-tunnel construction using the URUP method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 58: 133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Das R, Singh P K, Kainthola A, Panthee S, Singh T N. Numerical analysis of surface subsidence in asymmetric parallel highway tunnels. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 9(1): 170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsinidis G. Response of urban single and twin circular tunnels subjected to transversal ground seismic shaking. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 76: 177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yiouta-Mitra P, Kouretzis G, Bouckovalas G, Sofianos A. Effect of underground structures in earthquake resistant design of surface structures. Dynamic Response and Soil Properties, 2007, 1–10

  34. Chakeri H, Hasanpour R, Hindistan M A, Unver B. Analysis of interaction between tunnels in soft ground by 3-D numerical modeling. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2011, 70(3): 439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Besharat V, Davoodi M, Jafari M K. Effect of underground structures on free-field ground motion during earthquakes. In: The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon: SPES, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  36. Do N A, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of a mechanized twin tunnels in soft ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 42: 40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jamshasb F, Shahrbabaki M K. The impact of approach in shallow twin tunnels on the convergence. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2015, 15: 325–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Narayan J P, Kumar D, Sahar D. Effects of complex interaction of Rayleigh-waves with tunnel on the free surface ground motion and the strain across the tunnel-lining. Natural Hazards, 2015, 79(1): 479–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ziaei A, Ahangari K. The effect of topography on stability of shallow tunnels case study: The diversion and conveyance tunnels of Safa Dam. Transportation Geotechnics, 2018, 14: 126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Beskos D E. Boundary element methods in dynamic analysis. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 1987, 40(1): 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Luco J E, de Barros F C P. Dynamic displacements and stresses in the vicinity of a cylindrical cavity embedded in a half-space. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1994, 23(3): 321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu M C, Dravinski M. Scattering of a plane harmonic SH-wave by a completely embedded corrugated scatterer. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2009, 78(2): 196–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Parvanova S L, Dineva P S, Manolis G D, Wuttke F. Seismic response of lined tunnels in the half-plane with surface topography. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 12(2): 981–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu Z, Liu L. An IBEM solution to the scattering of plane SH-waves by a lined tunnel in elastic wedge space. Earth Science, 2015, 28(1): 71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Benites R, Aki K, Yomogida K. Multiple scattering of SH-waves in 2-D media with many cavities. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1992, 138(3): 353–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Panji M, Asgari Marnani J, Tavousi Tafreshi S. Evaluation of effective parameters on the underground tunnel stability using BEM. Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnic, 2011, 1(2): 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  47. Panji M, Koohsari H, Adampira M, Alielahi H, Asgari Marnani J. Stability analysis of shallow tunnels subjected to eccentric loads by a boundary element method. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 8(4): 480–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Panji M, Ansari B. Modeling pressure pipe embedded in two-layer soil by a half-plane BEM. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 81(C): 360–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Takemiya H, Fujiwara A. SH-wave scattering and propagation analyses at irregular sites by time domain BEM. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1994, 84(5): 1443–1455

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kamalian M, Jafari M K, Ghayamghamian M R, Shafiee A, Hamzehloo H, Haghshenas E, Sohrabi-Bidar A. Site effect microzonation of Qom, Iran. Engineering Geology, 2008, 97(1–2): 63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rice J M, Sadd M H. A note on computing elastodynamic full field displacements arising from subsurface singular sources. Mechanics Research Communications, 1984, 11(6): 385–390

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Belytschko T, Chang H S. Simplified direct time integration boundary element method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1988, 114(1): 117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hirai H. Analysis of transient response of SH-wave scattering in a half space by the boundary element method. Engineering Analysis, 1988, 5(4): 189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Panji M, Kamalian M, Asgari-Marnani J, Jafari M K. Transient analysis of wave propagation problems by half-plane BEM. Geophysical Journal International, 2013, 194(3): 1849–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Panji M, Kamalian M, Marnani J A, Jafari M K. Anti-plane seismic response from semi-sine shaped valley above embedded truncated circular cavity: A time-domain half-plane BEM. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 12(2): 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  56. Panji M, Kamalian M, Marnani J A, Jafari M K. Analyzing seismic convex topographies by a half-plane time-domain BEM. Geophysical Journal International, 2014, 197(1): 591–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Panji M, Ansari B. Transient SH-wave scattering by the lined tunnels embedded in an elastic half-plane. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2017, 84: 220–230

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Panji M, Mojtabazadeh-Hasanlouei S. Time-history responses on the surface by regularly distributed enormous embedded cavities: Incident SH-waves. Earth Science, 2018, 31: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Panji M, Mojtabazadeh-Hasanlouei S. Seismic amplification pattern of the ground surface in presence of twin unlined circular tunnels subjected to SH-waves. Journal of Transportation Infrastructure Engineering, 2019, 5(3): 111–134 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huang L, Liu Z, Wu C, Liang J. The scattering of plane P, SV-waves by twin lining tunnels with imperfect interfaces embedded in an elastic half-space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 85: 319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Panji M, Mojtabazadeh-Hasanlouei S, Yasemi F. A half-plane timedomain BEM for SH-wave scattering by a subsurface inclusion. Computers & Geosciences, 2020, 134: 104342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mojtabazadeh-Hasanlouei S, Panji M, Kamalian M. On subsurface multiple inclusions model under transient SH-wave propagation. Waves in Random and Complex Media, 2020

  63. Panji M, Mojtabazadeh-Hasanlouei S. Transient response of irregular surface by periodically distributed semi-sine shaped valleys: Incident SH-waves. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2020, 14(1): 2050005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen L, Liu C, Zhao W, Liu L. An isogeometric approach of two-dimensional acoustic design sensitivity analysis and topology optimization analysis for absorbing material distribution. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 336: 507–532

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen L, Lu C, Lian H, Liu Z, Zhao W, Li S, Chen H, Bordas S P A. Acoustic topology optimization of sound absorbing materials directly from subdivision surfaces with isogeometric boundary element methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112806

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Shaaban A M, Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Rabczuk T. Shape optimization by conventional and extended isogeometric boundary element method with PSO for two-dimensional Helmholtz acoustic problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2020, 113: 156–169

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Shaaban A M, Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Rabczuk T. Isogeo-metric boundary element analysis and shape optimization by PSO for 3D axi-symmetric high frequency Helmholtz acoustic problems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 486: 115598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kolymbas D. Tunneling and Tunnel Mechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  69. Morse P M, Feshbach H. Methods of Theoretical Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1953

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Eringen A C, Suhubi E S. Elastodynamics. New York: Academic Press, 1975

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Brebbia C A, Dominguez J. Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course. Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1989

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Dominguez J. Boundary Elements in Dynamics. Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1993

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Panji M, Ansari B. Anti-plane seismic ground motion above twin horseshoe-shaped lined tunnels. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2020, 5(1): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ji D, Lei W, Li H. Corner treatment by assigning dual tractions to every node for elastodynamics in TD-BEM. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2016, 284: 125–135

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Mathworks. MATLAB, The Language of Technical Computing V.9.9. Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  76. Trifunac M D. Scattering of plane SH-waves by a semi-cylindrical canyon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1972, 1(3): 267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Borcherdt R D. Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthquake Spectra, 1994, 10(4): 617–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Panji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panji, M., Mojtabazadeh-Hasanlouei, S. On subsurface box-shaped lined tunnel under incident SH-wave propagation. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 948–960 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0740-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0740-x

Keywords

Navigation