Skip to main content
Log in

Self-centring segmental retaining walls—A new construction system for retaining walls

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on an experimental study on a new self-centring retaining wall system. Four post-tensioned segmental retaining walls (PSRWs) were experimentally tested. Each of the walls was constructed using seven T-shaped concrete segments with a dry stack. The walls were tested under incrementally increasing cyclic lateral load. The effect of the wall height, levels of post-tensioning (PT) force, and bonded versus unbonded condition of PT reinforcement on the structural behavior of the PSRWs was investigated. The results showed that such PSRWs are structurally adequate for water retaining structures. According to the results, increasing the wall height decreases initial strength but increases the deformation capacity of the wall. The larger deformation capacity and ductility of PSRW make it a suitable structural system for fluctuating loads or deformation, e.g., seawall. It was also found that increasing the PT force increases the wall’s stiffness; however, reduces its ductility. The residual drift and the extent of damage of the unbonded PSRWs were significantly smaller than those of the bonded ones. Results suggest that this newly developed self-centring retaining wall can be a suitable structural system to retain lateral loads. Due to its unique deformation capacity and self-centring behavior, it can potentially be used for seawall application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang X, Wang L, Zhang T. Geometry-based assessment of levee stability and overtopping using airborne lidar altimetry: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta, Southern China. Water (Basel), 2020, 12(2): 403–423

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferdous W, Bai Y, Almutairi A D, Satasivam S, Jeske J. Modular assembly of water-retaining walls using GFRP hollow profiles: Components and connection performance. Composite Structures, 2018, 194: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Meer R. Glass Flood Defences: A theoretical and practical assessment of the impact resistance of Glass Flood Defences to floating debris. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas R, Hall B. Seawall Design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcinkowski A, Gralewski J. The comparison of the environmental impact of steel and vinyl sheet piling: Life cycle assessment study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 17(9): 4019–4030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson D P, Trewern C J. Design challenges associated with the use of non-metallic materials in marine sheet pile walls. In: Annual Conference of the Australasian Corrosion Association 2015: Corrosion and Prevention 2015. Adelaide: Australasian Corrosion Association (ACA), 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith P. Marine Concrete Structures: Design, Durability and Performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016, 17–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sills G L, Vroman N D, Wahl R E, Schwanz N T. Overview of New Orleans levee failures: Lessons learned and their impact on national levee design and assessment. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 556–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen L, Korswagen P A, Bricker J D, Pasterkamp S, de Bruijn K M, Jonkman S N. Experimental determination of pressure coefficients for flood loading of walls of Dutch terraced houses. Engineering Structures, 2020, 216: 110647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sajedi S, Sheykhloo P A, Lopez A. Design optimization of flood walls using evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of Geo-Congress 2019: Earth Retaining Structures and Geosynthetics. Philadelphia: ASCE, 2019, 247–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Choudhury D, Rajesh B. Geotechnics for Natural Disaster Mitigation and Management. Singapore: Springer, 2020, 109–118

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Naus D. The management of aging in nuclear power plant concrete structures. JOM, 2009, 61(7): 35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schupack M, Suarez M G. Some recent corrosion embrittlement failures of prestressing systems in the United States. PCI Journal, 1982(March–April): 38–55

  14. Warner R F. Prestressed Concrete. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karayannis C G, Chalioris C E. Design of partially prestressed concrete beams based on the cracking control provisions. Engineering Structures, 2013, 48: 402–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Twigden K M, Sritharan S, Henry R S. Cyclic testing of unbonded post-tensioned concrete wall systems with and without supplemental damping. Engineering Structures, 2017, 140: 406–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moroder D, Smith T, Dunbar A, Pampanin S, Buchanan A. Seismic testing of post-tensioned Pres-Lam core walls using cross laminated timber. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 639–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Javadi M, Hassanli R, Rahman M, Karim R. Experimental study on cyclic behavior of post-tensioned segmental retaining walls (PSRWs). Engineering Structures, 2021, 229: 111619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sika Australia Pty Ltd. SikaGrout®-300 PT AU. Product Data Sheets. 2020

  22. AS 1478.2. Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, Mortar and Grout—Part 2: Methods of Sampling and Testing Admixtures for Concrete, Mortar and Grout. Sydney: Standards Australia, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  23. AS 3972. General Purpose and Blended Cements. Sydney: Standards Australia, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  24. AS 1012.9. Methods of Testing Concrete Compressive Strength Tests—Concrete, Mortar and Grout Specimens. Sydney: Standards Australia, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  25. ACI 374.1–05. Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dawood H, Elgawady M, Hewes J. Factors affecting the seismic behavior of segmental precast bridge columns. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(4): 388–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. FEMA 356. Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hines E M, Restrepo J I, Seible F. Force-displacement characterization of well-confined bridge piers. ACI Structural Journal, 2004, 101(4): 537–548

    Google Scholar 

  29. Watson S, Park R. Simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(6): 1825–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hewes J. Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. California: University of California, San Diego, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mortezaei A, Ronagh H R. Plastic hinge length of FRP strengthened reinforced concrete columns subjected to both far-fault and near-fault ground motions. Scientia Iranica, 2012, 19(6): 1365–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hassanli R, ElGawady M, Mills J E. Plastic hinge length of unbonded post-tensioned masonry walls. In: The 12th North American Masonry. Denvor: The Masonry Society, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hassanli R, ElGawady M, Mills J E. Force-displacement behavior of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls. Engineering Structures, 2016, 106: 495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Camfield F E. Wave forces on wall. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 1991, 117(1): 76–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. AS 4678–2002. Earth Retaining Structures. Sydney: Standards Australia, 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this experimental work by the University of South Australia. Special thanks to T. Golding, R. Muscher, M. Plew, C. Sweetman and H. Senko and the technical support staff from the Concrete Laboratory at the University of South Australia, for their dedication and assistance before and during the tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Hassanli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javadi, M., Hassanli, R., Rahman, M.M. et al. Self-centring segmental retaining walls—A new construction system for retaining walls. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 980–1000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0737-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0737-5

Keywords

Navigation